Russia - US | Ukraine “peace negotiations”

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 35K
  • Politics 
Why is this person allowed to post on this board? Linking utterly absurd lies on this board without (intentionally) any effort to vet them should not be allowed. I'll just do super ignore, but I'd suggest that idiocy of this sort should be moderated out of existence here.
What does everyone else think? Personally, I think Michael Flynn is a disgraceful human being. Pretty much the same with Elon Musk. But, I’m aware others may have a different view.

Do we want an opposing side to have a voice or is this just blatant “trolling”?
 
For the resident pedantic critic to make this leap from what i said to what Obama might have meant is rich indeed.

Lord, you really do have your head buried deeply.

Obama was wrong about Russia. He would say the same himself now I'm sure. Obama certainly never said we would abandon an ally nor did he say we would capitulate to an enemy.
You know that our resident Trumpers and bosiders have lost this argument when they're retroactively blaming Obama for a war that started five years after he left office, or using his words from years ago to try and argue that Democrats were wrong about Russia too - even though it was Democrats under Biden who have been arming and supporting Ukraine since the war started, and it's Trump and the Republicans who appear totally clueless as to what Putin really is about and that he is no way our friend or ally.

Meanwhile in the here and now their party's leader is kissing Putin's ass left and right, driving a deep wedge between us and every one of our allies, uniting Europe against us, and literally doing Putin's bidding by having our draft dodger POTUS petulantly chew out a global hero whose underdog nation has heroically held out for three years against a nation that has done nothing but try to harm and divide us since Putin seized power decades ago. I know that this may shock the Trumpers and bosiders on this board, but perhaps, just perhaps, Trump is so enamored of Putin that he's willingly doing his bidding at the expense of our traditional allies and to the long-term detriment of the country he is leading and whose interests he is supposedly serving.
 
Last edited:
What does everyone else think? Personally, I think Michael Flynn is a disgraceful human being. Pretty much the same with Elon Musk. But, I’m aware others may have a different view.

Do we want an opposing side to have a voice or is this just blatant “trolling”?
Personally I think it's pretty clear that it is clever trolling, in that this poster is smart enough not to cross a line that would get them banned, but they are clearly not arguing in good faith and their goal is just to stir other posters up rather than have a genuine debate or argument. Having said that, I generally prefer to put such posters on ignore or super ignore myself (even though I haven't with this particular poster, at least yet). But I'm aware that others disagree and want these posters banned, and at times it's not hard to see why. My own dividing line is when a poster crosses into deliberate and consistent personal attacks or even stalking posters and sending them ugly PMs and such, which happened on the old IC ZZL and ZZLP in the past. I don't really have a strong opinion about banning them either way, to be honest. If they annoy me too much I'll just put them on ignore. Just my two cents, for whatever it is worth.
 
Why is this person allowed to post on this board? Linking utterly absurd lies on this board without (intentionally) any effort to vet them should not be allowed. I'll just do super ignore, but I'd suggest that idiocy of this sort should be moderated out of existence here.
Relax. When people do what you're doing its a sign they don't like being exposed or the truth they hear is offensive. Its always the left calling for bans, so odd.
 
You know that our resident Trumpers and bosiders have lost this argument when they're retroactively blaming Obama for a war that started five years after he left office, or using his words from years ago to try and argue that Democrats were wrong about Russia too - even though it was Democrats under Biden who have been arming and supporting Ukraine since the war started, and it's Trump and the Republicans who appear totally clueless as to what Putin really is and that he is no way our friend or ally.

Meanwhile in the here and now their party's leader is kissing Putin's ass left and right, driving a deep wedge between us and every one of our allies, uniting Europe against us, and literally doing Putin's bidding by having our draft dodger POTUS petulantly chew out a global hero whose underdog nation has heroically held out for three years against a nation that has done nothing but try to harm and divide us since Putin seized power decades ago. I know that this may shock the Trumpers and bosiders on this board, but perhaps, just perhaps, Trump is so enamored of Putin that he's willingly doing his bidding at the expense of our traditional allies and to the long-term detriment of the country he is leading and whose interests he is supposedly serving.
Russia was invading Ukraine in 2014
 
What does everyone else think? Personally, I think Michael Flynn is a disgraceful human being. Pretty much the same with Elon Musk. But, I’m aware others may have a different view.

