Movies Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rock
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 459
  • Views: 10K
  • Off-Topic 
Yeah, it’s okay.
I didn’t really care for it. I liked the characters and personal storyline fine, but if a movie is called Civil War, I need to know why we’re fighting. How did Texas and California end up on the same side fighting against the US.
 
I didn’t really care for it. I liked the characters and personal storyline fine, but if a movie is called Civil War, I need to know why we’re fighting. How did Texas and California end up on the same side fighting against the US.
This is 100 percent of what the director did not want to do. It raises questions of whether war journalism is any kind of cure for political tribalism, a mindset that war is the endpoint of, and how motivations of telling the truth can be lost to adrenaline thrills of being in the mix. Those states as allies reflect the utterly unpredictable chaos fascism taking hold might have, and how total power in the Oval Office might foster the strangest of all bedfellows, but to go into that is never any point the film is after. I thought it was one of the most unusual war films ever made, and one of the best of 2024. The ending of the film does not imply something good will follow--at all. All I felt at the end was the horror of human tribalism and its endpoints in the modern world.

Currently, I think we could be heading for something like the film depicts, but it's just one of multiple bad scenarios.
 
Weapons is... something. Just wow. One of the most bizarre story contraptions I have ever seen to tell a horror story. Starts as a mystery and slow burns into character studies and, boom, freakish horror. Fine acting performances, and a giant story subtext metaphor for a major problem in American society. Major Tarantino type ending, but this is better than his stuff.

One of only three films where I have ever really liked the tactic of going back in time repeatedly to show the tale from different viewpoints, the others being masterpieces Rashomon and The Killing.
 
I didn’t really care for it. I liked the characters and personal storyline fine, but if a movie is called Civil War, I need to know why we’re fighting. How did Texas and California end up on the same side fighting against the US.
Agreed, it wasn't what I was expecting and really needed more direction and development.
 
Agreed, it wasn't what I was expecting and really needed more direction and development.
I really enjoyed (not sure that’s the right word) the film and thought is was pretty damn good. Definitely thought-provoking and depressing given our current political climate.
 
This is 100 percent of what the director did not want to do. It raises questions of whether war journalism is any kind of cure for political tribalism, a mindset that war is the endpoint of, and how motivations of telling the truth can be lost to adrenaline thrills of being in the mix. Those states as allies reflect the utterly unpredictable chaos fascism taking hold might have, and how total power in the Oval Office might foster the strangest of all bedfellows, but to go into that is never any point the film is after. I thought it was one of the most unusual war films ever made, and one of the best of 2024. The ending of the film does not imply something good will follow--at all. All I felt at the end was the horror of human tribalism and its endpoints in the modern world.

Currently, I think we could be heading for something like the film depicts, but it's just one of multiple bad scenarios.
It's been awhile since I watched it, so maybe I'm not remembering correctly, but I didn't glean a lot of understanding of how they got there and the state of the country other than simply being at war. I was fine with the perspective of war reporters and wasn't looking for a "war" movie or blood and guts.
 
Weapons is... something. Just wow. One of the most bizarre story contraptions I have ever seen to tell a horror story. Starts as a mystery and slow burns into character studies and, boom, freakish horror. Fine acting performances, and a giant story subtext metaphor for a major problem in American society. Major Tarantino type ending, but this is better than his stuff.

One of only three films where I have ever really liked the tactic of going back in time repeatedly to show the tale from different viewpoints, the others being masterpieces Rashomon and The Killing.
Might watch this coming weekend.

It's this our Nobody 2, it's up to the kids.
 
This is 100 percent of what the director did not want to do. It raises questions of whether war journalism is any kind of cure for political tribalism, a mindset that war is the endpoint of, and how motivations of telling the truth can be lost to adrenaline thrills of being in the mix. Those states as allies reflect the utterly unpredictable chaos fascism taking hold might have, and how total power in the Oval Office might foster the strangest of all bedfellows, but to go into that is never any point the film is after. I thought it was one of the most unusual war films ever made, and one of the best of 2024. The ending of the film does not imply something good will follow--at all. All I felt at the end was the horror of human tribalism and its endpoints in the modern world.

Currently, I think we could be heading for something like the film depicts, but it's just one of multiple bad scenarios.
Yes. Getting caught up in the backstory details of how they arrived at that situation is not what the movie was aiming for. It would’ve been too easy for viewers to choose who their good guys were and who their bad guys were, depending on political persuasion.

The point was to be dropped into the middle of it and use ambiguity and blurred lines to unite the viewers in witnessing the ugliness of tribalism. In fact, it was brilliant to have CA and TX join forces, not only because that would be a formidable force… but because it immediately undermines the current good guy vs. bad guy constructs we have in mind, no matter which side you’re on. Once I saw that, it was my cue to toss those constructs out the window and settle in.

But I can see people losing patience with it if they were trying to watch it from a linear perspective and felt like puzzle pieces were missing. That’s just not at all what it was aiming for.
 
Last edited:
1754938214033.jpeg
Watched this one over the weekend outdoors with a big crowd on the beach in Coney Island. Which if you know the movie, is a pretty damn cool way to watch it.
 
Just as a courtesy if needed, this film has violence and body horror that younger kids should almost certainly not see.
Thank you for that information. Fortunately my youngest is 20. She really loves horror movies and wants to see this. I've only watched one trailer and an not sure i understand the concept fully. I'll have to read a little more.
 
Weapons is... something. Just wow. One of the most bizarre story contraptions I have ever seen to tell a horror story. Starts as a mystery and slow burns into character studies and, boom, freakish horror. Fine acting performances, and a giant story subtext metaphor for a major problem in American society. Major Tarantino type ending, but this is better than his stuff.

One of only three films where I have ever really liked the tactic of going back in time repeatedly to show the tale from different viewpoints, the others being masterpieces Rashomon and The Killing.
What is the giant problem in society that you're referring to?
 
No spoilers
No, there's enough in my post for now, and I think UNCatTech should not read anything on the film before seeing it. Just sit down in the theater seat and buckle your mental seatbelt for quite a ride. The metaphor I mention is not prominent, and gets lost until you ponder it later on.
 
No, there's enough in my post for now, and I think UNCatTech should not read anything on the film before seeing it. Just sit down in the theater seat and buckle your mental seatbelt for quite a ride. The metaphor I mention is not prominent, and gets lost until you ponder it later on.
The metaphor is obvious
 
Watched Steven Soderbergh’s “Presence” last night and really liked it. Small budget, art house, slow burn psychological thriller / ghost story that I appreciated for the setup and not cheating in its storytelling.

Not a horror movie if you think of horror movies as pulse pounding and jump scares, but disquieting portrait of a family in the brink and how hard raising teenagers can be.

IMG_8856.jpeg
 
Back
Top