You struggle with circularity. Let me try to explain this ever more simply.
1. I said nothing about players getting paid.
2. You inferred that I have an issue with players getting paid because I complained about the inconstancy of college sports. One of those aspects was the way rosters can turn over 100% in any given year -- something that is not possible in any other sports league I've ever watched.
3. I said it has nothing to do with players getting paid. If they were paid $1 or $1K or $1M, I still wouldn't like the fact that nothing is constant. If a person's views on B isn't modified by whether A is true or not true, then you can't say that A is a cause of B. You just can't.
4. You recognize that my position doesn't depend on players getting paid.
5. Now we're back to #1 and you think you've made some sort of point?
All along, you drew an inference that was not there. Period. Full stop. You've admitted that the reasoning behind the inference is false. Yet you continue with the accusation. On what basis? None.
Why do you do this? You're just randman at this point.
No need to try to simplify any further, it was already broken down as far as it (basically) can be. You complained about players moving around. It's clear to (almost) everyone the reason they move around. You then tried to through in a condition to give yourself room to wiggle out of what you said. It's clear to (almost) everyone that your further condition has no bearing on your personal beliefs - you still won't like it if players move around, and they would continue to do so if they were able to get a more fair share of the revenue they generate. This is obvious to (almost) everyone. It's clear to (almost) everyone that you have an issue with players trying to gain compensation from their work.
What is now clear to me is that you're right, you are not trolling. You simply can't see what your comments at the time implied, and now that you do, you can't just admit that you misspoke/mistyped and move on. You double-down, triple-down, trying to bring in arguments from logic, in attempts to gain freedom from your original comments. (As an aside, you could use more time studying the principles of logic and logical arguments.) But, unlike our current collegiate-athletics model (thankfully), you can't. You're stuck with your beliefs.
At the end of the day, you're entitled to not like college sports because it resembles the minor leagues to you, with all of the players moving around for better contracts. I don't understand why you just can't accept that, and own it. But that's you, I guess. And for me, it's clear that you've had a struck nerve, so, before taking it to the point that you go and punch a wall, again, I'll chill and let you do your thing. Before I leave, I do want to acknowledge the clear amount of time you've put into your studies of writing, as you are a good writer, and to point out a few words that might have slipped through your endless hours of study: humble, self-aware, self-reflective, and honest - you never know, you might open up a whole new world once you understand their meanings. Enjoy your evening super.