Trump Criminal & Civil Cases | GA Supremes DQ Willis

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 623
  • Views: 26K
  • Politics 
Callatoroy said:
Thank you. I should offer you congrats as well. Being an officer of the court and supporting political lawfare. Way to stand up for blind justice. You did your profession proud.
Click to expand...
You are either blind, and idiot, or just don’t give a damn if you don't think Trump is a crook. I guess trying to have that fascist country for straight white Christian nationalists is more important to you.
 
nycfan said:
Click to expand...

What part of "the appeals court retains jurisdiction" does she not understand? Until such time as the appeals court rules on the dismissal of Nauta's case, Cannon has no authority whatsoever to do anything in this case.

Come on, Merrick. You've got about one week left in your career. Do the right thing and publicly tell Cannon to her face to fuck off.
 
superrific said:
What part of "the appeals court retains jurisdiction" does she not understand? Until such time as the appeals court rules on the dismissal of Nauta's case, Cannon has no authority whatsoever to do anything in this case.

Come on, Merrick. You've got about one week left in your career. Do the right thing and publicly tell Cannon to her face to fuck off.
Click to expand...
I wish
 


As a non-litigator, I am mildly surprised that DOJ even responded to Cannon at this point, but can also see that the policy is always respond and then object or appeal.
 
nycfan said:


As a non-litigator, I am mildly surprised that DOJ even responded to Cannon at this point, but can also see that the policy is always respond and then object or appeal.
Click to expand...

Especially when the answer is that her paranoid conspiracy thinking has no basis in fact.
 
nycfan said:
Click to expand...

I think she's almost certain to drag out her decision on Volume 2 until after 1/20, but she's at least acknowledging the absurdity of the motion to enjoin the release of Volume 1. If Cannon thinks the motion is baseless, rest assured it's bat shit crazy. And yet Trump continues to whine about it.
 
lawtig02 said:
I think she's almost certain to drag out her decision on Volume 2 until after 1/20, but she's at least acknowledging the absurdity of the motion to enjoin the release of Volume 1. If Cannon thinks the motion is baseless, rest assured it's bat shit crazy. And yet Trump continues to whine about it.
Click to expand...
She still doesn't have jurisdiction over any of this. They should release the report as they like. What is Cannon going to do? Hold Merrick Garland in contempt? She has no jurisdiction over him.
 
superrific said:
She still doesn't have jurisdiction over any of this. They should release the report as they like. What is Cannon going to do? Hold Merrick Garland in contempt? She has no jurisdiction over him.
Click to expand...
Agreed. I'm just predicting what Cannon will do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top