- Messages
- 1,485
Nope. Too many layers.Would this be a good show to start watching if you're mentally drained all the time and kind of watch as though you're staring at a wall?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. Too many layers.Would this be a good show to start watching if you're mentally drained all the time and kind of watch as though you're staring at a wall?
I think so. The scene with Burt and Irving at the phone booth - was that asynchronous with the rest of the episode? I was falling asleep while watching, so maybe I missed something, but I thought it was possibly a much earlier scene and leads to an explanation for Irving’s shift, via his connection with Burt.But Irving was definitely reintegrated right?
Allow me to propose a more extended and bizarre hypothesis:It's just weird if that's the case because the code wouldn't be needed
Yeah, that strikes as plausible given there’s a baby Kier crawling at the foot of Mark’s bed, in the opening.Allow me to propose a more extended and bizarre hypothesis:
The code they're working on is somehow connected to reconstructing Kier's brain/mind which will be inserted into Mark and Helena's baby allowing Kier to be born again.
No because Irving said he was let go right? That they knew what his innie was up toI think so. The scene with Burt and Irving at the phone booth - was that asynchronous with the rest of the episode? I was falling asleep while watching, so maybe I missed something, but I thought it was possibly a much earlier scene and leads to an explanation for Irving’s shift, via his connection with Burt.
EwwwAllow me to propose a more extended and bizarre hypothesis:
The code they're working on is somehow connected to reconstructing Kier's brain/mind which will be inserted into Mark and Helena's baby allowing Kier to be born again.
It's comparable to Lost, if you watched that, for complexity and wtf did I just see momentsWould this be a good show to start watching if you're mentally drained all the time and kind of watch as though you're staring at a wall?
Correct. Not a flashback.No because Irving said he was let go right? That they knew what his innie was up to
Yes maybe —Would this be a good show to start watching if you're mentally drained all the time and kind of watch as though you're staring at a wall?
Seemed to be fighting back tears from her facial expression.Also was Natalie tearing up in the painting discussion or was it the lighting?
FWIW, I said "nope" from a very bias POV. This show is full of easter eggs, and I very much enjoy tracking those, making predictions, as well as rewatching earlier references and visuals that portended later developments. This show has a dozen easter eggs in every episode, and I would feel like I was missing something if I was in a bleary state.Seems like a good enough show that I should save it for when I'm better (plz god now) and I'll rewatch some dumb show or show I've seen a hundred times like Breaking Bad ha.
And who doesn't love a surly Gary OldmanIf you haven't ventured in yet, you might appreciate Slow Horses. It starts a bit rocky, but coalesces within 3 episodes. It has a formulaic rhythm but with above average acting and dialogue.
Full of Easter eggs is a understatement. There are intentionally placed, subtle details and clues everywhere.FWIW, I said "nope" from a very bias POV. This show is full of easter eggs, and I very much enjoy tracking those, making predictions, as well as rewatching earlier references and visuals that portended later developments. This show has a dozen easter eggs in every episode, and I would feel like I was missing something if I was in a bleary state.
If you haven't ventured in yet, you might appreciate Slow Horses. It starts a bit rocky, but coalesces within 3 episodes. It has a formulaic rhythm but with above average acting and dialogue.
I’ve thought this a possibility, though it’s always seemed a bit too on the nose, vs some kind of larger commentary on AI, consciousness, corporate subjugation, code switching, dissociation as a survival mechanism, amongst others. If the end result is a revived Kier, in a standard biological manner, I imagine a high probability I’ll feel disappointed, as this show has delved into themes and symbolism that feel too meta and critical than mere revival. That said, there’s certainly a home run version of that outcome, too, particularly in the age of Thiel, Musk, Andressen, Brian Johnson, Zuckerberg, Sacks, etc.From Screen Rant:
"Mark's final interaction with Reghabi in Severance season 2's episode 5 suggests that Lumon stole Gemma's dead body from the Morgue and found a way to revive her. The company might have done something similar to Ms. Huang after she died. If this is true, both Huang and Casey could be test subjects for Lumon's revival technology experiments."
If that's true, they could be all trying to revive Kier