Callatoroy
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 2,906
Wonder who that congressional official is?
I would have thought it would be more than that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You mean the same ship that would have been firing on oil tankers when it got back to iran? Was that ship their symbol of peace?If that is true...I'm at a loss. That is a level of approved cruelty that I needed to believe our country was above.
You're probably right (that it is a higher figure). Youssef is a reporter for The Atlantic, so the official - likely on background for now, given how the administration feels about unofficial releases of information - probably offered what (s)he felt was a legitimate figure at the current time.Wonder who that congressional official is?
I would have thought it would be more than that.
bullshit. you didn't try. God told me.I tried. Not even God can help you overcome your handicaps.
The flacid congress makes that impossible.Trump must be ousted. He is out of control.
On second thought maybe its not. Depending on how the figure is calculated. Did they include fixed cost? headcount, food, pay (excluding combat pay), some fuel, etc. would have been incurred regardless of attacking. I'm assuming its bombs, extra fuel, equipment losses, parts, etc. So all variable costs.You're probably right (that it is a higher figure). Youssef is a reporter for The Atlantic, so the official - likely on background for now, given how the administration feels about unofficial releases of information - probably offered what (s)he felt was a legitimate figure at the current time.
what excuses will the left come up with if it takes the house and senate? Vance has been complicit with everything trump has done so why not get rid of him as well? That would give you 17 more options so not sure where you guys stop. Maybe Rubio?The flacid congress makes that impossible.
It's slander when any person equates critique of the government of a country with religious discrimination. When people criticize the government of Iran, I do not for one second presume that their issue is with Islam unless they specifically say so. Even then, it isn't racism because religious intolerance is not racism.Slander? Only when it goes from right to left correct? When it goes from left to right it’s racism.
Were they engaged in any hostility whatsoever? If not, they are not combatants.You mean the same ship that would have been firing on oil tankers when it got back to iran? Was that ship their symbol of peace?
I think the ship had been disarmed for the exercises in India.Were they engaged in any hostility whatsoever? If not, they are not combatants.
While technically true, jews as a race has been accepted since the nazis tried to exterminate them.It's slander when any person equates critique of the government of a country with religious discrimination. When people criticize the government of Iran, I do not for one second presume that their issue is with Islam unless they specifically say so. Even then, it isn't racism because religious intolerance is not racism.
and common sense says they would have rearmed and been shooting at oil tankers. Giving the country that is indiscriminately attacking civilians and its neighbors who haven't attacked them the benefit of the doubt is lunacy and born out of trump hatred. I mean this is a leftist board so you won't get questioned. Admit it. You are pulling for iran aren't you?Were they engaged in any hostility whatsoever? If not, they are not combatants.
Such amoral thinking usually invites unexpected retaliation. And I'm not sure what ignoring survivors accomplishes, but then again it kept them from getting back to Iran and returning to the fray. But what about Iranians already in America, what about teenage Iranian boys? What about child producing women in a Iran who could raise future soldiers who could man boats that hurt our country? Your logic allows and invites annihilation. A number of historical figures, however, nod their heads in agreement with you.You mean the same ship that would have been firing on oil tankers when it got back to iran? Was that ship their symbol of peace?
Such amoral thinking usually invites unexpected retaliation. And I'm not sure what ignoring survivors accomplishes, but then again it kept them from getting back to Iran and returning to the fray. But what about Iranians already in America, what about teenage Iranian boys? What about child producing women in a Iran who could raise future soldiers who could man boats that hurt our country? Your logic allows and invites annihilation. A number of historical figures, however, nod their heads in agreement with you.
It is far more than that.Wonder who that congressional official is?
I would have thought it would be more than that.