Raphael Warnock knows the way forward

  • Thread starter Thread starter superrific
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 68
  • Views: 845
  • Politics 
Are you being sarcastic? Watch that ad again. Almost everyone in it is white. The soundtrack is fucking Simon and Garfunkel, which is probably the whitest music this side of the Eagles. There's one black person on screen for less than half a second. There are two other glimpses of people of color, who look more South Asian to me but whatever.

There are more white farmers in that ad than minorities. You know, 'cause if there's anyone black and Latino people love, it's white farmers in Iowa. And then Bernie wonders why he didn't have support among black voters . . .
It’s because that ad was in January of 2016. New Hampshire and Iowa have a lot of white people. You know this though. Latino voters supported Bernie strongly in 2020, and he performed better with Black voters than his 2016 run, especially young Black voters.
 
It’s because that ad was in January of 2016. New Hampshire and Iowa have a lot of white people. You know this though. Latino voters supported Bernie strongly in 2020, and he performed better with Black voters than his 2016 run, especially young Black voters.
No, I didn't know when that ad was created. But why can't we show black people to white folks in Iowa and New Hampshire? That ad is making my point. If you disregard race in America, then there's a lot more that seems possible. As soon as you put black people in the picture, those white folks in Iowa and New Hampshire get really uncomfortable. That is our challenge, and pretending that it isn't is not a winning strategy. It's just pipe dreaming.

This election, like most of GOP politics for the last decade, was about draining the pool.
 
No, I didn't know when that ad was created. But why can't we show black people to white folks in Iowa and New Hampshire? That ad is making my point. If you disregard race in America, then there's a lot more that seems possible. As soon as you put black people in the picture, those white folks in Iowa and New Hampshire get really uncomfortable. That is our challenge, and pretending that it isn't is not a winning strategy. It's just pipe dreaming.

This election, like most of GOP politics for the last decade, was about draining the pool.
Super, it was January of 2016. Where do you think Bernie was holding all of his rallies in January of 2016? Where do you think the footage from this ad came from?

Literally just watch any other Sanders ad and your point is disproven. He had the widest base of nonwhite support in 2020.
 
Because people are using it as an all-purpose excuse to push their priorities. Before we can think about our messaging problems, we need to have a plan. Plan comes first, then messaging.

I'm not attached to preachy language policing but that's not really a Dem thing as much as it's an on-campus liberal thing. And I don't think that's what people mean by messaging. But sure, if that's our messaging problem, and that's what we need to correct, fine.

I really don't understand the critique of "mealy-mouthed non-answers" when that's literally all the GOP has served up for a decade or longer. If it works for Trump and JD Vance, why shouldn't it work for us? I don't know about aloof tone, except to say that the GOP seems pretty damn aloof to me.

But the main point is that messaging is a feature of a plan, not an excuse for not having one. And messaging is a real challenge when the people who need to hear the messages aren't hearing them.
The messaging part to me is synonymous with outreach and communication, and I feel like you could have the perfect plan but still fail badly because your outreach/comms sucked.

There are signs that Dem policy just got buried and or entirely overpowered by counter-messaging.

Do we even know how bad the Dem policy/plan was given that it failed to reach people or provide the vibes that came from the rightwing? I mean, in the past week it has been riddled with bullets, but there are more questions than answers still. Her stance wasn't that different from many Dem senators in Swing states who won. If those senators only won due to low-info voters then the problem could easily be comms/outreach to low-info voters moreso than plan/policy.
 
If there was a "coup" (besides the Putin thumb on the scale) it was the DNC stonewalling Sanders when he had momentum in 2016. He would have crushed Trump.
This is nonsense. I will repeat it until I'm blue in the face. Bernie Sanders was never and will never be the Democratic nominee for President. He's not a Democrat. The Democratic Party would never support a nominee who isn't a Democrat.
 
This is nonsense. I will repeat it until I'm blue in the face. Bernie Sanders was never and will never be the Democratic nominee for President. He's not a Democrat. The Democratic Party would never support a nominee who isn't a Democrat.
If Democrats hated Bernie so much, why was it necessary to sandbag him in 2016 and 2020? Shouldn’t he have lost without that kind of interference if your theory is correct?

What you’re really saying is: Democratic Party insiders would never support Bernie as the nominee. Him not being a Democrat was a convenient way to dismiss him. Plenty of rank-and-file Democrats, including myself, were more than willing to support him.
 
Bernie Sanders lost in 2020 because black voters don't like him. Period. We all know what happened.
I think it was more so about every other candidate dropping out to endorse Biden when it was clear that Sanders had a ton of momentum.

You can look at his numbers with Black voters in 2020. It’s not true that they didn’t like him. Stop lying.

He wasn’t even fully running when a lot of these states had their primaries in 2020. It was during Covid.
 
If you're referring to me, I definitely didn't say that because I would never use that word.

Here's a tip: during the middle of a hotly contested election is not the greatest time to be telling liberals that there is something wrong with the Democratic Party. If you think you're going to get buy-in on "we suck" from people all-in trying to win the election, I mean what are we doing here? A lot of us were out on the campaign trail working with the Democratic Party. There are so many good people making a real difference, so many people who were busting their ass and putting in time and money and blood and tears to get us to victory. Shitting on the Democrats during that campaign is never, ever going to be well received.

Obviously the election put things in a different light. And since everyone else is offering their own election post-mortems, I will offer mine. Of this I am quite confident: moving "left" is a bad strategy that Democrats will not adopt because it is a bad strategy. Moving to Bernie Sanders politics is probably the worst idea possible.

