Tariffs Catch-All

  • Thread starter Thread starter BubbaOtis
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 63K
  • Politics 
No wonder I'm confused. I always thought that go along and get along thing was kinda useful in making deals.

Curious minds wonder if there isn't a clear distinction between eight rounds and eight tries.
 
ZenMode said:
I don't trust the go-along-to-get-along beurocrats to do what's best for the country, even after 8 tries.
Click to expand...
I don't trust you to have any fucking clue what is best for the country. You are saying that you know better than thousands of smart, highly educated people -- people way smarter and more educated than you -- who have infinitely more experience given that you have none.

Nobody does extreme arrogance better than you. In fact, you're the most arrogant person on this board hands down.
 
superrific said:
I don't trust you to have any fucking clue what is best for the country.
Click to expand...
Duh ... clearly it's only YOU that has a clue on EVERYTHING!
superrific said:
You are saying that you know better than thousands of smart, highly educated people -- people way smarter and more educated than you -- who have infinitely more experience given that you have none.
Click to expand...
christmas vacation GIF
superrific said:
Nobody does extreme arrogance better than you. In fact, you're the most arrogant person on this board hands down.
Click to expand...
christmas vacation GIF
 
ZenMode said:
Duh ... clearly it's only YOU that has a clue on EVERYTHING!
Click to expand...
Not only me, duh. But at least I know things. You don't. The gap between your knowledge of what we talk about here, and my knowledge, is approximately the same as the girls' basketball team at Chapel Hill High and the UNC men's varsity. But everyone already knows that, which is why my opinion is valued and yours scorned.

And I keep telling you: your opinion wouldn't be scorned if you tried to learn. If you learned things, you'd be surprised how much more respect you would have. You can close the gap between us. I can't, but you can.
 
ZenMode said:
The strategy, in general, should be to come to agreements with each country so we aren't getting hit with large tariffs while charging low tariffs.

China is a separate issue...
Click to expand...
That is not the problem. The real problem is government subsidized industries, like Chinese steel, which can then be sold at a lower cost in the US due to that subsidization.

The second issue is non-tariff barriers, like requiring US companies to partner with local companies if they wish to sell into a market or requiring IP transfers.

Us getting charged higher tariffs is not a thing.
 
Calheel said:
That is not the problem. The real problem is government subsidized industries, like Chinese steel, which can then be sold at a lower cost in the US due to that subsidization.
Click to expand...
Also known as a subsidy. LOL. I always find it funny when people take a noun that came from a verb, and then "verbify" it by adding a suffix and that's how we get utilization instead of use. We all do it.

Anyway, one problem here is that it's quite difficult to measure the subsidy. We assume it should be there because we assume that the Chinese companies' price structure is the same as ours. I don't know if that's a good assumption to make.

The non-tariff barrier business is likely going away on its own, as I mentioned above. China isn't afraid of US tech any more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top