RFK Jr, HHs & MAHA | CDC RIF massacre

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 53K
  • Politics 
Mulberry Heel said:
Survival of the fittest. Rich people can just fly to other countries for cancer care, the rest of us will just have to suffer and die painful deaths so conservatives can be happy that the government isn't "wasting" money funding left-wing elite scientists and doctors at left-wing universities and hospitals with their snooty and elitist expert medical research. MAGA, baby!
Click to expand...
That has been going on for years in the United Staes…You know how many I have seen die painful deaths from Cancer…To damn many….The elites just leave the country and get treatment that the normal people can’t afford…
 
superrific said:
Well, I wouldn't trust anything RFK says, so we really have no idea what Trump thinks about it.

What was RFK going to say? "The president doesn't have my back on this?"
Click to expand...
The primary value of this testimony is to try to force Trump to respond at some point and otherwise tattoo RFK’s words in Trump’s forehead (politically speaking).
 
Mulberry Heel said:
Survival of the fittest. Rich people can just fly to other countries for cancer care, the rest of us will just have to suffer and die painful deaths so conservatives can be happy that the government isn't "wasting" money funding left-wing elite scientists and doctors at left-wing universities and hospitals with their snooty and elitist expert medical research. MAGA, baby!
Click to expand...
Trump doesn’t care if you die of cancer. Tie this to him and the MAGA movement.
 




Mullin: “… what day was you fired? … OK what days was the first time you seeked [sic] counsel, not retained, seeked [sic] counsel? … so you retained them the first time you spoke to them? … was you was you let go in the middle of the night? Was you let go in the middle of the day? …
so you got hold of the attorneys late at night? [I’m sorry what?] you got hold of the attorneys after business hours to retain them …

[turning to the trust conversation, she says RFk told her he could not trust her and she said if he can’t trust her he should fire her] “… is that really how that conversation went? Cause there’s other people in the room and I think the conversation went can he trust you and your answer was?

Monarez: “He said he could not trust me”

Mullin: “No. the answer, ma’am, it was a recorded meeting so you can testify one way or you can prove that you’re lying or be honest with this committee. And I’m giving you the opportunity to be honest here cause you’ve been really walking around the edges and not being truthful so did he ask you the question can he trust you and your answer was?”

Monarez: He told me he could not trust me and I told him if he could not trust me he could fire me”

Mullin: “ummm that isn’t how that conversation went. And you know that, don’t you … you have to question you because your personality and your answers aren’t correct …”

BUT

 


“…Cassidy, 10 mins later, chimes in to say because it was invoked in the hearing the recording should now be handed to other committee members. he asks why only one senator was given a recording. he asks Mullin to say if it is real. he asks why a conversation was recorded at all.”
 
Mullin sounds like a plumber cosplaying as a US Senator. Dude doesn't even understand basic subject/verb agreement. The citizens of Oklahoma should be ashamed of electing him to office.

And of course, it turns out he was the one lying in that exchange while accusing Monarez of being dishonest.
 
nycfan said:




Mullin: “… what day was you fired? … OK what days was the first time you seeked [sic] counsel, not retained, seeked [sic] counsel? … so you retained them the first time you spoke to them? … was you was you let go in the middle of the night? Was you let go in the middle of the day? …
so you got hold of the attorneys late at night? [I’m sorry what?] you got hold of the attorneys after business hours to retain them …

[turning to the trust conversation, she says RFk told her he could not trust her and she said if he can’t trust her he should fire her] “… is that really how that conversation went? Cause there’s other people in the room and I think the conversation went can he trust you and your answer was?

Monarez: “He said he could not trust me”

Mullin: “No. the answer, ma’am, it was a recorded meeting so you can testify one way or you can prove that you’re lying or be honest with this committee. And I’m giving you the opportunity to be honest here cause you’ve been really walking around the edges and not being truthful so did he ask you the question can he trust you and your answer was?”

Monarez: He told me he could not trust me and I told him if he could not trust me he could fire me”

Mullin: “ummm that isn’t how that conversation went. And you know that, don’t you … you have to question you because your personality and your answers aren’t correct …”

BUT

Click to expand...

Oopsie.
 
What a piece of shit. He won't let her answer and then says she's not being fully honest.

Of course this was the guy who wanted to physically fight a witness in the committee room.
 
nycfan said:




Mullin: “… what day was you fired? … OK what days was the first time you seeked [sic] counsel, not retained, seeked [sic] counsel? … so you retained them the first time you spoke to them? … was you was you let go in the middle of the night? Was you let go in the middle of the day? …
so you got hold of the attorneys late at night? [I’m sorry what?] you got hold of the attorneys after business hours to retain them …

[turning to the trust conversation, she says RFk told her he could not trust her and she said if he can’t trust her he should fire her] “… is that really how that conversation went? Cause there’s other people in the room and I think the conversation went can he trust you and your answer was?

Monarez: “He said he could not trust me”

Mullin: “No. the answer, ma’am, it was a recorded meeting so you can testify one way or you can prove that you’re lying or be honest with this committee. And I’m giving you the opportunity to be honest here cause you’ve been really walking around the edges and not being truthful so did he ask you the question can he trust you and your answer was?”

Monarez: He told me he could not trust me and I told him if he could not trust me he could fire me”

Mullin: “ummm that isn’t how that conversation went. And you know that, don’t you … you have to question you because your personality and your answers aren’t correct …”

BUT

Click to expand...

He should be censured for that. That’s the same kind of dumbfuck redneck attitude that’s previously led to an exchange with a witness about “taking it outside.”
 
superrific said:
What a piece of shit. He won't let her answer and then says she's not being fully honest.

Of course this was the guy who wanted to physically fight a witness in the committee room.
Click to expand...
The witness was acting the same way. The exchange was between 2 middle-aged “men” that wanted to settle their differences with fists. Both of them are giant douche bags. This culture of tough guys that stopped maturing at 17, that view growth as a weakness, and claim to be leaders might be doing a bit of harm to society.
 
Molotov Mocktail said:
The witness was acting the same way. The exchange was between 2 middle-aged “men” that wanted to settle their differences with fists. Both of them are giant douche bags. This culture of tough guys that stopped maturing at 17, that view growth as a weakness, and claim to be leaders might be doing a bit of harm to society.
Click to expand...
But Markwayne instigated it, and anyway, a US Senator should always, under every conceivable circumstance, decline to physically accost with a congressional witness.
 
Molotov Mocktail said:
The witness was acting the same way. The exchange was between 2 middle-aged “men” that wanted to settle their differences with fists. Both of them are giant douche bags. This culture of tough guys that stopped maturing at 17, that view growth as a weakness, and claim to be leaders might be doing a bit of harm to society.
Click to expand...
That was Teamsters head Sean O’Brien.

They’ve apparently kissed and made up.

Markwayne said this past winter/spring after approving of Trump’s labor secretary nominee, “I do joke with my new friend over here, which I had the mic and he can’t defend himself here, that if we were in a relationship, I’d be the man in the relationship.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top