Trump Admin takes over D.C. Policing

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 49K
  • Politics 
Why not just say it out loud? You know you want to. It’s not like it would change anyone’s opinion of you around here.
You are right. DIMOCRATS ARE CLUELESS ON HOW TO COMBAT CRIME AND EPIC FAILURES IN 10 OUT OF 10 OF THE NATION'S MOST VIOLENT CITIES. Not to worry though. Your Daddy Trump to the rescue to save our nations capital.
 
Hmm, sure it was. Your hypothesis is that cities have violent crime because of Democratic mayors, but don't you think more power, namely in the form of cash to get things done, resides with the state government? Do they get a pass?
So your argument is that the cities don't have enough resources? Maybe they do and don't allocate those resources in a manner that best addresses high crime rates. This isn't a new problem. High crime rates in major cities controlled by your party is a decades long problem. Congress cut funding for dc in 2025. Crime in dc has been a 50 year problem.
 
So your argument is that the cities don't have enough resources? Maybe they do and don't allocate those resources in a manner that best addresses high crime rates. This isn't a new problem. High crime rates in major cities controlled by your party is a decades long problem. Congress cut funding for dc in 2025. Crime in dc has been a 50 year problem.
So high crime rates prove that a jurisdiction is poorly run?
 
You are right. DIMOCRATS ARE CLUELESS ON HOW TO COMBAT CRIME AND EPIC FAILURES IN 10 OUT OF 10 OF THE NATION'S MOST VIOLENT CITIES. Not to worry though. Your Daddy Trump to the rescue to save our nations capital.
The vast majority of American cities are run by democrats, you dipshit.



1755137301305.png


 
The vast majority of American cities are run by democrats, you dipshit.



1755137301305.png


So what you are saying is that the more liberal the city becomes the more violent the city becomes. Cool chart.
 
You and hardly anyone else who can read have your heads stuck up your asses and are either to blind (at best) or willfully ignorant to admit the problem in dc. You don't like it that trump is going to fix a problem in dc that dim mayors all over the country have and then get the credit for it. So your automatic reflex is to pretend the problem is nonexistent. Go see a shrink.


God, you're dense. I never said there was "no crime" in DC, that's your usual Trumper exaggeration talking. What I did say - and you have yet to refute - is that nearly every statistic shows that crime is actually dropping in DC. Why didn't Trump send in the troops in his first term, when violent crime was worse? All the articles you posted show is that there have been some murders in DC, which happens in every freaking city - including a great many small ones (there were two murders in my little suburb and several shootings in just the last couple of months). The Atlantic article saying that DC has a crime problem doesn't preclude the fact that violent crime is declining in the city. Again, if Trump cares so much about this problem, why didn't he send in troops in his first term? Your argument remains absurd - you have a city where even if crime is high it is still provably in decline, and yet that's when your fearless leader is choosing to send in the troops. I thought Republicans wanted to save money and cut costs. Not this time, apparently.
 
Last edited:
Between 1991 and 2016, the crime rates in America’s 30 largest cities (as of 2016) decreased by 63.9%. Do you think those cities got more liberal or conservative during that time?
Careful, using credible data to show that violent crime is actually decreasing in large cities doesn't mean that crime isn't still out of control because <checks notes> all Trumpers just "know" that big cities are crime-ridden hellholes filled with poors, beggars, homeless bums, and minorities, and that nobody wants to live in or move to these places, even though somehow it's urban areas that have been experiencing nearly all of our nation's population growth for decades.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top