Joe Biden Was NOT running the country

  • Thread starter Thread starter GuyFree
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 385
  • Views: 7K
  • Politics 
Repeating from my May 2nd post…our “dear leader” is nearing entry into a “graveyard spiral ” to madness. The POTUS can not assemble a group of simple words to form a coherent sentence. The ground is coming up fast and we all are on board!
If the Republicans were truly worried about the president being of sound mind, they would be working to move on from Trump. But this is just ask talk for then since they can point at Biden.

We need some new rules for who can run for president. Age being a concern. Also no one with a felony conviction or 34, should be able to run.
 
The “revelations” over the last few days about Biden not being up to it is a nothing burger to anyone with sense. It was clear to anyone with eyes that Biden had cognitive decline early into his term. It is a fair question to ask who was running the country but since we have had Trump-Biden-Trump, it’s pretty clear that the government runs itself.
Well it was until Trump decided to bring in the chain saw. Amazingly even with his best efforts, it hasn't collapsed.
 
Maybe. Couldn't have done worse than Kamala.

I actually think that wouldn't have been a horrible idea. Someone could have come to her and say Joe is not going to make it through another campaign. Let's put you in a primary where you are basically the incumbent, and go for it. That preserves Joe's legacy and we have a primary process to see if she (and Kamala) can stand up to Trump.

She's not a politician but she has been a politician's wife for decades. It might have worked.

And you think that would have been better than someone who was an district attorney, attorney general, state senator, and vice president?
 
Your age catches up to you sooner or later. It didn't with Nancy Pelosi. Biden was still pretty sharp early last year for the State of the Union. He handed it to the Republicans.

The way things work, hamstrings a First Term President. He has to run or his first term comes to an end the minute its announced and then nothing else gets done. Not fair to his supporters if that causes his one and only term to fall short of accomplishments. It's not guaranteed that his Party will win the next election. It sucks.

You know, when Republicans come out with this complaint, I have to think the same thing could have been said about Trump back in 2020. He looked and acted like road kill back then. Not to mention his chaos back then and now makes you wonder if he can really drive the office.
 
I suspect he is just based on his age. I also think the clips are taken out of context. He doesn't do a lot of interviews but if you look at his interview on Joe Rogan he sounds pretty with it and that was only a few months ago.

Now pretty with it and a competent and effective president who is making the right decisions are two different things. In other words, I think he's probably slower but okay cognitively but I wouldn't want him as president as a 50-year-old.
lmao, go watch clips from his media availability today in qatar and talk to me about things being taken out of context. gtfoh.

i know HS kids who can speak with more sense and authority on many of those topics.

he's an addlepated dipshit.
 
And you think that would have been better than someone who was an district attorney, attorney general, state senator, and vice president?
Maybe. Hillary Clinton probably had a better resume than Kamala and got beat. Al Gore had a decent resume that was probably better than Harris and got beat. George HW Bush probably had the best resume of all and got beat. I don't think any of them were very good politicians.

Kerry had a very good resume and was a pretty good politician but got beat. McCain had a lot better resume than some one term senator from Illinois and was a very good politician and got beat decisively. Oftentimes the resume doesn't make that much of a difference and sometimes it's just not your party's year.

Would Jill Biden have been better than Harris? Who knows. But I don't think Harris's resume would have made that much of a difference. A primary might have told us quite a bit.
 
I suspect he is just based on his age. I also think the clips are taken out of context. He doesn't do a lot of interviews but if you look at his interview on Joe Rogan he sounds pretty with it and that was only a few months ago.

Now pretty with it and a competent and effective president who is making the right decisions are two different things. In other words, I think he's probably slower but okay cognitively but I wouldn't want him as president as a 50-year-old.
They are not out of context. Look at the recent interview where he wanted to argue that a clearly photoshopped picture wasn't fake.
 
Jill Biden pales in comparison.
Jill Biden certainly wouldn't have been my first choice but my point is someone could have gone to her when there was still time to run a primary and said Joe isn't fit for a second term and your best bet to stay in power is to run as the incumbent's wife.
 
John Kerry was a junior senator when he won the nomination.

He had negative charisma and was awkward as hell…..he was not a good candidate for POTUS.

Democrats stupidly thought his Vietnam War experience mattered and would elevate him above Dubya.
 
Poor John Kerry. He had 20 years of experience as a Senator and won four elections when he won the nomination for President, but to some people he'll always be the junior senator from Massachusetts.
 
Maybe. Couldn't have done worse than Kamala.

I actually think that wouldn't have been a horrible idea. Someone could have come to her and say Joe is not going to make it through another campaign. Let's put you in a primary where you are basically the incumbent, and go for it. That preserves Joe's legacy and we have a primary process to see if she (and Kamala) can stand up to Trump.

She's not a politician but she has been a politician's wife for decades. It might have worked.
Of course they could have done worse than Harris, they could have ran you and Zen.


😁

Or me, that would have guaranteed a loss.
 
Then why would someone suggest she would have been a better choice?

If she doesn't have a better resume, what's the difference?
My apologies for making jokes that are only funny in my own head. Meant that as a sort of lefthanded reference to the complexion differences. Melanin references are having a rough week.

But oh, I'm just a soul whose intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood
 
My apologies for making jokes that are only funny in my own head. Meant that as a sort of lefthanded reference to the complexion differences. Melanin references are having a rough week.

But oh, I'm just a soul whose intentions are good
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood
Damn man, sorry, see it now. :)

I've always been weak on picking up the sarcasm.
 
John Kerry was a junior senator when he won the nomination.

He had negative charisma and was awkward as hell…..he was not a good candidate for POTUS.

Democrats stupidly thought his Vietnam War experience mattered and would elevate him above Dubya.
The Dems went for Republicans’ bait in that one. When Gore was running for president, before he picked his running mate, many Pubs said they feared Kerry the most as a potential running mate. So Dems bit in the next election and put Kerry up there.

One of Kerry’s problems was that he was incredibly timid and overly cautious. He was frightened to say anything that could be deemed as bold and was scared to come out of his shell.

Also, to this day… or at least as of very recently… Dems have made the error of assuming that a Dem candidate’s military service will matter to voters.
 
Back
Top