Kamala Harris Left Off Absentee Ballot - Montana

  • Thread starter Thread starter dukeman92
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 47
  • Views: 959
  • Politics 
gtyellowjacket said:
No. You cmon. I need to start buying stock in tin foil companies.
Click to expand...
Cmon man
No. You cmon.
Come at me bro!
No. You come at ME bro!

Hahaha middle fucking schooler bro.

You know what, I accused you of equivocating on this, now I’ll simply call B.S. on you.

And just because Zen mode has your back don’t mean squat.

If this happened to trump he and his minions would use this as exhibit A for claiming election fraud… all the way to Jan 6 2025. Whipping up his throng again to use it as a cudgel once more.

You know it. I know it. And the American people know it.

And because some on here smell something fishy about this episode, and are simply calling attention to it, you and zen start JCDing for the beeyotch in Montana. Fuckyuns. Fuckyuns both.
 
ZenMode said:
I tend to agree. There is no chance this error goes undetected and it will only bring huge criticism and unwanted attention.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure the "They wouldn't do that because you'd have to be stupid to do that." defense is as airtight as you think it is.
 
Ddseddse said:
I'm not sure the "They wouldn't do that because you'd have to be stupid to do that." defense is as airtight as you think it is.
Click to expand...
Not only would it be stupid, it would be pointless. Harris has no chance to win Montana.
 
ZenMode said:
Not only would it be stupid, it would be pointless. Harris has no chance to win Montana.
Click to expand...
The pointless part is precisely what makes it stupid. They are one and the same.

This may or may not have been intentional, but regardless, bigger picture, "Trumpists would never do that because it would be stupid" is probably not a hill you want to die on.
 
ZenMode said:
Why is anyone surprised when the government, at any level does things poorly?

This impacted less than 300 ballots. It's just another gob'ment screw up
Click to expand...
No. It can only be some sort of plot just like the Montana thing. There is absolutely no chance that anyone could make a simple mistake like those. These election officials and their shadowy Republican masters were just hoping no one would notice.
 
As a rule, I don’t give Republican election officials the benefit of the doubt. Do we really think they’re above this type of ratfucking?
 
I should stay logged in when I read the board. gt is going to gt though, always. I typically get to a gt post and skip it.

Zen having gt's back in a thread doens't surprise me. I threw zen in the gt pile of useless very early on on this board. I've said it elsewhere but them pointing to "trump said nuh uh" about project 2025 revealed all one needs to know about them.
 
ICFree said:
Zen having gt's back in a thread doens't surprise me. I threw zen in the gt pile of useless very early on on this board. I've said it elsewhere but them pointing to "trump said nuh uh" about project 2025 revealed all one needs to know about them.
Click to expand...
Ain't this the truth!
 
He's Not Here said:
It’s not about her winning Montana or not. If it keeps enough people from filling out a ballot, then it could affect Tester
Click to expand...
How would that work exactly? Someone goes through the trouble of signing up to vote electronically absentee in Montana and was going to vote for Kamala and Tester but the ballot shows up without Kamala. Do they just decide not to vote at all? That seems pretty far-fetched, especially when it's fixed a couple hours later.

If you were going to try to do something like this, it seems like a slightly more realistic way to do it would be to keep Kamala and exclude Tester.

Again, I think it was just a simple mistake.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
How would that work exactly? Someone goes through the trouble of signing up to vote electronically absentee in Montana and was going to vote for Kamala and Tester but the ballot shows up without Kamala. Do they just decide not to vote at all? That seems pretty far-fetched, especially when it's fixed a couple hours later.

If you were going to try to do something like this, it seems like a slightly more realistic way to do it would be to keep Kamala and exclude Tester.

Again, I think it was just a simple mistake.
Click to expand...
It could be as simple as “hey, did you hear - Harris isn’t even on the ballot.”

“well, F it. I’m not voting.”


You would hope that announcements and news would rectify that, but there could be some that don’t get the memo.
And I’m not saying it was intentional. It very well, may have been an accident. But, as others have said, GOP election boards don’t exactly deserve the benefit of the doubt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top