Trump / Musk (other than DOGE) Omnibus Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 12K
  • Views: 324K
  • Politics 
Zoo_View said:
Fortunately, my parents will never be Trumplicans (or, so I hope. As people age and the brain changes……who knows?!!).

They certainly supported Bernie in 2016. They’re left-wing; but, they’re not LEFTISTS. I completely disagreed with their support of Bernie in 2016 and 2020 - he wasn’t wining the general election.

My parents are aged……not aging…..aged……they’re mid-late-octogenarians. I wouldn’t rub anything in either’s face.

As someone you love ages, things happen.

My Dad and I have great conversations daily and we work on projects most days. He’s 86 - still sharp. As sharp as ever? No.

Mom. She has dementia. It’s accelerating. She’s 85. She’s still functional - just don’t ask her who she just met or what she just ate.
Click to expand...
I'd give my first born child if the worst I had to endure was my parents supporting Bernie Sanders or any other halfway sane republican (not that many of them out there) and not this full blown in your face MAGA cult mentally they now project. My parents are also well aged but their minds are both plenty sharp enough to know exactly what they are getting with their support of Trump and are all in on the cruelty.... I rarely if ever bring up politics with them but they are quick to let me know what's going on in MAGA land after their day spent watching Fox News, so a little "I told you so" here and there is often needed to help try and balance some of the crazy.

I'm fully aware that it sounds pretty shitty for a son to look forward to saying "I told you so" to their parents, but this is where Trump, MAGA and rightwing media have taken our relationship. We are well past the point of being able to have reasonable political discussions and the only thing that brings the MAGA fever down a few degrees are results that you can point to and say "I told you so" - and then it's almost impossible to get that to resonate with their 24/7 Fox News brain rot.
 
Eliminating birthright citizenship aims to take away what is attracting immigrants to the US, but it's really not addressing. MAGA likes this because they want to punish the immigrant (and not affect the white man). Thing is the real magnet is jobs. The enforcement on the persons hiring illegals is lax as heck, but that's an inconvenient action for the MAGA crowd.
 
ZenMode said:
By saying "They don't know what they don't know" means they could have foreseen the changes in our ability to travel via airplane, making birth tourism possible.

What I hope, a think, will eventually happen is there there will be a debate about the spirit of the 14th Amendment. It seems to me that BRC was intended for those who desired to migrate here permanently, not fly here for "vacation", waddle across the border at the 11th hour just to have a kid or were temporarily living here for work (diplomats).

That debate will surely include a reconsidering of what "under jurisdiction of" means.
Click to expand...
If immigrants, documented or not, aren't under the jurisdiction of the United States, how come we can charge them with Federal crimes?
 
StrangePackage said:
If immigrants, documented or not, aren't under the jurisdiction of the United States, how come we can charge them with Federal crimes?
Click to expand...
In addition to the fact that the language of the 14th is not even remotely ambiguous, that’s a big reason SCOTUS settled this issue definitively 127 years ago. No idea why people like Zen are still determined to argue it.
 
ZenMode said:
By saying "They don't know what they don't know" means they could have foreseen the changes in our ability to travel via airplane, making birth tourism possible.

What I hope, a think, will eventually happen is there there will be a debate about the spirit of the 14th Amendment. It seems to me that BRC was intended for those who desired to migrate here permanently, not fly here for "vacation", waddle across the border at the 11th hour just to have a kid or were temporarily living here for work (diplomats).

That debate will surely include a reconsidering of what "under jurisdiction of" means.
Click to expand...
I'll ask this again. Do you believe this debate about the "spirit" of the Amendment should happen with the entire Constitution?
 
farce© said:
Because he believes he is getting under your skin by doing so.
Click to expand...
Probably. And there are things he says here that do bug me. This is not one of them. I couldn’t care less what any MAGAs think about birthright citizenship. I just don’t know why someone would waste time arguing 127 year old SCOTUS precedent should be revisited.
 
lawtig02 said:
Probably. And there are things he says here that do bug me. This is not one of them. I couldn’t care less what any MAGAs think about birthright citizenship. I just don’t know why someone would waste time arguing 127 year old SCOTUS precedent should be revisited.
Click to expand...
Because other posters keep trying to ‘splain it to him after he keeps posting the same bullshit. Rinse and repeat.
 
lawtig02 said:
In addition to the fact that the language of the 14th is not even remotely ambiguous, that’s a big reason SCOTUS settled this issue definitively 127 years ago. No idea why people like Zen are still determined to argue it.
Click to expand...
Zen is a troll, which is why he is on Super Ignore. More upstanding board members should try this feature. Their lives will improve significantly, and they will be spared the indignity of chasing a rabbit with a kazoo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top