Trump / Musk (other than DOGE)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 12K
  • Views: 544K
  • Politics 

Democrats focus on Elon Musk as they search for a message to fight Trump​

The party has struggled with how to respond to Trump’s aggressive efforts to remake the federal bureaucracy and other controversies.

I actually think this might have some effect. I don't think Elon is nearly as popular as Dear Leader with the country at large and the Democrats might make some headway here if they play their cards right. Whether they will is anybody's guess. I do think it's inevitable that Elon is going to fuck something up to the point that there is an obvious disaster or crisis, and that Trump will likely drop him rather than share any of the blame. Until that happens, though, Elon is just going to continue recklessly crashing through the federal government like a bull in a china shop.
 

THE GOVERNMENT’S COMPUTING EXPERTS SAY THEY ARE TERRIFIED​

Four IT professionals lay out just how destructive Elon Musk’s incursion into the U.S. government could be.


“… The four experts laid out the implications of giving untrained individuals access to the technological infrastructure that controls the country.

Their message is unambiguous: These are not systems you tamper with lightly. Musk and his crew could act deliberately to extract sensitive data, alter fundamental aspects of how these systems operate, or provide further access to unvetted actors. Or they may act with carelessness or incompetence, breaking the systems altogether.

Given the scope of what these systems do, key government services might stop working properly, citizens could be harmed, and the damage might be difficult or impossible to undo.

As one administrator for a federal agency with deep knowledge about the government’s IT operations told us, “I don’t think the public quite understands the level of danger.” …”⚠️ 🚨
 
Shortly after he suggested that the federal government should deploy the young DOGE staffers as air traffic controllers—“We should use some of them in the control towers, where we were putting people that were actually intellectually deficient,” the president said—the same senior White House official quickly dismissed the comment as a serious proposal.

“Lmfao no,” the White House official told WIRED in a text message. “You guys need to learn how to cover him. He was making the point that smart bright people need to be ATC’s [sic.].”

Trump simultaneously suggested the DOGE staffers are young and “very smart,” but also that “some are young, and some are not young. Some are not young at all.”
white house staffers are using "lmfao" in communications with media outlets?

lmfao, indeed.
 
IMG_4909.jpeg
How does the new kickoff rule make football more dangerous?
Wow, he also mentions no interview before the game, I read he didn't do an interview before the last super bowl of his first term, gee I wonder why.
 


"Noone is above the law" [in bold]

Did DOGE turn off the spell check at DOJ?

 


So, over 300,000 people have voted to bring back a virulently racist, inexperienced coder to work unsupervised on government payment and information systems.
 


So, over 300,000 people have voted to bring back a virulently racist, inexperienced coder to work unsupervised on government payment and information systems.

That’s what Twitter has become, from what I can tell. That, and a market value about 15% of what Elon paid for it.
 
Back
Top