superrific
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 3,319
Russia has nukes. That's, I think, the entire distinction. It's not an unreasonable one, I don't think.What is the logical reason to continue to provide military aide to an ally that disregards any restrictions you propose regarding the use of that aide and/or any input on the underlying military campaign?
Of course the most obvious answer is that there is an overriding interest in seeing that ally prevail but I would be interested in viewpoints on this. For example, Ukraine has had to abide by every restriction that has been imposed by the West (including the US) on use of their weapons against Russia.