Iran Catch-All | IRAN WAR

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 5K
  • Views: 157K
  • Politics 
Would some of you fucks go read about the My Lai massacre and find out what Americans are willing to do to people who don't look like us. Then take the next step and stfu about the ""99.99% or whatever" chance that we wouldn't do such a thing intentionally.
My Lai was not intentional on the part of the army. It was a unit reacting under stress and doing the exact wrong thing. It was horrible; it was an expected result of the war we were waging; and it's one reason we try not to wage war like that any more. But it wasn't something that the military aimed to do, and it's not good evidence of what the military would do today.
 
Come on, Zen. This is so stupid. In that absurd hypothetical, both sides would be no holds barred. The death count on each side would be much higher than 75k. Nobody would hesitate to kill civilians. Israel would probably kill more people because they have far more experience with military tactics and operations than the Palestinians, but the hypothetical is dumb on its face. It has nothing to do with the current situation, in which Israel and the US have the virtually unfettered ability to drop as many bombs as they want in Iran.
Come on, Zen. This is so stupid. In that absurd hypothetical, both sides would be no holds barred. The death count on each side would be much higher than 75k. Nobody would hesitate to kill civilians. Israel would probably kill more people because they have far more experience with military tactics and operations than the Palestinians, but the hypothetical is dumb on its face. It has nothing to do with the current situation, in which Israel and the US have the virtually unfettered ability to drop as many bombs as they want in Iran.
If it wasn't no holds barred, how do you think it would play out if Hamas had the same weapons, the war lasted for 2.5 years and Israel maintained the same approach they've had for the last two and a half years?
 
Come on, Zen. This is so stupid. In that absurd hypothetical, both sides would be no holds barred. The death count on each side would be much higher than 75k. Nobody would hesitate to kill civilians. Israel would probably kill more people because they have far more experience with military tactics and operations than the Palestinians, but the hypothetical is dumb on its face. It has nothing to do with the current situation, in which Israel and the US have the virtually unfettered ability to drop as many bombs as they want in Iran.
If the two sides were military equals, there wouldn't have been a war. MAD has never operated in that region because the US has always supplied Israel, but if the sides were equal, then it would likely be exactly that and any war would likely wrap up immediately. You know, like some of the actual wars.
 
My Lai was not intentional on the part of the army. It was a unit reacting under stress and doing the exact wrong thing. It was horrible; it was an expected result of the war we were waging; and it's one reason we try not to wage war like that any more. But it wasn't something that the military aimed to do, and it's not good evidence of what the military would do today.
It's excellent evidence that we will do it and that being American won't stop us. You're assuming our current military is competent.
 
My Lai was not intentional on the part of the army. It was a unit reacting under stress and doing the exact wrong thing. It was horrible; it was an expected result of the war we were waging; and it's one reason we try not to wage war like that any more. But it wasn't something that the military aimed to do, and it's not good evidence of what the military would do today.
The unit would get Silver Stars for the massacre if they were under Hegseth.
 
It's excellent evidence that we will do it and that being American won't stop us. You're assuming our current military is competent.
I'm not assuming anything. I just don't think that My Lai tells us anything we don't know by other means. Listening to Pete Hegseth is evidence enough. I suppose I never gave any consideration to the idea that being American prevents us from doing terrible things. If that is a serious claim, then yes I agree with you.
 
Ok. How exactly does that matter to the discussion of whether it is more likely that Israel, Iran, or the US would have intentionally bombed the school, with the understanding that the most likely explanation is that it was hit accidentally?
Because the claim by cford is that the school bombing makes us the "evil" oned, which is not accurate.

Those who use civilians as human shields, use billions in foreign aid to build tunnels for terrorists and not for civilians, use women and children as explosives and weapons, hijack aid and medical supplies and hide them in the tunnels, intentionally target infants, children, women and the elderly, etc are the evil ones.
 
Because the claim by cford is that the school bombing makes us the "evil" oned, which is not accurate.

Those who use civilians as human shields, use billions in foreign aid to build tunnels for terrorists and not for civilians, use women and children as explosives and weapons, hijack aid and medical supplies and hide them in the tunnels, intentionally target infants, children, women and the elderly, etc are the evil ones.
I think the mistake is labeling one side as good and the other as bad, in this case. There is a hell of a lot of evil to go around, and the US definitely is not acting like the good guys at the moment. But, yes, I agree that anyone operating under the rules of Sharia law is also pretty fucking bad.
 
Because the claim by cford is that the school bombing makes us the "evil" oned, which is not accurate.

Those who use civilians as human shields, use billions in foreign aid to build tunnels for terrorists and not for civilians, use women and children as explosives and weapons, hijack aid and medical supplies and hide them in the tunnels, intentionally target infants, children, women and the elderly, etc are the evil ones.
Ahem —

Iran Catch-All | IRAN WAR​

 
Because the claim by cford is that the school bombing makes us the "evil" oned, which is not accurate.

Those who use civilians as human shields, use billions in foreign aid to build tunnels for terrorists and not for civilians, use women and children as explosives and weapons, hijack aid and medical supplies and hide them in the tunnels, intentionally target infants, children, women and the elderly, etc are the evil ones.
Yes, inadvertently bombing a school and killing dozens upon dozens of innocent children absolutely makes us evil **when we refuse to hold the responsible folks accountable**. That’s, like, not even remotely up for debate. The bombing itself was almost certainly accidental. The cover-up and the refusal to hold the responsible parties accountable, is not accidental, and therefore it is evil. This is pretty basic stuff, man. I knew we had a pretty big divide between our politics, I did not know we had a pretty big divide between our humanity and inhumanity. I’m disappointed in you.
 
Because the claim by cford is that the school bombing makes us the "evil" oned, which is not accurate.

Those who use civilians as human shields, use billions in foreign aid to build tunnels for terrorists and not for civilians, use women and children as explosives and weapons, hijack aid and medical supplies and hide them in the tunnels, intentionally target infants, children, women and the elderly, etc are the evil ones.
We have established that Hamas is evil. I am fairly confident, though, that Hamas did not bomb the Iranian school. Perhaps we should keep the focus on what actually happened in that incident, and who is responsible, rather than trying to change the subject?

“Hamas is really evil” is not really a reasonable response to the question of “did Israel/US do an evil thing.” It’s just a deflection.
 
Back
Top