Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-CA, accused of wrongdoing. Update: Resigning from Congress

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rock
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 269
  • Views: 4K
  • Politics 
The point here, numbnuts, is that whenever it's a Dem, it is quickly condemned by the Dem party and appropriate action is taken. When it's a Pub, it's ignored or denied and distracted from until the news cycle changes and everybody moves on. The Pubs are no longer the party of morals and family values—and haven't been for a very long time. Which is why I left the party years ago to become a forever Indy.
Hey numbnut.

The Democrats benefitted by getting Swalwell out of the race. He was the leading polling Democrat and he was still in third place in the polling behind two Republicans because the Democratic vote was being split so many different ways. For months, the Democrats have been pushing people to drop out of the race.

Now that Swalwell is out, it virtually assures that Steyer or Porter will finish in the top 2 in the jungle primary, which means that California will elect a Democratic governor in November.

The last people that wanted to see Swalwell drop out of the race were California Republicans. So please drop the Democrats are the party of goodness and light crap. This was 100% pushed by the Steyer and Porter campaigns.
 
Hey numbnut.

The Democrats benefitted by getting Swalwell out of the race. He was the leading polling Democrat and he was still in third place in the polling behind two Republicans because the Democratic vote was being split so many different ways. For months, the Democrats have been pushing people to drop out of the race.

Now that Swalwell is out, it virtually assures that Steyer or Porter will finish in the top 2 in the jungle primary, which means that California will elect a Democratic governor in November.

The last people that wanted to see Swalwell drop out of the race were California Republicans. So please drop the Democrats are the party of goodness and light crap. This was 100% pushed by the Steyer and Porter campaigns.
both things are true here.

dems benefit by swalwell dropping out of this race AND dems hold their members to much higher ethical standards than pubs.
 
both things are true here.

dems benefit by swalwell dropping out of this race AND dems hold their members to much higher ethical standards than pubs.
Yes, that is 100% true.

It is just that Swalwell should not be the poster child for that point. We have Franken, Weiner, Menendez, Cuomo, Spitzer, half of Illinois governors, etc., etc. who have quit/lost because of their scandals.

On the Republican side, there is George Santos and ? Maybe Duncan Hunter way back in the day (and his well travelled bunny).
 
Yes, that is 100% true.

It is just that Swalwell should not be the poster child for that point. We have Franken, Weiner, Menendez, Cuomo, Spitzer, half of Illinois governors, etc., etc. who have quit/lost because of their scandals.

On the Republican side, there is George Santos and ? Maybe Duncan Hunter way back in the day (and his well travelled bunny).
Wasn't Santos pardoned by Trump?
 
The point here, numbnuts, is that whenever it's a Dem, it is quickly condemned by the Dem party and appropriate action is taken. When it's a Pub, it's ignored or denied and distracted from until the news cycle changes and everybody moves on. The Pubs are no longer the party of morals and family values—and haven't been for a very long time. Which is why I left the party years ago to become a forever Indy.
You're trying to give Dems credit when none is due. This is obviously a hit job by his own party to narrow the field for the California Governor's race since, at this point, it appears two Republicans are going to be the top two finishers in the jungle primary. He's an easy make since everyone in DC and California has known what a complete dirt bag he is. When he was useful to the Dems as a hatchet man Pelosi et al put up with him. When it was convenient to dump on him, they did.

And even when the Dems "condemned" Swalwell notice they only demanded that he quit the Governor's race NOT the US Congress. Only after being shamed by the media, did some Dems call for his resignation from Congress.
 
Last edited:
You're trying to give Dems credit when none is due. This is obviously a hit job by his own party to narrow the field for the California Governor's race since, at this point, it appears two Republicans are going to be the top two finishers in the jungle primary. He's an easy make since everyone in DC and California has known what a complete dirt bag he is. When he was useful to the Dems as a hatchet man Pelosi et al put up with him. When it was convenient to dump on him, they did.

And even when the Dems "condemned" Swalwell notice they only demanded that he quit the Governor's race NOT the US Congress. Only after being shamed by the media, did some Dems call for his resignation from Congress.
You're so right. We Dems are awful, awful people and so hypocritical. We lost our hero in Swalwell. He was my favorite. We'll miss him so! 😭

1776102085523.png
 
You're trying to give Dems credit when none is due. This is obviously a hit job by his own party to narrow the field for the California Governor's race since, at this point, it appears two Republicans are going to be the top two finishers in the jungle primary. He's an easy make since everyone in DC and California has known what a complete dirt bag he is. When he was useful to the Dems as a hatchet man Pelosi et al put up with him. When it was convenient to dump on him, they did.

And even when the Dems "condemned" Swalwell notice they only demanded that he quit the Governor's race NOT the US Congress. Only after being shamed by the media, did some Dems call for his resignation from Congress.
Tell you what, just like the Hawaii/Alaska agreement, why don't we go halfsies on Congress. Let's pass a joint resolution to kick out both Swalwell and Gonzalez. Deal? I'm sure Democrats would be virtually unanimous in passing that resolution.
 
