superrific
Legend of ZZL
- Messages
- 8,778
Yeah, it's his bizarre and inappropriate use of language that makes me question if he has legal training. I don't know, maybe they do law differently in Georgia. But most everywhere else, courts don't have rights. The concept doesn't even make sense.That is neither the court’s mission or right.
A brief explainer: a right is a principle or claim that justifies a favorable outcome in an adversarial setting. Initially, when one claims a right, it's not usually in court, but it's still adversarial. For instance, you might tell snoopy police officers that you have a Fourth Amendment right not to open your house to a search unless the officer has a warrant. Their efforts to gain access are adversarial to your effort to keep them out. But ultimately it comes down to claims that can be adjudicated in court. When you tell the police officer you have a right to refuse him entry, what you are saying is that, should the police officer force his way in without a warrant, you can obtain redress in court.
Thus, it's readily apparent that courts don't have rights. Rather, they have authority -- specifically, the authority to adjudicate claims of rights. Sometimes the right can asserted on both sides; for instance, in a contract dispute, one side might say it has the right to build, and the other side says it has the right to block building until it's paid. Or the right can be an assertion by a private individual against the government, which is generally how we tend to use the word in casual discourse. There is no way to conceptualize the court as having a right. It's there, in the words of Article III, to decide cases or controversies. Rights are what it decides.
Similarly, legislatures do not have rights except in very special situations involving interbranch disputes (and even there, it's not really a "right" but that word is sometimes used). Legislatures have powers. You would not say, "the legislature has a right to regulate medical practice." You would say that it has the power to do so, and if that power is challenged, we end up with a case, decided by a court, of an individual asserting a right and the government asserts a power.
To talk about courts having rights is a basic category mistake. Again, maybe they do things differently in Georgia, but I've never seen any respectable person of legal training talk about courts that way.