Trump / Musk (other than DOGE)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 12K
  • Views: 543K
  • Politics 
I learned today that I don't like Lamelo Ball. I thought he was a good player who had matured since initially bursting on the scene (not surprising given his age at the time of said bursting), but a person who owns a Cybertruck and a Hummer will not obtain my allegiance as a fan.
I get that, but his questionable vehicular choices aren't even in the top 50 reasons to be annoyed with Lamelo.
 

Multiple crosswalk buttons in California were reportedly hacked over the weekend to play AI-generated voices of billionaire tech moguls Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg.

In videos posted across social media, crosswalks in Silicon Valley cities such as Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and Redwood City, the voices of the two figures could be heard.

In one such clip, a crosswalk button, which is normally used to aid the visually impaired, posed as a lonely Musk eager to make friends.

“Hi, I’m Elon. Can we be friends? Will you be my friend? I’ll give you a Cybertruck, I promise,” the voice said. “You don’t know the level of depravity I would stoop to just for a crumb of approval.”
 
My problem is that they keep calling it a truck. I've been around trucks, especially work trucks for over 70 years. Every time I look at it and imagine trying to put something into or take something out of the bed from behind the cab, I shake my fucking head. That ought to have a Tonka name plate because it's a toy.
 
I would love to hear nsair expand on his opinion. I will readily admit that my opinion of anything Tesla is biased because of my feelings about Elon. Trying to put that aside, I find the Cybertruck really unattractive, it doesn't seem to drive well in the conditions you would want a vehicle like that to perform well in, and there have been a number of manufacturing problems with it. I'm curious about what nsair likes about it.
 
I would love to hear nsair expand on his opinion. I will readily admit that my opinion of anything Tesla is biased because of my feelings about Elon. Trying to put that aside, I find the Cybertruck really unattractive, it doesn't seem to drive well in the conditions you would want a vehicle like that to perform well in, and there have been a number of manufacturing problems with it. I'm curious about what nsair likes about it.
I always thought that it looked like what a vehicle looks like at the very edge of your graphics cards rendering distance.
 
My problem is that they keep calling it a truck. I've been around trucks, especially work trucks for over 70 years. Every time I look at it and imagine trying to put something into or take something out of the bed from behind the cab, I shake my fucking head. That ought to have a Tonka name plate because it's a toy.
Tonkas have better build quality and higher resale value.
 
I would love to hear nsair expand on his opinion. I will readily admit that my opinion of anything Tesla is biased because of my feelings about Elon. Trying to put that aside, I find the Cybertruck really unattractive, it doesn't seem to drive well in the conditions you would want a vehicle like that to perform well in, and there have been a number of manufacturing problems with it. I'm curious about what nsair likes about it.

Ok, I guess I should preface by saying I’m not (and never have been!) a Tesla/Elon fanboy, and I don’t think it’s an attractive automobile either. But it’s cool in the sense that it is radically different than anything else on the road today, in an era where cars and trucks are seemingly all converging on the same boring shapes. I grew up paging through car magazines in the 2000s and always wished I could actually own one of the super futuristic concept cars from that time- this is the first one that has come close to approximating that aesthetic.

Secondly, I think there are some cool features- the wildly adjustable air suspension and the rear wheel steering. Those don’t outweigh the many well-publicized problems and impracticalities even if I were in the market for a truck, but it’s cool that they’re there and hopefully will spur other manufacturers to innovate in time.
 

A multiple-Tesla owner in Northern California is suing the automaker, claiming the odometers incorrectly measures milage using a faulty algorithm which ups the supposed miles driven from 15% to 117%. The lawsuit alleges Tesla does this to close out warranties early on their products. The lawsuit, however, stands on a filed patent which may or may not be in use in Tesla vehicles.

Tesla owner Nyree Hinton brought the case against Tesla forward. Here's what they're claiming, according to CarScoops:

The case was filed by Nyree Hinton, who says they bought a 2020 Tesla Model Y in December 2022 with 36,772 miles on it. Hinton states that from December 14, 2022, to February 6, 2023, they averaged 55.54 miles per day, but between March 26, 2023, and June 28, 2023, this spiked to 72.53 miles per day, just as the Model Y was approaching its warranty expiration. The owner estimates that the average mileage should have been roughly 20 miles fewer per day because of their consistent routine during this time.
In the instance of their Model Y, Hinton says they drove 6,086 miles but the Tesla recorded 13,228 miles. The lawsuit is based on a patent that Tesla filed for a seemingly tricky form of recording milage. The patent calls for a "miles-to-electrical energy conversion factor" that would take in factors like charging behavior and road conditions into the calculation of miles traveled instead of a direct recording of miles traveled. The lawsuit alleges Tesla is using this technology instead of mechanical or electrical systems that faithfully record miles traveled, in order to shorten warranties based on miles-driven in the cars.
 
WSJ reporting:

Ashley St. Clair wanted to prove that Elon Musk was the father of her newborn baby.