Stick to what has always worked for us. "In order for my children to be OK, I need my neighbors' children to be OK" is a message that is more or less undefeated when we've run with it. We can't always run with it, because it's a campaign message. It's not a governance message. It works best when people are feeling hopeless -- which is to say, when Republicans are in control. But I cannot think of a major campaign that liberals have undertaken with this message that has lost. WJC's campaign embraced some of this.
True, not great timing. But the context around the comment was to address the accusations being made on here at the time. The......."what's wrong with the voters and why won't they vote for Harris" type of comments. About three and half weeks before the elections was when that stuff was running wild on here. Then she started a uptick in the polls and things settled down a bit on that front.
 
If Democrats hated Bernie so much, why was it necessary to sandbag him in 2016 and 2020? Shouldn’t he have lost without that kind of interference if your theory is correct?
And here we go! In my experience, Bernie Sanders supporters always end up in the conspiracy bullshit eventually. Joe Biden won twice the votes as Bernie Sanders during the primary. HRC beat him by about 12 points.
 
And here we go! In my experience, Bernie Sanders supporters always end up in the conspiracy bullshit eventually. Joe Biden won twice the votes as Bernie Sanders during the primary. HRC beat him by about 12 points.
Not a conspiracy.
 
I think it was more so about every other candidate dropping out to endorse Biden when it was clear that Sanders had a ton of momentum.

You can look at his numbers with Black voters in 2020. It’s not true that they didn’t like him. Stop lying.

He wasn’t even fully running when a lot of these states had their primaries in 2020. It was during Covid.

Stop gaslighting. You've now completely destroyed your credibility. Everybody here knows how and why Bernie lost. Biden cleaned up with black voters in SC. Only after that did anyone else drop out. Also, why do you think all the other candidates endorsed Biden? Elizabeth Warren endorsed Biden. I mean, what the fuck are you even talking about here?
 
If Democrats hated Bernie so much, why was it necessary to sandbag him in 2016 and 2020? Shouldn’t he have lost without that kind of interference if your theory is correct?

What you’re really saying is: Democratic Party insiders would never support Bernie as the nominee. Him not being a Democrat was a convenient way to dismiss him. Plenty of rank-and-file Democrats, including myself, were more than willing to support him.
Plenty < a majority.
 
Last edited:
True, not great timing. But the context around the comment was to address the accusations being made on here at the time. The......."what's wrong with the voters and why won't they vote for Harris" type of comments. About three and half weeks before the elections was when that stuff was running wild on here. Then she started a uptick in the polls and things settled down a bit on that front.
All right, fine. In the future, if you're expecting me to crap on my party during the campaign, you're going to be disappointed. Even if what you say is 100% accurate.
 
Plenty < a majority.

Paine is basically a main-character syndrome poster.
Do you understand how rich that is coming from you? You’ve started two threads today about what you think the Democratic strategy should be. The first one got no traction so you started a second.

Anyone else saying I had main character syndrome, I’d take a second to analyze it. Coming from you? Jesus Christ.
 
Do you understand how rich that is coming from you? You’ve started two threads today about what you think the Democratic strategy should be. The first one got no traction so you started a second.

Anyone else saying I had main character syndrome, I’d take a second to analyze it. Coming from you? Jesus Christ.
Main character syndrome is about generalizing from your own experience as if that experience is factually representative of the world. I am not going to argue with you about this. I will let people judge for themselves. But plenty is not a majority. That's a fact, and not just in my own experience.
 
Main character syndrome is about generalizing from your own experience as if that experience is factually representative of the world. I am not going to argue with you about this. I will let people judge for themselves. But plenty is not a majority. That's a fact, and not just in my own experience.
Brother I’m 25. I know what main character syndrome is. Thank you for explaining that to me though. It’s probably about the 80th time you’ve explained something to me that I’m already aware of. It’s just as patronizing the 80th time as it was the 1st.
 
Brother I’m 25. I know what main character syndrome is. Thank you for explaining that to me though. It’s probably about the 80th time you’ve explained something to me that I’m already aware of. It’s just as patronizing the 80th time as it was the 1st.
I take back that allegation because it's not how I want to be communicating. I am just tired of hearing bullshit about how Bernie would have won if only the world wasn't aligned against him. He ran twice. He didn't really come close either time. Young leftists love him. Other people don't. It's a hard lesson to learn that the people who should be liked aren't. This is a perennial problem with youth politics, and I won't except myself from when I was young.


BTW This is a message board, not a private dialogue. I frequently post for the benefit of posters who aren't necessarily participating in the discussion.
 
I take back that allegation because it's not how I want to be communicating. I am just tired of hearing bullshit about how Bernie would have won if only the world wasn't aligned against him. He ran twice. He didn't really come close either time. Young leftists love him. Other people don't. It's a hard lesson to learn that the people who should be liked aren't. This is a perennial problem with youth politics, and I won't except myself from when I was young.


BTW This is a message board, not a private dialogue. I frequently post for the benefit of posters who aren't necessarily participating in the discussion.
Clearly I just need to stop mentioning Bernie at all. Something about him makes liberal Democrats foam at the mouth when they would otherwise agree with what I’m saying.

Getting back to the topic at hand, I think there is something to be said for harnessing Christianity in a certain way. In many ways, Christianity birthed liberalism.

The point I was making was that civil rights and economic rights have always been connected at the hip in America. Language of economic rights was a huge part of the civil rights movement in the 60s. These two things are supposed to coexist. I only brought Bernie up because he was an active participant in the civil rights movement and that informs his politics.

MLK was socialist for God’s sake. This stuff has a deep tradition.
 
Back
Top