Trump Retribution Phase | Trump post demands Bondi prosecute his enemies

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 704
  • Views: 23K
  • Politics 
nycfan said:




Trump CIA chief: Brennan, Comey and Hillary Clinton could face indictment​


“… Ratcliffe said that former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper, and former FBI Director James Comey could all face charges relating to what he called a “hoax” about the election.

…
Ratcliffe said there would also be additional information released.

“John Brennan testified to John Durham in August of 2020. He also testified to the House Oversight Committee in 2022. Hillary Clintontestified before John Durham under oath in 2022. James Comey testified before the Senate committee in September, 2020. All of that’s within the last five years. And much of that testimony is frankly, completely inconsistent with what our underlying intelligence that is about to be declassified in the Durham Annex — what that reflects,” he said.

“And so, you know, [Attorney General] Pam Bondi does have a strike force. It is a different Department of Justice, a different FBI, and an opportunity to look at how these people really did conspire to run a hoax, a fraud on the American people and against Donald Trump’s presidency.”“
Click to expand...

Wtf are they talking about?
 
nycfan said:




Trump CIA chief: Brennan, Comey and Hillary Clinton could face indictment​


“… Ratcliffe said that former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper, and former FBI Director James Comey could all face charges relating to what he called a “hoax” about the election.

…
Ratcliffe said there would also be additional information released.

“John Brennan testified to John Durham in August of 2020. He also testified to the House Oversight Committee in 2022. Hillary Clintontestified before John Durham under oath in 2022. James Comey testified before the Senate committee in September, 2020. All of that’s within the last five years. And much of that testimony is frankly, completely inconsistent with what our underlying intelligence that is about to be declassified in the Durham Annex — what that reflects,” he said.

“And so, you know, [Attorney General] Pam Bondi does have a strike force. It is a different Department of Justice, a different FBI, and an opportunity to look at how these people really did conspire to run a hoax, a fraud on the American people and against Donald Trump’s presidency.”“
Click to expand...

Our DOJ and DNI have become the freakin' National Enquirer. smdh
 
Geisterfahrer said:
Fine. Neither is it a meaningful metric that Europe is “laughing at us”, or “sad for us”. WGAF? What matters is how we feel about ourselves, and apart from hardcore MAGA, everyone feels like shit.
Click to expand...
I respectfully disagree...

Historically, the free world respected our country ( before Trump 1 and 2 ) and counted on our leadership when it came to geopolitics.

I'm not sure ( but suspect ) if we are a "laughing stock " in the free world but I'm guessing it's a " what the fuck ? "

I don't think it is unimportant or not meaningful that the free world no longer sees us as the leader of the free world.
 
lawtig02 said:
I don’t understand why we haven’t yet seen the incontrovertible proof Tulsi was talking about. Seems like they’d want to get that out there as soon as possible, doesn’t it? Because if it turns out it doesn’t actually exist, Lindsey and all these other sycophants are going to have to do YET ANOTHER pirouette. Surely they’ll get dizzy at some point?
Click to expand...
It only took them 5 minutes to find it.
 
dukeman92 said:
Click to expand...

maybe this is why Lady G was so desperate to suck the bullshit Tulsi Obama treason meme ?

www.rawstory.com

'MAGA civil war' erupts as Project 2025 mastermind declares Lindsey Graham primary fight

Paul Dans, the former director of the infamous Project 2025, is mounting a brutal primary challenge against establishment Republican Senator Lindsey Graham in South Carolina, setting the stage for an explosive MAGA showdown that could tear the party apart.The conservative operative, who was...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com
 
Geisterfahrer said:
Fine. Neither is it a meaningful metric that Europe is “laughing at us”, or “sad for us”. WGAF? What matters is how we feel about ourselves, and apart from hardcore MAGA, everyone feels like shit.
Click to expand...
You are not wrong about everyone feels like shit. On that we are of a mind.
 
