superrific
Legend of ZZL
- Messages
- 9,128
There's tons of unknowns in your understanding of pretty much everything.
There aren't many unknowns in quantum or relativity. There used to be. Thousands of studies later, those theories are pretty damn good.
RFK Jr, HHs & Public Health News | Measles outbreak, etc.
- Thread starter nycfan
- Start date
- Replies: 884
- Views: 31K
- Politics
There aren't many unknowns in quantum or relativity. There used to be. Thousands of studies later, those theories are pretty damn good.
superrific
Legend of ZZL
- Messages
- 9,128
You are incorrect. Vaccine Ingredients: Fetal Cells
"In order to grow viruses in the lab, cells need to be made into single cell suspensions, meaning they can no longer be grouped together in the form of tissues or organs. As such, vaccines do not contain “parts of fetuses.”
Vaccines also do not contain fetal cells. Once the vaccine viruses are grown in the cells, the next step in the manufacturing process is to purify the vaccine viruses away from the cells and substances used to help cells grow. If you have ever picked blueberries, you can think of this part of the process as similar. While you are picking, you might get some of the blueberry plant — stems, leaves and even branches — in your berry bucket, but to use the berries, you remove all of those things, so your pie contains only the blueberries (and any other ingredients you choose to add).
Plasmid-gate: Debunking the DNA contamination claims in mRNA vaccines | Global Vaccine Data Network
In recent months, the internet has buzzed with a conspiracy theory dubbed "Plasmid-gate." The claim? COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are "contaminated" with residual DNA, which could integrate into human DNA and potentially cause cancer, or even "turbo cancer." These accusations have sparked concerns...
But here’s where the conspiracy starts: During vaccine production, mRNA is synthesised using plasmids—small, circular pieces of DNA in bacteria like E. coli that carry genetic instructions. Once the desired mRNA is produced, the plasmid DNA is removed through purification processes, though tiny amounts of residual DNA may remain. These fragments are highly degraded and non-functional.
Notice not DNA from fetal cells.
Note also that the entire concept of "fetal DNA" is stupid and makes no sense. DNA is DNA. It's a fucking molecule -- a big one (technically many molecules) -- but a molecule nonetheless. In a pregnant woman there can be traces of the embryo's DNA in her blood stream, but that's not "embryonic" DNA. It's just DNA that came from an embryo -- i.e. the one inside her. Otherwise, DNA is just DNA.
BlooVooDoo
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 1,803
Dude, we can all see the history of your posts. If you’re going to do the Gish Gallop, at least put some fucking effort into it. To this point, and despite prior experience, I’ve given you the benefit of doubt regarding your ability to understand and your sincerity. Thanks for clarifying you’ve neither.
Last edited:
gtyellowjacket
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 2,149
Quote it then. I have consistently said that there are traces of fetal DNA in vaccines. That's what I started saying and that's what I'm still saying.
I'm sure you think you read something else and maybe out of context you did but I would not agree with RFK's statement that there is a lot of fetal material in vaccines.
gtyellowjacket
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 2,149
No. That's pretty silly. The bacterial cells have evolved and mutated pretty significantly in billions of years. The fetal cells today are almost identical if not completely identical to the fetal cells from 60 years ago. Consistency is the one of the main benefits of having a fetal cell line.
BlooVooDoo
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 1,803
BoonetheAiredale
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 85
But you would have to say that fetuses contain bacterial dna debris and ergo said vaccine has bacterial dna debris? Correct? And if so, how do you pick one as more important than the other? There is no line of demarcation as the fetus contains the parents dna debris and the generation before that and the generation before that. DNA debris has accumulated across time to make a trash dump of DNA debris wouldn't you say?
gtyellowjacket
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 2,149
Sure. I'm sure vaccines contain traces of bacterial DNA on an even smaller scale than the traces of fetal DNA that they contain. I suppose both could be true. I think you pick one as being more important or really relevant than the other as the difference between the evolution that would happen in 4,000,000,000 years vs 60 years.
BoonetheAiredale
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 85
Ok let's just go back 3 generations. That a total of 14 sets of DNA debris that made the 15th's debris. Which of those 15 is the most "important" debris, the debris we should focus on? Which one is "really relevant" and why is one more relevant than the other?
So much debris. Kind of like mountain rivers after Hurrican Helene.
gtyellowjacket
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 2,149
I think you're going pretty far off topic here. I think you should tighten up a bit. Do you want to try to ask a relevant question?
BoonetheAiredale
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 85
The topic is dna debris is it not? Is that a relevant question?
This is where this all started and the original discussion was not about DNA debris but aborted DNA debris.
You want to give a source for that claim? I'm not saying you're wrong but I can't imagine the hows or whys.
- Messages
- 23,365
“Steven J. Hatfill, a virologist and White House adviser during President Donald Trump’s first term who pushed hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for the coronavirus despite what most researchers said was a lack of scientific evidence, has joined the second Trump administration in a senior role at the Department of Health and Human Services.
Hatfill will begin his second week Monday as special adviser in the director’s office at the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, a small agency responsible for preparing the U.S. for disasters such as pandemics and biological and chemical attacks.
An Army biodefense researcher, Hatfill was investigated for years by the Justice Department as a “person of interest” in the 2001 mailing of letters that contained anthrax spores, which killed five people and sickened 17. Hatfill was formally exonerated in 2008, the same year the government paid him $4.6 million to settle his lawsuit in the case.
…
Fauci and other health officials said there was no evidence the drug fought the coronavirus. Navarro and Hatfill repeatedly attacked Fauci in the emails, citing his “outrageous bias” and other alleged mistakes in a battle that was picked up by the news media.
On Saturday, Hatfill repeated his claims that hydroxychloroquine is safe and effective against the coronavirus, contending there are “5,000 controlled, randomized studies” that were peer-reviewed. He said that research has shown the drug reduces mortality rates if given early in the course of the disease. …”
FDA Commissioner Marty Makary taps Vinay Prasad to head up CBER
In the wake of the high-profile departure of Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., the FDA has a new leader for its Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). | In the wake of the high-profile departure of Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., the FDA has a new leader for its Center for Biologics Evaluation...
Hope nobody wants an updated COVID vaccine any time soon.
DiehardHeelFan
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 595
Dr. Casey Means, Trump's new surgeon general nominee, is RFK Jr. ally and MAHA advocate
President Trump will nominate Dr. Casey Means, an ally of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and prominent advocate for his agenda, to serve as the U.S. surgeon general, the president announced Wednesday.
Dr. Casey Means, Trump's new surgeon general nominee, is RFK Jr. ally and MAHA advocate
President Trump said his new pick for surgeon general, Dr. Casey Means, has "impeccable" credentials, after the White House withdrew his earlier nominee.
www.cbsnews.com
StrangePackage
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 1,648
Trust the morons is not preferable