Glowing reviews of this article are pouring in from MAGA:
——
There are two possible explanations for Vance’s response: Vance is just not very smart and in rushing to defend Trump’s unqualified envoy, he is unintentionally drawing attention to an article likely to be swallowed by the daily news cycle. Or he’s in on it and wants to draw attention to the article to undermine competition for Trump’s affection while burnishing his own lapdog reputation. Either way, it’s just begging more people to read the original article to see what the fuss is all about.
![]()
The fruits of his negotiations are that we have narrowed the list of open issues in the Russia-Ukraine war to a set of clearly defined issues--specifically, security guarantees and territorial concessions. VANCE
So that is what the VP claims as his defense for what he says was " meant to hurt the administration and one of our most effective members. " You know, failure is failure. He should just let us know when Trump is going to give Ukraine security guarantees. That's in Trump's/Witkoft's ball court.