Trump Retribution Phase | Trump post demands Bondi prosecute his enemies

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 705
  • Views: 23K
  • Politics 
I know it feels high-minded to withhold judgment, but you're lending credence to currently-unsupported ACCUSATIONS OF TREASON AGAINST AN EX-PRESIDENT. You're carrying their water, and they'll have you carry it as long as they can. They don't need you to believe them. Declining to disbelieve is plenty. It's a heavy fucking charge, and it should be met with extreme skepticism unless and until the administration proves its case.
Yeah, the point isn’t to ever actually find Obama guilty of anything, imo.
They just want to make MAGA feel like their choice for president is the lesser of two evils because they know their guy is a piece of shit human.
 
What exactly would I be apologizing for? I'm the persecuted, helpless minority here? I'm like Andry Romero and you guys are like the el salvadorian prisoners.
1753390649304.gif

I never took you for a coward, but alas.

The offer stands on the "irrefutable proof." You know it's not coming though, which is why you're dodging the question. At some point, you'll realize you're on the wrong side here. The only question is whether it's before or after it all falls apart.
 
I know it feels high-minded to withhold judgment, but you're lending credence to currently-unsupported ACCUSATIONS OF TREASON AGAINST AN EX-PRESIDENT. You're carrying their water, and they'll have you carry it as long as they can. They don't need you to believe them. Declining to disbelieve is plenty. It's a heavy fucking charge, and it should be met with extreme skepticism unless and until the administration proves its case.
Not the same. I'm not tribal in my view of politics. There are plenty of evil, scummy people in the republican party beyond trump. I view trump as a policy or non-human. As an individual, I recognize all his moral and character shortcomings. There is enough proven evidence in the entire topic already where what is alleged is plausible. If what they have is truly incontrovertible then it will be evident.
 
1753390649304.gif

I never took you for a coward, but alas.

The offer stands on the "irrefutable proof." You know it's not coming though, which is why you're dodging the question. At some point, you'll realize you're on the wrong side here. The only question is whether it's before or after it all falls apart.
You haven't told me what I would be apologizing for. I never said I wouldn't play along
 
You haven't told me what I would be apologizing for. I never said I wouldn't play along
"This is about a sitting president colluding with, falsifying intelligence, and aiding the effort to create a fictitious story based on a knowingly false dossier to throw the election and undermine trump's administration."
 
Not the same. I'm not tribal in my view of politics. There are plenty of evil, scummy people in the republican party beyond trump. I view trump as a policy or non-human. As an individual, I recognize all his moral and character shortcomings. There is enough proven evidence in the entire topic already where what is alleged is plausible. If what they have is truly incontrovertible then it will be evident.
I'm not accusing you of being a partisan. I'm accusing you of being a useful idiot.
 
"This is about a sitting president colluding with, falsifying intelligence, and aiding the effort to create a fictitious story based on a knowingly false dossier to throw the election and undermine trump's administration."
So an acknowledgement of innocence? Not an apology? Because I haven't decided he is guilty or not based on what little has been released.
 
So undecided is being an idiot vs. denial without knowing what information is available to provide proof is what?
I didn't say idiot. I said useful idiot, which has a specific meaning, and I draw a distinction between the two.

Per a quick AI summary: "In essence, a 'useful idiot' is someone who is unintentionally serving the interests of a group or individual with more malicious or strategic goals."

And I think the "denial" you're seeing is better categorized as extreme doubt in the face of heavy accusations supported by no new evidence and put forth by an admin in desperate need of a distraction.
 
So an acknowledgement of innocence? Not an apology? Because I haven't decided he is guilty or not based on what little has been released.
The statement you typed is pretty definitive. I assume this means you’re backing away from it now?
 
Unlike you guys I will wait for all the information to come out.
Hey, calla. It's now been two days since Tulsi assured us there's irrefutable proof Obama committed treason. Have you seen it yet? Any idea when we should be expecting to see it? TIA. I just figure you might see it before we do.
 
somewhere Jimmy Breslin is chuckling 😏

 
Back
Top