—> ICE / Immigration Catch-All

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 109K
  • Politics 

That's not only increasingly the Trump Administration's final defense of any of their actions - "Americans voted for this" or "we're just doing what the voters elected us to do" - but it's also the go-to defense of his supporters on this board and elsewhere. And the truth is in many ways they're right - this is what the great majority of his nearly 78 million voters thought they wanted - causing chaos, shaking things up, burning down the system, hurting people they don't like, etc. However, it has certainly been interesting reading the growing number of stories from Trumpers who have lost their jobs or their businesses are suffering thanks to Dear Leader's actions claiming that "this isn't what I voted for!" As to the legality and ethics and morals of what they're doing, that's obviously a very different matter.
 
This was a topic on Fox and Friends this morning. Not that this picture was obviously photoshopped and poorly, but that they were having margaritas together.

Couldn’t hear since it was at the gym but seeing all of the headlines they ran through, I can see where some of our loonier pubs/MAGA get their talking points. Thought their source would one of the farther right media outlets. Nope, Fox is all in on the crazy talk.
 
I wonder if HintonJamesHeel will think it's unwise for Democrats to push back next week when the Insurrection Act is invoked...

Imagine the ads! I bet an upside down bible will be featured...
 
I didnt take from that at all that Judge Wilkinson is giving the administration the benefit of the doubt and crediting what they say. Thats the closest I’ve ever seen a federal appellate judge come to saying that the sitting executive is a lawless tyrant. As you essentially acknowledge, actually saying Trump is a lawless tyrant would just be counterproductive in this context. If people perceive the courts as biased and/or overreaching it will make it easier for Trump to further degrade and disregard them.
I mean, that closing is kind of ridiculous, right? But as I said, I know why he wrote it. It's not a criticism of Wilkinson that what would otherwise be a perfectly anodyne statement is actually patent unrealism. It's a criticism of the WH adminstration.
 
My rhetorical question to anyone opposed to bringing Abrego Garcia back is this: If you can achieve the same result (deportation to El Salvador) or substantially the same result (deportation to some other country) while following the law, why would you not want to do that? Is the law-flouting the point?
Give it up, he's not coming back, rightfully so!
 
I'm going to say something that will likely not be popular here, and I say it fully recognizing I'm lowering the bar. I'm more deeply moved by an unimpeachable renunciation of Trumpism by an arch-conservative like Wilkinson than I am by a liberal. If that opinion had been written by someone like Michelle Childs, I would still have loved it, but it wouldn't have impacted me the same way. So I guess that's a challenge to the callatoroys and HeelYeahs who have conveniently disappeared recently. This board doesn't really matter, but it would still be nice to know you see what's happening and you're willing to fight it, and that the entirety of Republicanism hasn't been coopted by Russian trolls like Silence Dogood.
calla has been active on IC lately, lol.
 
Back
Top