Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The cross dresser part is unsubstantiated, but not the gay part. His lifelong "close friend" Clyde Tolson sure as hell acted like a life partner. They would go on vacation together. Hoover bequeathed his estate to Tolson. Tolson accepted the flag that draped Hoover's coffin. Tolson is buried a few yards away from Hoover.I’ve read that the allegations that Hoover was a gay cross dresser have not been substantiated and are considered unproven — they apparently rely in large part on an unreliable witness (though I don’t recall the details now) who was the source of virtually all the rumors that followed.
Could you expand on this a bit. I'm not sure I catch your meaning.lol i know that people here haven't talked to gay/trans people because every single one i know has experience with conservative/republican chasers.
Ah, the last resort of scoundrels: the distortion of truth into all-or-nothing.So, in summary.....
Democrats have no part in the current political divide and have not contributed to the political violence because Trump has done all of it and democrats are only accurately describing Trump. No reckless hyperbole at all.
Have you read Project 2025?
“… The organized doxxing campaigns. The organized riots. The organized street violence. The organized of dehumanization. Vilification. Posting people’s addresses. Combining that with messaging designed to trigger and incite violence and the actual organized cells that carry out and facilitate the violence. It is a vast domestic terror movement. With God and as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle and destroy these networks, and make America safe again for the American people. It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name. …”
[Vance nods along]
That's because the NFL's popularity is mostly MAGA.I can’t think of many occasions where the NFL held moments of silence for people who either were not affiliated with the NFL or were not members of the community where the moment of silence took place. And it’s especially difficult to wrap my head around someone whose claim to fame was essentially saying so many cruel, divisive, hateful, and inflammatory things getting a moment of silence at such an event.
“… The organized doxxing campaigns. The organized riots. The organized street violence. The organized of dehumanization. Vilification. Posting people’s addresses. Combining that with messaging designed to trigger and incite violence and the actual organized cells that carry out and facilitate the violence. It is a vast domestic terror movement. With God and as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle and destroy these networks, and make America safe again for the American people. It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name. …”
[Vance nods along]
Yep all the signs point to Groyper.Anything is possible, but given the dynamics here, one option seems much more likely.
I haven't been able to get a single Dem poster to acknowledge meaningful involvement of their party in this current situation.Ah, the last resort of scoundrels: the distortion of truth into all-or-nothing.
I can if they apply.Nobody here is saying that Democrats "have no part." You can't make those sorts of categorical statements.
Right. Dems have no meaningful involvement. Dems are just "calling it like it is and, I mean, they're right, so what's wrong with saying what is true?"I think we are saying the vast, vast majority of the stochastic terrorism and celebration of political violence comes from Trump and MAGA.
It might help your case if you could produce examples of Dems having meaningful involvement. You're one of those morons who thinks Obama was "divisive" when in reality he bent over backwards to be bipartisan. Obama's 2004 DNC speech was considered to be an implicit rebuke of John Edwards' "two Americas" campaign stylings -- which itself was mostly a chronicle of the relative privilege of the rich over the poor.I haven't been able to get a single Dem poster to acknowledge meaningful involvement of their party in this current situation.
I can if they apply.
Right. Dems have no meaningful involvement. Dems are just "calling it like it is and, I mean, they're right, so what's wrong with saying what is true?"
Standard stuff for which I have no cure.
ask Zen or RamIt seems like MAGA has totally forgotten Minnesota House of Representatives Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman and her husband, killed by a right-wing lunatic. Where is their 'moment of silence'? And, unlike Kirk, Ms. Hortman wasn't spreading hate and lies.
"chaser" is slang in the trans community for people who seek out trans people for sexual partners because of a fetish they have about transness. and pretty often, they're folks who will publicly denigrate trans people or "ideology."Could you expand on this a bit. I'm not sure I catch your meaning.
Got it. Yes, I agree."chaser" is slang in the trans community for people who seek out trans people for sexual partners because of a fetish they have about transness. and pretty often, they're folks who will publicly denigrate trans people or "ideology."
kind of a more contemporary analog of the stories you'll hear from older gay men about their relationships and escapades with men in hetero marriages.
yeah, i realize now it was unclear but i was adding to your point, not respondingGot it. Yes, I agree.
No problem at all. We're good. Plus, your post is only confusing for those who don't know what "chasers" mean. That's at least partly my responsibility -- but now I know, which is one reason to participate in a message board like this.yeah, i realize now it was unclear but i was adding to your point, not responding