- Messages
- 483
Speaking of Sanders, I hope it's not controversial to say that I find Paul very difficult to understand.
I was actually going to write a paper (that I believed was true) that when the manuscripts of Paul were collected by whomever in the 90's CE, they were more or less lying in people's drawers in places like Corinth and Ephesus, and that when they were copied a number of pages were copied back-to-front...ie, there are hard, inexplicable transitions in the text as we now have it that are likely the result of MSS just being stored and copied in a haphazard manner (there were no page numbers - nor even spaces between words - back then). I think the case can be convincingly made in 1 Corinthians.
That doesn't make Paul "understandable" though. He's still talking out of both sides of his mouth. On the one hand, he wants to set himself above and apart from Torah-affirming Christians - and he genuinely believes ritual Judaism is a problem - but on the other hand, he doesn't want to piss off the Jewish Christians in the congregations he's writing to, especially the Romans. "Am I calling the Torah a bunch of bullshit flung in anger by a malevolent deity? By no means!!!" [Yea, Paul, you sorta just did that]
Plus, he was just a phenomenally arrogant person with a mean and violent streak that didn't just magically disappear when he had his vision of the risen Christ. My favorite commentator, Stephen Mitchell, observed that Paul's vision was like getting a little spot of his window clean...he was so proud of that and overwhelmed by it he ignored the fact that the rest of his window was caked with grime.