What do you propose?Yes there is. You just don’t want to admit it because you like having guns.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do you propose?Yes there is. You just don’t want to admit it because you like having guns.
Ok, so what do you propose? Would you rather go after 1% of shooting deaths or 70% of shooting deaths? Excluding suicides, of course.You are making a logical fallacy that I often see on both the right and the left. The fact that something won't 100% solve a problem does not mean that it is not worth doing at all. That is a perfectionist fallacy.
The value of gun control does not turn on whether it can prevent 100% of shooting deaths.
Simply pointing out your logical fallacy. It never strengthens an argument to point out that something does not solve 100% of the problems. It is logical fluff.Ok, so what do you propose? Would you rather go after 1% of shooting deaths or 70% of shooting deaths? Excluding suicides, of course.
Sorry to disappoint the folks that make up this board.
Shooter was not a white Christian male Trump supporter.
You useless fucks on this board are worse than any GOP voter that ever existed.
You have showed your true character and it is not surprising .
How many trans school shooters does that make ???
Now pretend this didn’t happen and go back to bashing Trump and talking about how smart you are and how your opinions are the only ones that count.
And uncmls or whatever…. You are a racist piece of shit and you will be judged by that one day.
As far as the rest of you go…. Karma is an undefeated motherfucker.
Rock - you allow your cronies to curse out and insult conservatives on here but ban anyone that does the opposite .
You are a grifting low life and you sir can fuck right off as well.
Enjoy the next few voting cycles…. I know I will.
Good ban.
Why are you asking us? You’re the one who votes for Neo Nazis.Why would a neo Nazi guy spouting "6 million was not enough" attack a while Catholic church with children praying? It makes no sense, except what NYCfan just posted about his mom. May be a personal vendetta against the school.
Agreed. I've never claimed that we should only pursue solutions that solve 100% of the problem, because no such solutions exist. Rather, my argument was that we have to accept the fact that these things will happen because there is no realistic way to stop all of them. That doesn't mean that we should be OK with that, and that doesn't mean to stop trying to address the issue. We just need to be realistic.Simply pointing out your logical fallacy. It never strengthens an argument to point out that something does not solve 100% of the problems. It is logical fluff.
Gun control, like all policy decisions, needs to weigh projected benefits vs. projected burdens. As a society, we are very bad with both of those issues -- we tend to overvalue one side of the equation that favors our political lens and undervalue the other side of the equation that goes against our political lens.
But no matter how the policy decisions are weighed -- one thing we should not do is base our decisions on whether they will 100% solve the problem. That is a terrible way to make policy or argue for anything.
Is this true…
We aren't like the rest of the world. There are more guns than people here, and the 2nd amendment means that the genie is not going back in the bottle. So what's the solution? These things have been happening for years. Unfortunately I believe that given our country's history and our legal landscape there is not much more than can be done. I'm all for red flag laws, but people have to report suspicious behavior and law enforcement and the judicial system have to be able to act on those reports. How many times did PD visit the Parkland shooter's home prior to the shooting? Wasn't it dozens, and still nothing was done?
I will say that within minutes of every mass shooting and even some recent hoaxes, there are people on social media insisting the shooter was trans (usually completely wrong about who the shooter was much less cis/trans identity).
“… A spokesperson for The Violence Project, which records data on mass shootings in the U.S. since 1966 with “four or more” people killed in public (here), told Reuters via email that “Nashville is the first case of a trans” perpetrator in their database and per their methodology. They sent Reuters a database of shootings with 190 entries.
The Gun Violence Archive, which began collecting data on gun violence in the U.S. in 2013 (here), (here), recorded more than 4,400 mass shootings in the last decade, Executive Director Mark Bryant told Reuters via email. Its definition of mass shooting is four or more people shot resulting in injury or death (excluding the perpetrator).
Of those, “the number of known suspects in mass shootings which are trans is under 10 for the last decade,” which translated to “1:880 [or 0.11%] of the 4,400 shootings” they recorded, he said.
Further, the U.S. Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center (NTAC), which studies all forms of targeted violence including mass casualty attacks, published a report with data from 2016 to 2020 (here).
The report examined 173 attacks in the U.S. that “that resulted in harm to three or more individuals in public locations,” Justine Whelan, press secretary for the U.S. Secret Service, told Reuters via email, and “three attackers (2%) were transgender, assigned female at birth, but were known to identify as male at the time of their attacks.”
Whelan said that consistent with previous analyses of mass attacks, “nearly all of the attackers,” or 96%, in the study were male, and the remaining five attackers were female….”
![]()
Fact Check: Majority of US mass shooters are cis men, not transgender or non-binary people
A list of perpetrators in four shootings in the U.S. who identified as transgender or non-binary represent the minority of suspects in mass shootings, but users online are sharing the list without this context. Data collection on mass shootings varies by methodology, but experts told Reuters...www.reuters.com
That data is flawed though because all mass shootings are not the same…
“… A spokesperson for The Violence Project, which records data on mass shootings in the U.S. since 1966 with “four or more” people killed in public (here), told Reuters via email that “Nashville is the first case of a trans” perpetrator in their database and per their methodology. They sent Reuters a database of shootings with 190 entries.
The Gun Violence Archive, which began collecting data on gun violence in the U.S. in 2013 (here), (here), recorded more than 4,400 mass shootings in the last decade, Executive Director Mark Bryant told Reuters via email. Its definition of mass shooting is four or more people shot resulting in injury or death (excluding the perpetrator).
Of those, “the number of known suspects in mass shootings which are trans is under 10 for the last decade,” which translated to “1:880 [or 0.11%] of the 4,400 shootings” they recorded, he said.
Further, the U.S. Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center (NTAC), which studies all forms of targeted violence including mass casualty attacks, published a report with data from 2016 to 2020 (here).
The report examined 173 attacks in the U.S. that “that resulted in harm to three or more individuals in public locations,” Justine Whelan, press secretary for the U.S. Secret Service, told Reuters via email, and “three attackers (2%) were transgender, assigned female at birth, but were known to identify as male at the time of their attacks.”
Whelan said that consistent with previous analyses of mass attacks, “nearly all of the attackers,” or 96%, in the study were male, and the remaining five attackers were female….”
![]()
Fact Check: Majority of US mass shooters are cis men, not transgender or non-binary people
A list of perpetrators in four shootings in the U.S. who identified as transgender or non-binary represent the minority of suspects in mass shootings, but users online are sharing the list without this context. Data collection on mass shootings varies by methodology, but experts told Reuters...www.reuters.com
If you're going to engage ZZLPHeels about guns, just be ready for all the logical fallacies and nonsensical arguments that the Republican Party has been able to create on this topic.Law abiding citizens shouldn’t be punished? I guess the dead kids were all criminals if law abiding citizens aren’t being punished.
What do you suggest?If you're going to engage ZZLPHeels about guns, just be ready for all the logical fallacies and nonsensical arguments that the Republican Party has been able to create on this topic.
I can sum it up, though, with... "We've tried nothing and we're all out of ideas."
I guess the 8 and 10 year olds weren't praying quite hard enough for God to save them.An 8 year old and a 10 year old were killed. 14 kids injured and 3 adults. I can't imagine being a kid and their parents that go through this.