Iran Catch-All | US Build-up in region

  • Thread starter Thread starter theel4life
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 99K
  • Politics 
King Hippo said:
MAGA don't care about facts. Facts don't make America great again!
Click to expand...
here is a fact for you dumb ass

"

The JCPOA does not require Iran to submit to “anytime, anywhere” IAEA inspections of facilities and military sites where nuclear activities are suspected to have occurred. Instead, Iran can delay inspections for 24 days. Of course to idiots like you, iran would never cheat on their promises. That fact, plus the sunsetting clauses included makes the entire deal worthless. But pussyfist, I mean pacifist John Kerry, thought giving iran billions and lifting sanctions for them to agree to inspections, delayed by 24 days was a great deal. anyone supporting that deal is an idiot. Not surprising at all where it came from.​

 
HintonJamesHeel said:
No foreign country is going to attack the US mainland especially not Iran. They sat there and took it from Israel but they are going to come get NC? Yeah whatever.
Click to expand...
What will happen to our 4th and 5th Amendment rights if an Iranian terrorist truck bomb blows up an elementary school in Columbus Ohio?
 
lawtig02 said:
Only difference is I used to defend you when people here called you a dumbass. I learned the hard way they were right.
Click to expand...
You taught me something as well. That TDS can lead a supposedly logical person to abandon his logic and principles.
 
Callatoroy said:
here is a fact for you dumb ass

"

The JCPOA does not require Iran to submit to “anytime, anywhere” IAEA inspections of facilities and military sites where nuclear activities are suspected to have occurred. Instead, Iran can delay inspections for 24 days. Of course to idiots like you, iran would never cheat on their promises. That fact, plus the sunsetting clauses included makes the entire deal worthless. But pussyfist, I mean pacifist John Kerry, thought giving iran billions and lifting sanctions for them to agree to inspections, delayed by 24 days was a great deal. anyone supporting that deal is an idiot. Not surprising at all where it came from.​

Click to expand...
Dumbass is one word, dumbass.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
I think reductions, not eliminations, in a number of programs were probably warranted such as USAid, head start, even NIH among others.

If they are wrong, add some of them back in. But logically, the best programs, the best science, gets funded first. And then the second best program all the way down the list until the budget runs out. The hope is that by cutting the budget, the remaining money goes to the best programs, and the least effective programs die. I thought we even had a shot at making the biggest cut, defense, but looks like that isn't going to happen.
Click to expand...
Funding is for Congress. Efficient execution is for the President. If you think congressionally approved funds are not needed, then go to Congress and ask for a different budget. It is not the president’s job to unilaterally misappropriate funds passed by Congress.
 
nycfan said:

U.S. Officials Concede They Don’t Know Whereabouts of Iran’s Uranium Stockpile​


“… But there was also evidence, according to two Israeli officials with knowledge of the intelligence, that Iran had moved equipment and uranium from the site in recent days."
Click to expand...

With our satellite technology, how in the hell did nobody notice truck convoys leaving the site loaded with nuclear reactor equipment and radioactive material? Was everybody on a lunch break or something?

That sounds like a load of BS to me.
 
King Hippo said:
Logic and principles when it comes to still supporting Trump is an oxymoron.
Click to expand...
Not when your option is kackling kamala. I mean you actually voted for this:



Think how fucked up someone has to be to vote for that for potus. Absolutely incomprehensible. You had many, many other bad choices, but far better than this and this is what you threw democracy out the window for and actually hand picked it. You people should forfeit your right to vote for 2 elections.
 
Callatoroy said:
Not when your option is kackling kamala. I mean you actually voted for this:



Think how fucked up someone has to be to vote for that for potus. Absolutely incomprehensible. You had many, many other bad choices, but far better than this and this is what you threw democracy out the window for and actually hand picked it. You people should forfeit your right to vote for 2 elections.
Click to expand...

Lol. And you think I’m the one who changed?
 
Calheel said:
Funding is for Congress. Efficient execution is for the President. If you think congressionally approved funds are not needed, then go to Congress and ask for a different budget. It is not the president’s job to unilaterally misappropriate funds passed by Congress.
Click to expand...
You might be right. Clinton tried it with the line item veto and got slapped down pretty hard by the courts. I assume Trump will too at some point.

But as the executive, it is much easier not to spend money on things that Congress wants you to spend than it is to spend money on things that Congress doesn't want you to spend.
 


Trump smarting from people (NYT) starting to heat ion his obliteration claim …

splat rugrats GIF
 
Callatoroy said:
www.usatoday.com

AOC howls about impeaching Trump. But president had the authority to bomb Iran. | Opinion

The U.S. bombing three nuclear facilities was strategically the right move and a just action. Iran could not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon.
www.usatoday.com www.usatoday.com

This is why your party is in the pits. She is the face of the dem party and she should be silenced and sidelined if you want to be more than a laughing stock.
Click to expand...
You have a lot of nerve talking about laughing stocks.
 

“… "At the end of the day there are some really important things that haven't been hit," says Jeffrey Lewis, a professor at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, who tracks Iran's nuclear facilities. "If this ends here, it's a really incomplete strike."

… Lewis says the strike doesn't seem to have touched Iran's stocks of highly enriched uranium.

"Today, it still has that material and we still don't know where it is," he says.

"I think you have to assume that significant amounts of this enriched uranium still exist, so this is not over by any means," agrees David Albright, the president of the Institute for Science and International Security, which has closely tracked Iran's nuclear program for years.

The independent assessments stand in stark contrast to congratulatory statements from the Trump Administration in the wake of the strikes.…”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top