I think you're getting a little too worked up over this.
Where did I make that claim? It's in print right there where you quoted me " aborted human debris" is what I'm discussing. That is not the same as human DNA. Now, fuck off and die for the benefit of the human race. TDTL
Is the soul distributed among all the cells and if so, is it equitable or do some get a lesser portion? In which organelles does the soul reside? On first principles I’d think the nucleus, but there’s a strong, if philosophically contentious, case to be made for mitochondria.
Sorry you got upset. Science can be scary. Let me know if you can calm down and want to discuss it. I'll stop talking about it with you until then.
I’ve got an idea for a horror movie franchise about this. I’d call it Reviewer Number Three. So far none of the studious has called me back.
The manuscript would be improved if all the experiments were to be replicated using a different cell line and a different time course. Also the Y-axis on supplemental figure 6 would be better expressed on log2 scale.
They don't sound that studious if they don't call you back about that idea.
Offended ,not upset. I just had trouble understanding that not only are you such a moral degenerate that you would intentionally misquote a post to argue against the misquote but such a degenerate as to not understand how discrediting that is of both your argument and you as a person. I have no interest of discussing anything with you ever again. I know who and what you are and how low you are willing to sink. I cant imagine the circumstances where that will ever change.
Yes
I'm sure there is a cost to vaccine hesitancy. I also know you don't need 40 studies or even 30 studies or even 10 studies or even 5 studies to know that people are hesitant due to:
You don't know shit. Studies are needed, because without studies you get stupidity like this.
Good. I forgot one and you provided it (though I might put that in one of the already noted categories, but that's a separate topic). Now we've covered all the bases. Still think 40 studies are needed? 40???
I don't know how this message has failed to get through to you. It's wrong to have an opinion about everything. You should have opinions where you are informed, and no opinions where you are not.
You don't know, but no part of you... the part that has the ability to reason... thinks "Gee, that's sounds really high for something that we, people talking on a forum, have already determine the front end of the research, so all that's really needed is to figure out how to fix it?
Unlike you, I know how science works. I've read studies. Lots of them are needed:
"I can't answer your question about 40. I can tell you that there are ***thousands*** of studies that have tested the predictions of relativity. There are tens of thousands testing quantum theories."
He argues for sport. He's not interested in having a conversation or learning/ exchanging ideas. He gets his kicks off of riling people up by constantly moving the goals posts... then pretending like there's something wrong with you for getting upset. You'll never "win" with him... as "winning" is not his goal. He does not care about any of the topics he argues about. He has no interest in proving a POV or changing minds. He's bored with life and this is his entertainment.
That's really unfair. I certainly don't want the guy to start cursing at me or throwing a tantrum. It's certainly not my goal to make anybody angry although I seem to do it more than most.