Remember Dan Bongino's cryptic message a week or two ago about "discoveries that chilled him to the bone, that have changed his life forever? There were actually non-MAGAts thinking he was affected by hearing the truth from Ghislaine. Ridiculous. He was prepping MAGAts for more Epstein deflection to join Tulsi, AG Blondi and others with silly Obamagate claims. Well just a week ago he or his office created a FB account, probably other sites as well. Feeding crumbs of nonsense to the cult making them deranged about the "greatest scandal in U.S. history." Today he posted a non-detailed "press release" about a whistleblower coming forward and saying superiors at DOJ forced him to keep pushing "collusion claims" even though said individual and all at DOJ had disproven it at the time. Here is my response to his one week old FB account on this phony release:

"Put up or shut up. Bring receipts and charges, testimony under oath. Only gullible uneducated MAGAts believe. Obviously contrived in steps: 1) Dan sends out cryptic msg. about "discoveries." 2) Create a new FB account (others?)a week ago 3) Flunky responds all day on account 4) *Divert from Epstein, DEFLECTION. Finally, your 2018 tell on Fox, "My life's focus now is to own the Libs." I call BS as a Pub. Disgraceful whining traitor. Crying just a month ago about how hard it is working all day again."
 
nycfan said:


IMG_8194.jpeg
Click to expand...

All of thius of source is a distraction from Epstein and Trump's Failing Tariffs, which are crushing the manufacturing sector and the consumer sector. Since the tariffs are indiscriminatory, except sort of countries by whim, they are consumption taxes on consumers and extra cost by importers and their who are just recovering from COVID.
 
IMG_8432.jpeg





“… John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from “a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump’s presidency.”

… In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Mrs. Clinton approved a plan to tie Mr. Trump to Russia is not credible: Mr. Durham concluded that the email from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured.

Ahead of the 2020 election, Mr. Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence in Mr. Trump’s first term, had declassified and released the crux of the July 27 email, even though he acknowledged doubts about its credibility. Officials did “not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication,” he said.

Among some Trump supporters, the message became known as the “Clinton Plan intelligence,” as Mr. Durham put it in his final report.

In his report, Mr. Durham used the U.S. government’s knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticize F.B.I. officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more skeptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. The dossier, a compendium of Trump-Russia claims compiled by a former British spy, stemmed from a Democratic opposition research effort and was later discredited.

“Whether or not the Clinton Plan intelligence was based on reliable or unreliable information, or was ultimately true or false,” Mr. Durham wrote, agents should have been more cautious when approaching material that appeared to have partisan origins.

Mr. Durham’s report also mentioned that Mrs. Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous, positing that it was Russian disinformation.

But Mr. Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign’s rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the email he called the “Clinton Plan intelligence” was almost certainly a product of Russian disinformation.…”
 
nycfan said:
IMG_8432.jpeg





“… John Ratcliffe, the C.I.A. director, said in a statement that the materials proved that suspicions of Russian collusion stemmed from “a coordinated plan to prevent and destroy Donald Trump’s presidency.”

… In reality, the annex shows the opposite, indicating that a key piece of supposed evidence for the claim that Mrs. Clinton approved a plan to tie Mr. Trump to Russia is not credible: Mr. Durham concluded that the email from July 27, 2016, and a related one dated two days earlier were probably manufactured.

Ahead of the 2020 election, Mr. Ratcliffe, as director of national intelligence in Mr. Trump’s first term, had declassified and released the crux of the July 27 email, even though he acknowledged doubts about its credibility. Officials did “not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication,” he said.

Among some Trump supporters, the message became known as the “Clinton Plan intelligence,” as Mr. Durham put it in his final report.

In his report, Mr. Durham used the U.S. government’s knowledge of the supposed plan, via the Russian memos, to criticize F.B.I. officials involved in the Russia investigation for not being more skeptical when they later received a copy of the Steele dossier and used it to obtain a wiretap order. The dossier, a compendium of Trump-Russia claims compiled by a former British spy, stemmed from a Democratic opposition research effort and was later discredited.

“Whether or not the Clinton Plan intelligence was based on reliable or unreliable information, or was ultimately true or false,” Mr. Durham wrote, agents should have been more cautious when approaching material that appeared to have partisan origins.

Mr. Durham’s report also mentioned that Mrs. Clinton and others in the campaign dismissed the allegation as ridiculous, positing that it was Russian disinformation.

But Mr. Durham banished to the annex concrete details he had found that bolstered her campaign’s rebuttal, burying until now the conclusion that the email he called the “Clinton Plan intelligence” was almost certainly a product of Russian disinformation.…”
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top