Yeah, that's not a legal argument. That's just a word salad wrapping the core idea, which is "must help Dear Leader."
Note that "the first of its kind" actually cuts against your side. If this was the first of its kind, and you say that makes it different, then there was no concrete standard for Fani to follow. You idiots keep trumpeting this stupid line, "this type of prosecution has never happened before" as if it helps your side. The reason, of course, that there have not been these types of cases before is that our presidents have not been criminals. With the exception of Nixon.
See if you can answer this question: was it illegal for Trump to ask Raffensberger to find him votes, and if so, would it justify prosecution? Please show your work.