Yes, that is 100% true.

It is just that Swalwell should not be the poster child for that point. We have Franken, Weiner, Menendez, Cuomo, Spitzer, half of Illinois governors, etc., etc. who have quit/lost because of their scandals.

On the Republican side, there is George Santos and ? Maybe Duncan Hunter way back in the day (and his well travelled bunny).
No shit, Sherlock. That was my point.
 
You're trying to give Dems credit when none is due. This is obviously a hit job by his own party to narrow the field for the California Governor's race since, at this point, it appears two Republicans are going to be the top two finishers in the jungle primary. He's an easy make since everyone in DC and California has known what a complete dirt bag he is. When he was useful to the Dems as a hatchet man Pelosi et al put up with him. When it was convenient to dump on him, they did.

And even when the Dems "condemned" Swalwell notice they only demanded that he quit the Governor's race NOT the US Congress. Only after being shamed by the media, did some Dems call for his resignation from Congress.
I'm not giving the Dems credit. What they show is how depraved your side truly is.

Note that you are implicitly discounting the allegations, which is par for the course. Your entire party -- and definitely you -- love rapist logic.
 
You're trying to give Dems credit when none is due. This is obviously a hit job by his own party to narrow the field for the California Governor's race since, at this point, it appears two Republicans are going to be the top two finishers in the jungle primary. He's an easy make since everyone in DC and California has known what a complete dirt bag he is. When he was useful to the Dems as a hatchet man Pelosi et al put up with him. When it was convenient to dump on him, they did.

And even when the Dems "condemned" Swalwell notice they only demanded that he quit the Governor's race NOT the US Congress. Only after being shamed by the media, did some Dems call for his resignation from Congress.
If Pubs had done the right thing once in the last decade for one of their own cases of sexual misconduct, I might actually put some thought into what you have to say on the topic... Dems have consistently done the right thing, whether it hurt them or not. So the fact that Dems may benefit from doing the right thing rings hollow as a criticism in this case.
 
And morals had nothing to do with Swalwell getting out of this race.
Nothing? Really? REALLY?

I think the shock from Cesar Chavez has an effect here. First, the importance of not turning a blind eye. Second, that we can successfully distinguish a man and his legacy. There was no pushback from Chavez supporters. All at once, everyone renamed Chavez-related objects or institutions, and yet they renamed them to honor the causes Chavez championed. In other words, no dissension, no fighting.

I think the Dems also learned from the Biden fiasco after the debate. Which explains the Chavez and Swalwell responses.
 
Nothing? Really? REALLY?

I think the shock from Cesar Chavez has an effect here. First, the importance of not turning a blind eye. Second, that we can successfully distinguish a man and his legacy. There was no pushback from Chavez supporters. All at once, everyone renamed Chavez-related objects or institutions, and yet they renamed them to honor the causes Chavez championed. In other words, no dissension, no fighting.

I think the Dems also learned from the Biden fiasco after the debate. Which explains the Chavez and Swalwell responses.
OK, maybe 1%.

The rest was a realpolitk play. The other Dems worked the story, got reporters to publish it, which gave the establishment the leverage it needed to push him out of the race. There is basically no chance this story ever sees the light of day if Swalwell hadn't decided to run for governor.
 
There is basically no chance this story ever sees the light of day if Swalwell hadn't decided to run for governor.
Even if that is true, it doesn't mean that morals had nothing to do with it. What you are saying is that Swalwell's rivals schemed to publish a story that would force him out of the race. Fine. But the only reason that would work is that Dems demand that our candidates not be sexually violent.
 
Even if that is true, it doesn't mean that morals had nothing to do with it. What you are saying is that Swalwell's rivals schemed to publish a story that would force him out of the race. Fine. But the only reason that would work is that Dems demand that our candidates not be sexually violent.
5%?

Yes, if he were a Republican, he would still be running. No doubt about that.
 
You're trying to give Dems credit when none is due. This is obviously a hit job by his own party to narrow the field for the California Governor's race since, at this point, it appears two Republicans are going to be the top two finishers in the jungle primary. He's an easy make since everyone in DC and California has known what a complete dirt bag he is. When he was useful to the Dems as a hatchet man Pelosi et al put up with him. When it was convenient to dump on him, they did.

And even when the Dems "condemned" Swalwell notice they only demanded that he quit the Governor's race NOT the US Congress. Only after being shamed by the media, did some Dems call for his resignation from Congress.
So, let me get this straight...

If the Dems ignored it (as we know any Pub would), they'd be evil. If they demanded Swalwell drop out, they're still evil. Did I catch that right?
Man, what a cute little world you've created for yourself. And all while worshipping a convicted felon who's all over the Epstein files and likens himself to Jesus Christ in grand displays of blasphemy? Like, who wouldn't want to be you?
 
Back
Top