But to ask the billionaire to take a paternity test, the right-wing social-media influencer had to go through Musk’s longtime fixer, Jared Birchall.

“I don’t want my son to feel like he’s a secret,” St. Clair told Birchall in a two-hour phone call in December.


Birchall offered St. Clair some advice. His boss was a “very big-hearted, kind and generous person,” he said. But Musk had a different side. When a mother of his child goes “the legal route” in these discussions, “that always, always leads to a worse outcome for that woman than what it would have been otherwise,” Birchall told the 26-year-old. Plus, he said, Musk wasn’t sure the child was his.

It wasn’t the first such conversation for Birchall. His public job is running Musk’s family office, and he recently helped organize Musk’s more than $250 million push in support of Donald Trump’s election.

Behind the scenes, Birchall also manages the financial and privacy deals Musk wants for the women raising the world’s richest man’s babies.

Musk has had at least 14 children with four women, including the pop musician Grimes and Shivon Zilis, an executive at his brain computer company Neuralink. Multiple sources close to the tech entrepreneur said they believe the true number of Musk’s children is much higher than publicly known.


Musk offered St. Clair $15 million and $100,000 a month in support in exchange for her silence about the child, whom they named Romulus. Similar agreements had been negotiated with other mothers of Musk’s children, Birchall told St. Clair.

...

Musk’s baby-making project is relevant to his ambition for NASA, which he wants to move faster to go to Mars. He said on X that making people multiplanetary is “critical to ensuring the long-term survival of humanity and all life as we know it.”

In Musk’s dark view of the world, civilization is under threat because of a declining population. He is driven to correct the historic moment by helping seed the earth with more human beings of high intelligence, according to people familiar with the matter.


His businesses are set up to serve the idea: The main objective of SpaceX is to build a rocket ship capable of getting to Mars, and his other companies, including electric-car maker Tesla, help finance the plan.

Musk refers to his offspring as a “legion,” a reference to the ancient military units that could contain thousands of soldiers and were key to extending the reach of the Roman Empire.

During St. Clair’s pregnancy, Musk suggested that they bring in other women to have even more of their children faster. “To reach legion-level before the apocalypse,” he said to St. Clair in a text message viewed by The Wall Street Journal, “we will need to use surrogates.”

He has recruited potential mothers on his social-media platform X, according to some of the people.

Musk has used his wealth to buy the silence of some women who have his kids, according to St. Clair as well as other people, text messages and documents reviewed by the Journal.


Nondisclosure clauses are part of some of the payment agreements. If the mothers push back or seek outside counsel, Musk’s advisers, including Birchall, have threatened financial retribution, according to the documents and people.

Birchall described Musk’s expectations to St. Clair: “Privacy and confidentiality is the top of the list in every aspect of his life, every aspect, and his entire world is set up to be, like, a meritocracy.” Benefits flow, he said, when “people do good work.”

During the call with Birchall, St. Clair told him she had received outreach from a woman Musk had invited to have his baby. She said she was being caught up in Musk’s “harem drama.”

...

While she was pregnant, Musk had urged her to deliver the baby via caesarean section and told her he didn’t want the child to be circumcised. (Musk has posted on X that vaginal births limit brain size and that C-sections allow for larger brains.) St. Clair is Jewish and circumcisions are an important ritual in the religion, and she decided against a C-section. He told her she should have 10 babies, and they debated the child’s middle name.


Once she became visibly pregnant, she mostly stayed inside her apartment so the pregnancy wouldn’t become public, she said. During her pregnancy, Musk instructed Birchall to send St. Clair $2 million for expenses, she said, with half of that amount structured as a loan, according to a text message viewed by the Journal. She used the funds in part to pay for security, which came to more than $100,000 a month, she said.

When she was in the hospital being induced for labor in September, Birchall texted her about leaving Musk’s name off the birth certificate, according to texts viewed by the Journal. Shortly before, she had hired an attorney, something Birchall had warned her not to do.

She complied with the request to not name Musk on the birth certificate. Not long after the birth, Birchall pushed St. Clair to sign documents keeping the father of the baby and details regarding her relationship with Musk secret in return for financial support. The offer was a one-time fee of $15 million for a home and living expenses, plus an additional $100,000 a month until the baby turned 21.


Musk told her by text it was dangerous to reveal his relationship to the baby, describing himself as the “#2 after Trump for assassination.” He added that “only the paranoid survive.”
 
Musk has warned that “civilization is going to crumble” if people don’t start having more children, a view popularized as pronatalism in right-wing circles. The pronatalism movement is composed of people concerned about the birthrate and eager to implement policy and cultural solutions to the problem.

Martin Varsavsky, a friend of Musk’s who founded a large chain of in vitro fertilization clinics in the U.S., said he has spoken with Musk about the risks of falling birthrates.


---------------

^ Makes your mind question things like how many unknown Musk babies are being born to unsuspecting mothers
 
Back
Top