—> ICE / Immigration Catch-All

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 109K
  • Politics 
Didn’t know about the TRO. That was actually from 2021 and does shed some light on the situation. Typically you don’t apply for a TRO is if it is a one time situation.

Good catch. I was wrong about the date.

I wouldn't agree with you about the TRO application, though. They're designed to have a very low threshold, and there's not really much rhyme or reason to when a survivor of domestic violence takes them out.

Of course, it has nothing to do with the facts and history of his extraordinary rendition. And lest our paid Russian agitator want to make anything of it, Trump's second wife alleged domestic violence far more serious than this.
 
Anyone find it ironic that this administration is arguing that we could send US citizens to El Salvador but simultaneously arguing that once they are in El Salvador we have no ability to retrieve them if needed.

Seems to be they destroyed their ability to make a future argument about sending US citizens there, especially for anyone who isn't serving a life sentence.
 
From the end: "We yet cling to the hope that it is not naïve to believe our good brethren in the Executive Branch perceive the rule of law as vital to the American ethos. This case presents their unique chance to vindicate that value and to summon the best that is within us while there is still time."

Oh, Judge Wilkinson, how are you so credulous after all this time on Earth?

Seriously, I know he has to write that because the WH responds poorly to criticism, but come on. It's not necessarily that they think the rule of law is not important. It's that they have an intentionally blinkered view of it that makes their "rule of law" look different from everyone else's.
 
That reads almost like the Gettysburg Address -- much more poetic and symbolic than a typical court opinion.
Trump doesn't give a damn about the rule of law. That's easy to see. Great opinion and makes complete sense.
 
Reuters: APPEALS COURT DENIES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT'S REQUEST TO HALT JUDGE'S ORDER REQUIRING IT TO 'FACILITATE' RETURN OF WRONGLY DEPORTED MAN
 
 
Reuters: APPEALS COURT DENIES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT'S REQUEST TO HALT JUDGE'S ORDER REQUIRING IT TO 'FACILITATE' RETURN OF WRONGLY DEPORTED MAN
In case you want to read it, Copy of decision is on prior page of this thread.
 
Back
Top