Iran War | Politics & Domestic Impacts

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 44
  • Views: 453
  • Politics 
IMG_5438.jpeg



Not quite the same thing but I had not seen this yet. JFC. How does he possibly have authority to assume this risk on behalf of the United States? And does he have any idea how complicated it is to stand up commercial insurance like this?


the little mermaid jaw drop GIF
No, he has no clue. But his dictatorial compulsions are getting worse by the hour.
 
Man, this is going to get tricky for Democrats. With a strong majority of the electorate already opposed to this illegal war and an overwhelming majority of Dems opposed, staking a position on the war and in particular the proposed War Resolution is going to sniff out those who serve Israeli/Zionist interests in contrapose to their ostensible constituencies.

I can already hear the parsing and prevaricating being rehearsed at DNC HQ. There will be a few principled Republicans (Rand Paul and Thomas Massie at least) who will vote no and otherwise object, but the Dems will have to analyze this and designate the assigned yes votes in the manner they approved last year’s budget resolution.

This strikes me as a moment to redefine the party consistent with traditional liberal values - the rule of law and opposition to aggression among others, which, combined with the embrace of its former working class economics, could lead them out of the dark and toward the superiority of their electoral appeal that marked the post-war period.

I would like to say I’m optimistic about that but I’d be lying. I think the party is dead to me.
 
IMG_5438.jpeg



Not quite the same thing but I had not seen this yet. JFC. How does he possibly have authority to assume this risk on behalf of the United States? And does he have any idea how complicated it is to stand up commercial insurance like this?


200.gif
To be clear, DFC already provides political risk insurance but unless Congress changed the statues:

IMG_5439.jpeg

I dunno. Maybe there is a statutory exception that allows POtUS to unilaterally change this?

But crazy to think that they started this mess and here is another layer of cost/risk they are accepting on behalf of American taxpayers to fund it.
 
Back
Top