RFK Jr, HHs & MAHA | CDC RIF massacre

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 54K
  • Politics 
finesse said:
If they had left some reputable people in charge of doing that who had a sense of priorities, I'd not have much of a problem. Firing them and leaving it to crackpots and dingbats don't do so much for me.
Click to expand...
“Dingbat?” - You just insulted Edith Bunker. Seriously, we are in a world of shit since 1/20/25.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
What I see is a lot of "we are going to look at how we prescribe ADHD meds or how we administer vaccines" and it becomes "my kid won't be able to get vaccines or ADHD meds."
Click to expand...
Maybe that's because the guy who said that has been advocating banning those meds and vaccines for 25 years.

See, there's a constraint that maybe you don't know about. The Administrative Procedure Act requires substantial evidence to justify agency rulemaking. So whatever their intent, they have to first order it to be studied. Then when the study comes back, they can act on it. But of course the study will produce the evidence they want, and then we're going to have to sue to overturn.

There's also another really important issue, which is that HHS determines the supply cap for all controlled substances, including Ritalin and ADHD meds. Kennedy could lower that cap, creating shortages.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
That is what he said. Here is the relevant part of the quote.

"...because their immune system is better than ours.” —RFK Jr
Click to expand...
That's your sanewashing. The relevant part of the quote is that he stated that black people shouldn't get the same vaccinations as white people. That is so patently wrong and such an incredible mischaracterization of the studies both he and you are referencing.
 
wmheel1287 said:
That's your sanewashing. The relevant part of the quote is that he stated that black people shouldn't get the same vaccinations as white people. That is so patently wrong and such an incredible mischaracterization of the studies both he and you are referencing.
Click to expand...
Here is the entire quote. It says the two groups shouldn't get the same vaccination schedule. It does not say they shouldn't get the same vaccinations. Your statement is so patently wrong and such an incredible mischaracterization of what he said.

“We should not be giving Black people the same vaccine schedule that’s given to Whites, because their immune system is better than ours.” —RFK Jr.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
Here is the entire quote. It says the two groups shouldn't get the same vaccination schedule. It does not say they shouldn't get the same vaccinations. Your statement is so patently wrong and such an incredible mischaracterization of what he said.

“We should not be giving Black people the same vaccine schedule that’s given to Whites, because their immune system is better than ours.” —RFK Jr.
Click to expand...

Given the incredibly lengthy history of discrimination in medical access and treatment, this statement is exceedingly troubling at best.


 
Is this an Administration or a remake of "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest"?
And I have the feeling there is worse to come...Kash Patel ! He's one crazy MF.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
Here is the entire quote. It says the two groups shouldn't get the same vaccination schedule. It does not say they shouldn't get the same vaccinations. Your statement is so patently wrong and such an incredible mischaracterization of what he said.

“We should not be giving Black people the same vaccine schedule that’s given to Whites, because their immune system is better than ours.” —RFK Jr.
Click to expand...
What do you think a vaccination schedule is? Kids get two MMR vaccines. Should black kids only get one? Or should they get different ones? Either way, it's a racist disaster of a comment and shame on you for defending it.

Note: there is no evidence to support that view. But even if you accept the unscientific view that black people have an X% stronger immune response, what conclusions do you draw? Either they should have different vaccines; or they should have fewer vaccines; or the higher immune response has zero relevance. None of these are good for you.
 
StrangePackage said:
Given the incredibly lengthy history of discrimination in medical access and treatment, this statement is exceedingly troubling at best.


Click to expand...
To me, this is providing more resources to the African population based on genetic differences. The medical establishment could keep those of primarily African decent on the same vaccination schedule as people of European decent. I would guess the majority of of participants in the studies that the current vaccination schedule is based on were of European descent. It's what we do today and it may be exactly right.

Or they could devote extra resources to study a population that has a more robust immunological response. They might find they need A lower dose or perhaps a higher dose or vaccinations at different times or they may find that it doesn't matter. But I don't think it's out of line or at all racist to at least devote those resources to study it.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
To me, this is providing more resources to the African population based on genetic differences. The medical establishment could keep those of primarily African decent on the same vaccination schedule as people of European decent. I would guess the majority of of participants in the studies that the current vaccination schedule is based on were of European descent. It's what we do today and it may be exactly right.

Or they could devote extra resources to study a population that has a more robust immunological response. They might find they need A lower dose or perhaps a higher dose or vaccinations at different times or they may find that it doesn't matter. But I don't think it's out of line or at all racist to at least devote those resources to study it.
Click to expand...
What would you take money away from to do this? It's not totally unimportant but I doubt it makes the top 500.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
I have no idea. That's way too into the weeds for me. Do you have a suggestion?
Click to expand...
Yeah. Give someone a small grant to study it and collect more information. You're going to have to have that information to make a decent decision on how or if you need to approach it, so start with the basics and just the basics.
 
finesse said:
Yeah. Give someone a small grant to study it and collect more information. You're going to have to have that information to make a decent decision on how or if you need to approach it, so start with the basics and just the basics.
Click to expand...
Sounds like a pretty good plan. I'm not sure that RFK Jr is proposing anything different than a study based on his quotes.
 
Fwiw, the main focus should be whether there is any damage being done. Any adjustment in scheduling or dosage will overcomplicate the entire vaccination process.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
To me, this is providing more resources to the African population based on genetic differences. The medical establishment could keep those of primarily African decent on the same vaccination schedule as people of European decent. I would guess the majority of of participants in the studies that the current vaccination schedule is based on were of European descent. It's what we do today and it may be exactly right.

Or they could devote extra resources to study a population that has a more robust immunological response. They might find they need A lower dose or perhaps a higher dose or vaccinations at different times or they may find that it doesn't matter. But I don't think it's out of line or at all racist to at least devote those resources to study it.
Click to expand...
But that's not what RFK Jr said. He didn't say, "We need to look into this." Or "We need to study this further." He offered a conclusion.

He made a blanket statement about an entire group of people based on their ethnicity without an objective basis.

What's that called when you do that again?
 
gtyellowjacket said:
Sounds like a pretty good plan. I'm not sure that RFK Jr is proposing anything different than a study based on his quotes.
Click to expand...
1. No policy recommendations can follow from this, because racial classifications are subject to strict scrutiny and there's no way any of that could pass muster under that standard.

2. I don't think you'd like it very much if there was a whole cottage industry devoted to "just asking questions" about whether Ga Tech grads are genetically different from others. We could start asking questions about whether they are less intelligent, more impulsive, less hard-working -- all "subjects" about which white people have been "asking questions." Now the immune system? To what end?

I used to have your view. Like 35 years ago, when I was a freshman in college. What's wrong with gathering information? Then I asked black people about it. They had a very different perspective. They said it was dehumanizing, insulting, a constant distraction, and just downright obnoxious. You might try asking some black people about this view. I predict you would get the same response I did (it's been confirmed many times over in a variety of ways), though I also predict you will lie about doing it, having done it, and what you were told.
 
Kraftyheel89 said:
They might end same sex marriage but not interracial marriage. Clarence Thomas is married to a crazy white Trumper. Then again, he is probably against interracial marriage personally, but would grandfather it for himself. That is the moral character of the pubic hair on coke can man.
Click to expand...
Same sex marriage will not be ending because of Scott Bessent I think.
 
gtyellowjacket said:
Sounds like a pretty good plan. I'm not sure that RFK Jr is proposing anything different than a study based on his quotes.
Click to expand...
Sorry, DODEshit said there would be no grant money.

And, no study that looks at differences in race are permitted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top