Mr. Morality sure looks the other way a lot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The media has been somewhat better (though hardly effective) at pressing Trump apologists than Trump himself.
That's one hell of an article, which I would title, "Right Wing Media Has Convinced All of You Rubes That Up is Down."This same kind of partisan inversion has been documented several times in various ways over many years now, but Republicans and Trump voters prefer Harris's and Democratic agenda without realizing which party the policies are congruent with.
I find I'm never persuaded (but often irritated) by the Trumpian "and you know it" tactic.That is not "somewhat better," and you know it. That journalist is a coward and incompetant.
It's not Trumpian by nature. This is a very old rhetorical approach in the "speaking truth to power" tradition of American politics. It's most effective when it's applied to something obvious and undeniable, and it's easily misused, but there's a long history of that type of appeal. It's like saying, "this is so obvious that you can't possibly believe otherwise."I find I'm never persuaded (but often irritated) by the Trumpian "and you know it" tactic.
It's not Trumpian by nature. This is a very old rhetorical approach in the "speaking truth to power" tradition of American politics. It's most effective when it's applied to something obvious and undeniable, and it's easily misused, but there's a long history of that type of appeal. It's like saying, "this is so obvious that you can't possibly believe otherwise."
Just to take one example: Here's Biden in 2008: "Because the truth of the matter is, and you know it, that American dream under eight years of Bush and McCain, that American dream is slipping away. I don't have to tell you that. You feel it in your lives. "
I find I have no patience with the intentional acquiescence to the cowardly excuse for interviewing that has emerged since 2016 and the rise of the Trump cult. The manifestation and infestation of this problem is now pervasive, and in fact with what you do on this board--the relaying of almost all things that happen in news and commentaries--makes you in a tiny way a part of the media, in a sense. Then, if you mildly editorialize in the particular way that you did, I find that I "feel" persuaded to say that you know that interviewer simply stopped pursuit of a brazen, destructive lie, and that by that inaction he allows some watching to conclude the person is correct, or as bad, that the topic doesn't really matter, and this is absolutely not an example of being "somewhat better" in pressing Trump cultists on such lies.I find I'm never persuaded (but often irritated) by the Trumpian "and you know it" tactic.
I don't speak meme. What does this mean?
All fairI find I have no patience with the intentional acquiescence to the cowardly excuse for interviewing that has emerged since 2016 and the rise of the Trump cult. The manifestation and infestation of this problem is now pervasive, and in fact with what you do on this board--the relaying of almost all things that happen in news and commentaries--makes you in a tiny way a part of the media, in a sense. Then, if you mildly editorialize in the particular way that you did, I find that I "feel" persuaded to say that you know that interviewer simply stopped pursuit of a brazen, destructive lie, and that by that inaction he allows some watching to conclude the person is correct, or as bad, that the topic doesn't really matter, and this is absolutely not an example of being "somewhat better" in pressing Trump cultists on such lies.
It's what we keep on seeing, what has caused immense problems, and what I have no patience for.
The media has been somewhat better (though hardly effective) at pressing Trump apologists than Trump himself.