superrific
Master of the ZZLverse
- Messages
- 12,879
I don't think that's right. If a player makes a shot to put his team up 2 with 2 minutes left, and then neither team scores again, would anyone really call that "the winning shot"? That's just a shot, followed by two minutes of inept offense/great defense.Interesting. Regardless of how the NBA defines “game-winning shot,” I think most people would define it as the last shot taken by the winning team that also gives that team the lead immediately after being down or tied.
When we think of game winning shots, we usually require some proximity to the end of the game. Now maybe you can say that 16 seconds is close enough and that's fine. I probably would have done better to describe in terms of buzzer beaters. That's what the MJ shot lacked. There was still plenty of game action after.