MAGA/MAHA/TPUSA/Far Right coalition starting to splinter?

The idiots forgot the rules of the game. You can dog whistle away as much as you like (i.e. the majority of the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st). But the moment you allow someone who is willing to say the quiet part out loud into your coalition, you've lost. Period.

The simple fact is that THERE IS NO BOTTOM. Listen, your personal opinion might be that the perfect amount of racism is X amount. But it will never hold the line just there. The awful truth is there is ALWAYS someone next in line who's willing to say ""No, 2X is the correct amount" and of course the mouth breathers will jump on that bandwagon. Then there's someone else in line who wants the attention and power, so they say "no, actually it's 4X"... ad infinitum, ad nauseum. You kind of want to assume that there is some base level of human decency that will set a sort of a floor before we get to mass atrocities. History has show zero evidence for that assumption and consistently disproved it at every turn. Once you get the ball rolling, it's a relatively short trip to mass graves.

Always remember...
1762107390684.png

You've been warned.
The idiots are winning.

Trump screamed the quiet parts as loudly as he could from the time he created/boosted birtherism to when he came down the escalator ranting about lunatic immigrants to now…..he won the White House twice and the MAGA bigotry is loose and running rampant.

By all appearances, MAGA will rule the GQP post-Trump.

Who is going to stop MAGA? Josh Hawley? Ted Cruz? Little Marco? Susan Collins? Lisa Murkowski?
 
The idiots are winning.

Trump screamed the quiet parts as loudly as he could from the time he created/boosted birtherism to when he came down the escalator ranting about lunatic immigrants to now…..he won the White House twice and the MAGA bigotry is loose and running rampant.

By all appearances, MAGA will rule the GQP post-Trump.

Who is going to stop MAGA? Josh Hawley? Ted Cruz? Little Marco? Susan Collins? Lisa Murkowski?
Ted Budd will
 

ā€œā€¦ There is still a narrow window to reverse course—but it’s closing fast. If leadership forces genuine consequences—cutting ties, refusing to give platforms to extremists, reasserting pluralist values—there’s a chance to reclaim a version of the party that resists the drift. Not the old GOP, but a less than nazi one.

But the odds are stacked. Too much has already shifted. I hope the forces of decency, inclusion, democratic resilience prevail. I want to see a conservative movement that honors the rule of law again, protects minorities finally, supports dissent, and rejects ethno-religious majoritarianism. Yet I’m not holding my breath. The path ahead leads deeper into illiberal territory than most are ready to acknowledge—and unless something breaks, the consequences will be severe for our democracy.

I’m not naive. I’m not rooting for Republican victories, they’ve lost the right to govern in my eyes. I just hope for the sake of our country, those who support authoritarianism (all of em) at least push back against outright Nazi-ism.ā€
 
Yeah, I’ve noted Cruz, McConnell and Crenshaw in this thread or the October Current Events one. Kenzinger credited McConnell and Cruz for their pushback.

It was actually McConnell’s decision to wade in that convinced me the back-biting that had been bubbling up in the influencer sphere since Kirk’s death really had spread well outside conservative influencer spaces into a broader right wing political fight.

In response to some other comments in the thread, I’m not holding out hope that this will actually do serious damage to the MAGA coalition, but I do think it is informative to watch how this unfolds in terms of the post-Trump direction of the movement.
 
Yeah, I’ve noted Cruz, McConnell and Crenshaw in this thread or the October Current Events one. Kenzinger credited McConnell and Cruz for their pushback.

It was actually McConnell’s decision to wade in that convinced me the back-biting that had been bubbling up in the influencer sphere since Kirk’s death really had spread well outside conservative influencer spaces into a broader right wing political fight.

In response to some other comments in the thread, I’m not holding out hope that this will actually do serious damage to the MAGA coalition, but I do think it is informative to watch how this unfolds in terms of the post-Trump direction of the movement.
I don't think the fight itself will do damage to the MAGA coalition, but as you noted on the other thread, I think this shows how fragile the coalition is when it doesn't have Trump to rally around. Vance probably has the best chance to hold the coalition together, and I think that's what he's trying to do here. But Vance seems to lack Trump's ability to dog whistle loudly without overtly endorsing the most unsavory parts of his coalition. By wading in to defend the Nazi-loving "kids" running the GOP in various states and refusing to denounce Tucker, Vance has cast his lot with the white nationalist wing of the movement. Trump got close with his Charlottesville and "Proud Boys stand by" comments, but I don't think he would do what Vance has done.

If nothing else, potential candidates from other parts of the coalition now have some really damaging clips to use against Vance. And I don't think it's likely Vance or anyone else will be as immune from accountability for his prior statements as Trump has been.
 
"everything is fiiiiiineee, you guys!!!!! only half of the right are nazi's or nazi apologists/platformers!!!!"
 
"everything is fiiiiiineee, you guys!!!!! only half of the right are nazi's or nazi apologists/platformers!!!!"
Despite the implications (assumptions) here, we have no idea who is supporting Fuentes, and what he stands for, vs who is supporting the "right" of Tucker to interview Fuentes. :rolleyes:

Do you think the interview suddenly created all kinds of white nationalists/neo-nazis?

I don't.
 
Back
Top