- Messages
- 7,094
That's wrong too, but tit for tat isn't a viable approach.Targeting? Like using the IRS to go after conservative groups?
Do you support releasing convicted felons then complaining about crime?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's wrong too, but tit for tat isn't a viable approach.Targeting? Like using the IRS to go after conservative groups?
You simply can't grasp how illogical your point is or either you can't articulate it well enough to make sense. It lacks any common sense. You want me to give you an answer to a question that only 5 people on the face of the earth could answer and them claim that the lack of an answer is somehow validates your point. The sheer illogical nature of your argument is rhetorical. Your question wasn't legitimate because the answer to it is unknown, but primarily because it is irrelevant to addressing the issue today.Oh, I dunno, maybe those pesky stats showing that violent crime is steadily dropping in DC (just confirmed by the White House on your favorite network, Fox News) and to which your response has basically been that you don't care because <something, something> it's still too high in your opinion and Dear Leader's opinion, because as we all know big cities are crime-infested hellholes that can only be saved by sending in the troops. And your only response to a perfectly legitimate question about why, if crime in DC is so bad that Trump needed to act, he didn't do this in his first term has been to basically say that you don't give a damn and maybe I need to write him a letter, which isn't actually debating anything either - it's just ignoring points that are made and using right-wing cliches and stereotypes in response ("Russia, Russia, Russia", seriously?).
Although I did see that Trump's reinforcements in DC did arrest a guy for throwing a Subway sandwich at cops and charge him with a felony, so I'm sure that conservatives are really getting to the bottom of things in DC. Carry on, dude, I'm done with arguing with a guy whose main response to anything I post is to say that you don't give a damn and yell that Trump is "rubbing my ass raw" and "kicking my ass" and so on. What is it with your obsession with that part of the anatomy?
It's kind of droll that Trump pardoned the participants of the biggest crime spree in DC history only to now send in the troops during a declining crime rate.That's wrong too, but tit for tat isn't a viable approach.
Do you support releasing convicted felons then complaining about crime?
What about the sandwich itself? I'm reliably told a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich.My guess that they'll have to plead the sandwich preppie down to a misdemeanor - they'll never bring the felony charge to a DC jury.
I've said before that there is more than a decent chance that 2024 was last national election in this country.Serious question - is anyone confident in elections moving forward?
Can someone smarter than me (likely everyone here) explain why there won’t be military deployment across the country, and why even if there was, elections would still proceed as normal.
Well there is no context there so no answer to that. I'm assuming you are talking about jan 6. As a rule I'm not much on the power of the pardon and how presidents use it. If i were potus I don't think I would be using the pardon power very liberally.That's wrong too, but tit for tat isn't a viable approach.
Do you support releasing convicted felons then complaining about crime?
WhateverWould be a good point if that had happened.
She was a DEI hire…She is not qualified for that job…She knows what it means, dumbass. I get it -- you don't think highly of black people.
But I could very well have said those exact words. "What do you mean, chain of command" is a way of saying, "there is no chain of command, are you fucking kidding me". It's a more polite way of saying that. If I didn't say exactly what she said, I might have responded more like, "what are you talking about, a chain of command in this pigshit seat-of-the-pants, racist administration where one is more evil than the next? They don't know how to tie their goddamn shoes, let alone run a police department."
So I think you should apologize for that load of racist drivel.
or in say campaigning for office on the promise to target a private citizenWould be a good point if that had happened.
Lol. Who controlled the IRS in 2017? You’re such a mark.
Why do you keep punching yourself in the balls with things like this?or in say campaigning for office on the promise to target a private citizen
Lol. Who controlled the IRS in 2017? You’re such a mark.
Why does that matter? The actions driving the lawsuits occurred before that. Of course you know that. Your life seems driven by semantics. I find that to generally be a weakness and less than intellectually honest. Are all lawyers that way? You know many more of them than i do.Lol. Who controlled the IRS in 2017? You’re such a mark.
Right. Here's the conversation in the Oval Office in November 2017.Why does that matter? The actions driving the lawsuits occurred before that. Of course you know that. Your life seems driven by semantics. I find that to generally be a weakness and less than intellectually honest. Are all lawyers that way? You know many more of them than i do.