- Messages
- 505
Yep, Trump, your buddy Putin is bombing the hell out of Ukraine. What a guy, eh? I wish there was a hell you and Putin could go to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, the United States wasn't exactly engaging in pin-point bombing strikes against Germany and Japan during WW2. And given that current Russian targeting technology is probably not that advanced over what the US had in WW2, this is what is to be expected. It's not like Russia has Ukranian-level targeting technology or actually cares about what their weapons hit. Didn't you ever wonder why Russian nuclear warheads were always so much larger than their US counterparts?And places with high concentrations of people - apartments, hotels, etc.
What kind of dumbass logic is this?But didn’t Trump cause Europe to take the actions that our moving Russia.
That's one way to look at it, I suppose. It's sort of like praising Caleb Love for missing so many shots that Mondo could get a bunch of offensive rebounds, but OK.But didn’t Trump cause Europe to take the actions that our moving Russia.
Sounds like Z wasn't there for a deal anyways but to cozy up to politicians and continue the money train
Marco sold his soul to the trump cult just like everyone else that hitched their wagon to the man.That makes very good sense.
If only "Little Marco" was offering solutions to aid Ukraine, instead of standing back and standing by like a Proud Boy while the Blusterer In Chief aligns us with Russia and North Korea. Zelensky only 'has no cards' to negotiate with to end the conflict when we weaken rather than strengthen his hand, which seems to be the plan now.
Bigger fucking idiots went to the polls in larger numbers than the intelligent people.How did this fucking idiot get elected again?
I think you are vastly overstating here. The US did not give weapons to Hungary in 1956 or Czechoslovakia in 1968. We were fine fomenting dissent, but we never took the step of sending US weapons to Eastern Bloc countries. The idea that any American president would arm a country on the border of Russia would have been a complete non-starter until this millennium.almost every single other presidential administration in U.S. history, Republican or Democrat- would have chosen- is to give Ukraine the weapons it needs to purge the invading Russians from its land.
Point taken, but I am almost certain Ronald Reagan would have done so and likely either or both Bush’s.I think you are vastly overstating here. The US did not give weapons to Hungary in 1956 or Czechoslovakia in 1968. We were fine fomenting dissent, but we never took the step of sending US weapons to Eastern Bloc countries. The idea that any American president would arm a country on the border of Russia would have been a complete non-starter until this millennium.
Not Eastern Bloc but the Shah of Iran would differ greatly about who got armed and where and so would Turkey. Stick with the Eastern Bloc thing.I think you are vastly overstating here. The US did not give weapons to Hungary in 1956 or Czechoslovakia in 1968. We were fine fomenting dissent, but we never took the step of sending US weapons to Eastern Bloc countries. The idea that any American president would arm a country on the border of Russia would have been a complete non-starter until this millennium.
Not a chance.Point taken, but I am almost certain Ronald Reagan would have done so and likely either or both Bush’s.
Maybe. You're probably more knowledgeable on this subject than I am, but I'm not sure that Reagan or either Bush would consider Putin's nuclear war bluster is anything other than just that. From what I think understand about each of those three, they were more of hardliners on Russia than was Joe Biden, and Biden did not hesitate to arm Ukraine.Not a chance.
Now, if you mean a reincarnated Ronald Reagan inhabiting the White House today, then maybe.
But there is a long, long history of the US treating Russia/USSR far different than any other country. To arm Ukraine as heavily as we have to date, in the face of the threats of nuclear war from Putin, is a significant departure from historical US policy.
I mean, we are fine arming the mujahedeen in Afghanistan with small arms weapons and giving them CIA training, but that is whole world apart from sending tanks and HIMARS to a country within a short plane trip of Moscow.
He hesitated. Ukraine never got the weapons it needed because Biden was scared of escalation.Maybe. You're probably more knowledgeable on this subject than I am, but I'm not sure that Reagan or either Bush would consider Putin's nuclear war bluster is anything other than just that. From what I think understand about each of those three, they were more of hardliners on Russia than was Joe Biden, and Biden did not hesitate to arm Ukraine.
In all fairness so did all of Europe It was an All Nato decisionHe hesitated. Ukraine never got the weapons it needed because Biden was scared of escalation.
You mean back in the days of yore when US/Europe policy was in sync?In all fairness so did all of Europe It was an All Nato decision
Those days were coolYou mean back in the days of yore when US/Europe policy was in sync?