Trump / Musk (other than DOGE) Omnibus Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 11K
  • Views: 316K
  • Politics 
I suspect we're going to see the first 3 differently.

"Documented alcoholism" I assume is based on accusations of former Fox employee, many more employees have disputed the claim.

"Sexual assault" is an accusation for which there was no legal action ever taken.

"Misogyny" is probably a reference to his views on women in the military. It's a stretch to say that not lowering established physical requirements is "misogyny"

I'm not sure what the Christian Nationalism is a reference to.
Read this and ask yourself why you EVER interact with this poster.
 
Shit, just put anyone in charge.

I mean, that’s kinda the GOP mantra at this point.
The GOP mantra is for government to FAIL.

Put incompetent people in charge of Executive Branch, fire the career experts…….when the shit hits the
 
Shit, just put anyone in charge.

I mean, that’s kinda the GOP mantra at this point.
The GOP mantra is for government to FAIL.

Put incompetent people in charge of Executive Branch, fire the career experts…….when the shit hits the fan, blame the failure on “THE GOVERNMENT.”

SUCCESS!
 
“There are safety nets to keep a clearly unqualified person in charge from fucking everything up,” is not a good reason to put that person in charge.

Ask yourself this: of the people close enough to the president, and all of the unqualified people below him, who are going to be the adults in the room who keeps them from, well, “fucking everything up?”

Because I honestly couldn’t tell you.
Musk, Thiel, Bezos, Zuckerberg, and the rest of the Tech Bros WANT the US Government to fail.
 
Shit, just put anyone in charge.

I mean, that’s kinda the GOP mantra at this point.
I've heard that Don Jr and Eric like to shoot guns. Doesn't get more qualified or patriotic than that for a top brass job in the military.
 
The GOP mantra is for government to FAIL.

Put incompetent people in charge of Executive Branch, fire the career experts…….when the shit hits the fan, blame the failure on “THE GOVERNMENT.”

SUCCESS!
No, no, no. You misunderstand them. They are simply installing "Agents of change." To, you know... break...errr...change stuff...forever.
 

Trump team sets red line on Hegseth's FBI background check​



“…
  • A member of the Trump transition sat in on the FBI background briefing on Hegseth's file, a source familiar told Axios. The senators weren't given a copy of the file. They also weren't allowed to take notes or pictures.

Wicker privately raised the idea of letting his full committee see Hegseth's file, but Trump officials are opposed to sharing it, according to a person familiar with the matter.

  • The Trump team wants to hold the line on having a consistent standard for all nominees.
  • Look for them to fight any effort to release Hegseth's file, even if Wicker says there's not much of interest. …”
Hegseth can answer basic questions that the person in this position should be able to. He shouldn't be confirmed.
 
I suspect we're going to see the first 3 differently.

"Documented alcoholism" I assume is based on accusations of former Fox employee, many more employees have disputed the claim.

"Sexual assault" is an accusation for which there was no legal action ever taken.

"Misogyny" is probably a reference to his views on women in the military. It's a stretch to say that not lowering established physical requirements is "misogyny"

I'm not sure what the Christian Nationalism is a reference to.
This might be your worst post ever.
 

Tulsi Gabbard’s Charm Offensive Draws Skepticism From Republican Senators​

In private meetings, Trump’s choice to become spy chief has mixed up details about a key surveillance law​



“… Those concerns have largely remained private, and GOP lawmakers are expected to publicly support her despite their misgivings. But further missteps could jeopardize her nomination as Trump prepares to take office.


In her meeting with Sen. James Lankford (R., Okla.), Gabbard couldn’t clearly articulate what the role of director of national intelligence entails, two Senate Republican aides and a Trump transition official said. When she met with Sen. Mike Rounds (R., S.D.), Gabbard seemed confused about a key U.S. national-security surveillance power, a top legislative priority for nearly every member on the Senate Intelligence Committee, conflating it with other issues, the aides said.

Senators are under pressure from Trump and his allies to vote in favor of his nominees.

After a Tuesday confirmation hearing for Pete Hegseth, Trump’s pick to run the Pentagon, Elon Musk, the billionaire adviser to the president-elect, signaled his support for launching primary challenges against Republican senators who oppose the nomination. …”

 



SEC sues Elon Musk for allegedly failing to properly disclose his Twitter ownership stake​


“… The US Securities and Exchange Commission sued Elon Musk on Tuesday for allegedly failing to properly disclose his ownership of X, then known as Twitter, as required by federal law, which allowed him to buy shares of the platform at “artificially low prices.”

Before he closed his $44 billion deal to buy Twitter in October 2022, Musk began to acquire a “significant number” of Twitter shares. By mid-March 2022, he owned more than 5% of the company’s common stock and was required to disclose that to the SEC within 10 calendar days. The filing alleged that Musk failed to disclose that information until April 4, 2022.


In keeping these purchases at low prices, Musk “underpaid Twitter investors by more than $150 million for his purchases of Twitter common stock during this period,” according to the complaint, which was filed in DC federal court.

By the close of March 24, 2022, Musk had increased his stake in the company to more than 7%, according to the lawsuit. The next day, he purchased almost 3.5 million shares. Over the next few days, he also expressed interest in acquiring Twitter to members of the company’s board of directors.

… Musk joined Twitter’s board and formally disclosed his stake in the company in early April 2022, according to the lawsuit. By the time he disclosed his stake, he owned more than 9% of the company and “Twitter’s stock price increased more than 27%,” the suit said.

“Musk paid significantly less for the shares of Twitter common stock he purchased between March 25, 2022 and April 1, 2022 than if he had timely disclosed,” the suit said, adding that he spent more than $500 million acquiring shares during that time period. …”
 


Sure it is intentionally misleading nonsense but it just means he is a marketing genius, right?
 
Back
Top