- Messages
- 901
Can we bring this one back to the rule of law please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have identified the things he is doing that I don't like. Those haven't changed. That's not the same as "I don't like the things he is doing"Yea, you know we have post where your alter ego comes out and admits you don't like things he's doing and how he only has one approach to everything.
If Trump doesn't have to, why do I, wwaaahhhh!!Can we bring this one back to the rule of law please.
The part where NYC has the third highest average hotel cost in the country. Surely you've been to NYC. There are no cheap hotels, restaurants, etc.1. They aren't putting them up in expensive hotels. What part of that do you not understand.
Ok. Get them to agree to go somewhere else OR find another way to house them.2. NY doesn't have the power to bus the migrants around. That Desantis and Abbott did so by having them sign phony waivers is not a model that should be emulated.
Because it was politically beneficial to have an open issue. The same reason, for example, legislation is sometimes held up in Congress by one party or the other.3. Why didn't the Pubs just pass the bipartisan immigration bill? That's so much easier than all this convoluted nonsense.
I lived in NYC for years. You're right -- the cost of living is high. Again, what are you complaining about? They maxed out all the other options. You know what NYC doesn't have a lot of? Empty buildings.The part where NYC has the third highest average hotel cost in the country. Surely you've been to NYC. There are no cheap hotels, restaurants, etc.Ok. Get them to agree to go somewhere else OR find another way to house them. Because it was politically beneficial to have an open issue. The same reason, for example, bills are held up in Congress by one party or the other.
As someone that appears to understand the need for checks and balances, and accountability, you cant really be ok with him completely ignoring the guard rails in place to keep the US from becoming a dictatorship, correct?I have identified the things he is doing that I don't like. Those haven't changed. That's not the same as "I don't like the things he is doing"
Ok. Get them to agree to go somewhere else OR find another way to house them.
You are the very definition of woke. You are also the definition of people who were repudiated in the election. So hate away. You are now an afterthought and hopefully will be further neutered over the next 4 years. If I had just been relegated to the trash heap and deemed useless by a majority of voters I'd be angry too. You would be lucky not to shit your pants while holding a gun barneyThe very kind people (not me) on this board and IC have spent 15+ years trying to have good faith discussions with you. They have shared 10's of thousands of reliable sources of information, yet here you are, dumb as ever. Trying to defend the indefensible.
I wouldn't describe myself as woke (calling people woke is like porn to you fake Christians). I would describe myself as hating you. Everything about you is repulsive.
I'm simply here to make fun of you, and god-willing, hopefully take a massive dump on your face while holding one of your guns.
And now you want to have a civil discussion, while Trump is destroying most decent things in this country.
In case I haven't said it before, fuck you, you stupid rube.
I predict that SCOTUS will roll over to preserve the appearance that they still have some legitimacy. Trump and Musk can’t defy SCOTUS if SCOTUS just agrees to everything they want.I know very little about the law, but is it the assumption moving forward that the Trump administration will appeal these rulings to SCOTUS, where we then face the following possibilities?
1) SCOTUS kneecaps the judiciary and Trump wins;
2) SCOTUS retains a shred of legitimacy; Trump backs down;
3) SCOTUS retains a shred of legitimacy; Trump still doesn't back down
You are the very definition of woke.
"As someone that appears to understand the need for checks and balances, and accountability, you cant really be ok with him completely ignoring the guard rails in place to keep the US from becoming a dictatorship, correct?"As someone that appears to understand the need for checks and balances, and accountability, you cant really be ok with him completely ignoring the guard rails in place to keep the US from becoming a dictatorship, correct?
Or are you ok with a dictatorship, as long as it's your dictator.
All his moves are that of a dictator, unless the legal system works and limits his power.
It would allowing me nice if Congress performed a they should, but we know they are scared of him.
Trump policies affect me none at all. A majority of voters are quite stupid like you, I'm shocked.You are the very definition of woke. You are also the definition of people who were repudiated in the election. So hate away. You are now an afterthought and hopefully will be further neutered over the next 4 years. If I had just been relegated to the trash heap and deemed useless by a majority of voters I'd be angry too. You would be lucky not to shit your pants while holding a gun barney
![]()
You are 100% in favor of a dictator, LIAR!!!!!!!!"As someone that appears to understand the need for checks and balances, and accountability, you cant really be ok with him completely ignoring the guard rails in place to keep the US from becoming a dictatorship, correct?"
Correct that I'm not in favor of a dictator regardless on any party affiliation (fully support 2 term limit for potus) and believe very strongly in checks and balances including not eliminating the filibuster.
I don't know.....the border towns, that are actually flooded by migrants and have been for decades, figure it out and I suspect they aren't using a lot hotels because the towns often aren't the type that would have lots of hotels in the first place.I lived in NYC for years. You're right -- the cost of living is high. Again, what are you complaining about? They maxed out all the other options. You know what NYC doesn't have a lot of? Empty buildings.
That's not what he said. Context matters. He said "legitimate power"Vance says the courts have no business restricting the powers of the president
![]()
Outrage after JD Vance claims judges are not allowed to check executive power
Vice-president accused of threatening constitution after saying judges have no right to restrain president’s agendawww.theguardian.com
Find a better place to send them, tell them there's no space here (NYC) and they will be transported to a better option.How, exactly, do you propose they should have done this?
These are more the people you need to talk to and those like them.Find a better place to send them, tell them there's no space here (NYC) and they will be transported to a better option.