WaynetheDrain
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 1,062
I wonder if this trade deal with China will require another bailout for farmers like the last one did.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks bud! Coming up for air a bit, work is really busy for me from January through April. Plus 2 young kids at home now instead of just 1.Hope you have been doing well HeelYeah, haven't seen you around much lately.
Congratulations on your second child.Thanks bud! Coming up for air a bit, work is really busy for me from January through April. Plus 2 young kids at home now instead of just 1.
I tend to mostly tune out from politics inbetween campaign seasons but won’t be long until 2026 midterms start to become a focus.
So is it a real trade deal, or have the two sides just agreed to "start a formal negotiation process"? Still pretty vague on the details. The Chinese statement doesn't sound so much like an actual deal as simply an agreement to engage in "recurring discussions" on trade disputes. It will be interesting tomorrow to see the actual details and how Trumpers spin them.Bessent Hails ‘Productive’ U.S.-China Trade Talks
Treasury secretary cites progress and promises more details Monday; Beijing says the two sides agreed to start a formal negotiation process
—> https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy...37?st=WvoPtd&reflink=mobilewebshare_permalink
“… During the same briefing Sunday in Switzerland, Greer suggested that some sort of agreement had been reached with the Chinese side without providing specifics.
“It’s important to understand how quickly we were able to come to agreement, which reflects that perhaps the differences were not so large as maybe thought,” Greer said. He noted the U.S.’s massive trade deficit was why President Trump declared a national emergency and imposed tariffs on China and other countries.
“We’re confident that the deal we struck with our Chinese partners will help us to work toward resolving that national emergency,” Greer said.
The White House issued a statement after the duo’s briefing, which was titled “U.S. Announces China Trade Deal in Geneva.” The statement included Greer and Bessent’s remarks from Switzerland, but nothing else.
The state-run Xinhua New Agency said both sides agreed to establish an “economic and trade consultation mechanism” that would involve recurring discussions. The agency said the U.S. and China would release on Monday a joint statement—a rare occurrence in recent years as bilateral relations have been strained. …”
How the Trumplicans will spin this?So is it a real trade deal, or have the two sides just agreed to "start a formal negotiation process"? Still pretty vague on the details. The Chinese statement doesn't sound so much like an actual deal as simply an agreement to engage in "recurring discussions" on trade disputes. It will be interesting tomorrow to see the actual details and how Trumpers spin them.
Buddy, I’ve been around these boards for years and years. With both parties in charge. But I have never been one to focus too much on politics between election seasons. And with this board being its own entity instead of commingled with IC, I end up here a little less because the sports boards is what usually drew me to IC on a daily basis and I would mosey over to the politics board while I was there.Sure, sure. I have a hunch that if the 2026 midterms don't turn out well for board Trumpers then it will be even longer before they decide to return.
It’s a concept of a deal addressing the rules for negotiating a concept of a trade deal.So is it a real trade deal, or have the two sides just agreed to "start a formal negotiation process"? Still pretty vague on the details. The Chinese statement doesn't sound so much like an actual deal as simply an agreement to engage in "recurring discussions" on trade disputes. It will be interesting tomorrow to see the actual details and how Trumpers spin them.