Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Trump / Musk (other than DOGE)

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 12K
  • Views: 618K
  • Politics 
Romney twice voted to impeach Trump. Rs and some dems give any Prez (even Trump) more leeway on Cabinet appts. This is far more serious with abuse of authority and likely multiple examples of law-breaking
 


I eat out a lot and have not been subjected the scourge of paper straws very often the last few years now. But I don’t tend to use a straw unless it’s already in my drink or for my giant unsweet tea from Bojangles.
 
nycfan said:


I eat out a lot and have not been subjected the scourge of paper straws very often the last few years now. But I don’t tend to use a straw unless it’s already in my drink or for my giant unsweet tea from Bojangles.
Click to expand...

This is the first Trump EO I can get behind (of course, it is completely unenforceable, except maybe at federal cafeterias).
 

India’s pissed off now:

US officials kept around 100 deported Indian migrants in shackles for their 40-hour flight home, including during bathroom breaks, in the latest incident to spark anger overseas at President Donald Trump’s migration crackdown.

Indian lawmakers demonstrated outside parliament on Thursday, some wearing shackles and others mocking the much-touted friendship between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Elsewhere in New Delhi, members of the youth wing of India’s main opposition party burned an effigy of Trump.
 
nycfan said:


I eat out a lot and have not been subjected the scourge of paper straws very often the last few years now. But I don’t tend to use a straw unless it’s already in my drink or for my giant unsweet tea from Bojangles.
Click to expand...

Now this is honestly something I can get behind. Those paper straws positively suck. Still, this has more of a "class president" vibe, doesn't it? What about the price of eggs?
(ETA: Sorry CFord! Just saw your post above. Great minds think alike! ;)
 


“President Donald Trump said Friday he will announce next week “reciprocal tariffs” affecting all U.S. trading partners, a potentially massive shift in the nation’s approach to foreign trade.

“I’ll be announcing that next week. Reciprocal trade so that we’re treated evenly with other countries. We don’t want any more or any less,” the president said, without offering details.

…“If India, China, or any other country hits us with a 100 or 200 percent tariff on American-made goods, we will hit them with the same exact tariff. In other words, 100 percent is 100 percent. If they charge US, we charge THEM — an eye for an eye, a tariff for a tariff, same exact amount,” he said in 2023.

On Friday, the president described his reciprocal approach as “pretty simple.” But unilaterally overhauling the existing U.S. tariff structure could run afoul of U.S. commitments to the World Trade Organization and would upend global trade patterns.

One former U.S. trade negotiator said the president’s plan would represent the most significant trade policy change since the late 1940s.

“Moving away from what is known as ‘unconditional MFN’ where each WTO member pledges to give to every other member the lowest rate they offer to any country is the biggest change in global trade since” 1947, said John Veroneau, a partner at Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C. …”
 
Continued

“… All WTO members are required to offer the same tariff rates to all other members, with a few exceptions such as in cases of national security. Switching to a reciprocal system would mean scores of different tariff rates for different trading partners.

Individual nations generally choose tariffs to protect industries or products of special importance.

The United States, for example, maintains a 35 percent import tax on pickup trucks made overseas, essentially closing the market to foreign-made models to protect domestic automakers’ most profitable business.

Matching other nations’ tariffs would cause the United States to erect high protective tariffs to defend products that it may not even produce, resulting in higher costs for consumers, according to trade analysts. …”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top