Do we want an opposing side to have a voice or is this just blatant “trolling”?
I vote for keeping him. It's good to be reminded what absolute idiocy 40% of Americans are consuming.
 
Again, I'll say it's shocking that our board Trumpers are able to successfully navigate the basics of everyday life.
No really. The problem that most Trumpers face is deficits in higher-order thinking, not being able to do basic tasks that get one through the day.
 
Russia was invading Ukraine in 2014
Not really. It was an incursion, not invasion. Russia didn't send in troops. Russia merely activated and supplied various pro-Russian militias or separatists, as well as sending a cadre of non-uniformed military. But there was no real fighting, and nothing for the Americans or Europeans to do, really.

Also, that incursion occurred basically the moment after the pro-Russian president was deposed and a new government created. That was Feb. 2014. Ukraine was in no position to fight, and they didn't -- because there were no formal enemies and because they didn't have the cohesion to do so.

It was not remotely the same situation, at all.
 
I’m torn between content moderation and super ignore, but in the end super ignore better serves the first amendment spirit. The voice lives but one can choose not to hear it and the ever fainter ripples.
Yes, but it does nothing to help lurkers, nor do anything to induce would-be posters to start posting. And letting misinformation flow unchecked is arguably contributing to the problem.

The bigger problem is that I'm not sure the board can function without the trolls. Engagement with them is a big part of the traffic. It's a big spur of posting energy. Without them, I'm just not sure anyone will participate. Even I have limits on how much I can pontificate.

Think back to the ZZL. This dynamic has been with us for a long time. I think there's a psychological dependence. Liberal posters like to use the trolls as proxies for MAGA, and it gives people an opportunity, so to speak, to yell at the idiocy. I don't know why the trolls are here, but it obviously fills a psychological need for them too. Maybe they need conflict in their life, or have conflict in their life, and they use this board to keep the conflict contained to something that doesn't really matter as opposed to unloading on family or friends.

I have my doubts that a co-dependent relationship that has lasted decades is going to easily be reversed without a more comprehensive plan.
 
What does everyone else think? Personally, I think Michael Flynn is a disgraceful human being. Pretty much the same with Elon Musk. But, I’m aware others may have a different view.

Do we want an opposing side to have a voice or is this just blatant “trolling”?
Important Note: I am not taking a stance on when the mods here should ban someone from the board.

The issue isn't should the "opposing side [...] have a voice", but rather what kinds of posts are acceptable on a board.

Functionally, there is no difference between an intentional troll and someone either too stupid or too brainwashed to consistently put forth a coherent, logical argument based in real world facts (read: non-right-wing media propaganda). Whether the accused "troll" is posting absolute BS intentionally or unintentionally is of no real concern from a pragmatic perspective, as either way the BS is being posted. The operative information isn't what "side" someone is on, it is the manner of posting they utilize in making their points.

In short, a troll who actually believes non-facts and absolute idiocy to be true and shares them with the board is ultimately no different than a troll who knows they are posting non-facts and absolute idiocy.
 
What does everyone else think? Personally, I think Michael Flynn is a disgraceful human being. Pretty much the same with Elon Musk. But, I’m aware others may have a different view.

Do we want an opposing side to have a voice or is this just blatant “trolling”?
I personally don’t think any lines have been crossed that warrant a banning. This board is a bit of a “contained” community where most of the posters are highly intelligent and critical thinkers, so I don’t think posting lies and disinformation here is dangerous. It maybe annoying, but I also think we need to keep an eye on the disinformation that is getting passed along so that we can have a better understanding of that which is being used to attempt to bring us down (and which has apparently been successful at doing just that). You can’t combat the lies and idiocy unless you know what they are.
 
Back
Top