Trump seeks $230 million settlement from DoJ

superrific

Master of the ZZLverse
Messages
10,841
He's demanding $230M to settle his lawsuits against the US for investigating him.


More proof of "there is no bottom." This is just straight up stealing money. Embezzlement in the open. I didn't imagine this would happen.

"
President Trump is demanding that the Justice Department pay him about $230 million in compensation for the federal investigations into him, according to people familiar with the matter, who added that any settlement might ultimately be approved by senior department officials who defended him or those in his orbit.

The situation has no parallel in American history, as Mr. Trump, a presidential candidate, was pursued by federal law enforcement and eventually won the election, taking over the very government that must now review his claims. It is also the starkest example yet of potential ethical conflicts created by installing the president’s former lawyers atop the Justice Department.

Mr. Trump submitted complaints through an administrative claim process that often is the precursor to lawsuits. The first claim, lodged in late 2023, seeks damages for a number of purported violations of his rights, including the F.B.I. and special counsel investigation into Russian election tampering and possible connections to the 2016 Trump campaign, according to people familiar with the matter. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because the claim has not been made public.

The second complaint, filed in the summer of 2024, accuses the F.B.I. of violating Mr. Trump’s privacy by searching Mar-a-Lago, his club and residence in Florida, in 2022 for classified documents. It also accuses the Justice Department of malicious prosecution in charging him with mishandling sensitive records after he left office.
Lawyers said the nature of the claims posed undeniable ethics challenges.

“What a travesty,” said Bennett L. Gershman, an ethics professor at Pace University. “The ethical conflict is just so basic and fundamental, you don’t need a law professor to explain it.”

He added: “And then to have people in the Justice Department decide whether his claim should be successful or not, and these are the people who serve him deciding whether he wins or loses. It’s bizarre and almost too outlandish to believe.”

Even the president seemed to acknowledge that point in the Oval Office last week, when he alluded vaguely to the situation while standing next to the F.B.I. director, Kash Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and her deputy, Todd Blanche. According to Justice Department regulations, the deputy attorney general — in this case, Mr. Blanche — is one of two people eligible to sign off on such a settlement.

“I have a lawsuit that was doing very well, and when I became president, I said, I’m sort of suing myself. I don’t know, how do you settle the lawsuit, I’ll say give me X dollars, and I don’t know what to do with the lawsuit,” Mr. Trump said, adding: “It sort of looks bad, I’m suing myself, right? So I don’t know. But that was a lawsuit that was very strong, very powerful.”
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He's demanding $230M to settle his lawsuits against the US for investigating him.


More proof of "there is no bottom." This is just straight up stealing money. Embezzlement in the open. I didn't imagine this would happen.

"
President Trump is demanding that the Justice Department pay him about $230 million in compensation for the federal investigations into him, according to people familiar with the matter, who added that any settlement might ultimately be approved by senior department officials who defended him or those in his orbit.

The situation has no parallel in American history, as Mr. Trump, a presidential candidate, was pursued by federal law enforcement and eventually won the election, taking over the very government that must now review his claims. It is also the starkest example yet of potential ethical conflicts created by installing the president’s former lawyers atop the Justice Department.

Mr. Trump submitted complaints through an administrative claim process that often is the precursor to lawsuits. The first claim, lodged in late 2023, seeks damages for a number of purported violations of his rights, including the F.B.I. and special counsel investigation into Russian election tampering and possible connections to the 2016 Trump campaign, according to people familiar with the matter. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because the claim has not been made public.

The second complaint, filed in the summer of 2024, accuses the F.B.I. of violating Mr. Trump’s privacy by searching Mar-a-Lago, his club and residence in Florida, in 2022 for classified documents. It also accuses the Justice Department of malicious prosecution in charging him with mishandling sensitive records after he left office.
Lawyers said the nature of the claims posed undeniable ethics challenges.

“What a travesty,” said Bennett L. Gershman, an ethics professor at Pace University. “The ethical conflict is just so basic and fundamental, you don’t need a law professor to explain it.”

He added: “And then to have people in the Justice Department decide whether his claim should be successful or not, and these are the people who serve him deciding whether he wins or loses. It’s bizarre and almost too outlandish to believe.”

Even the president seemed to acknowledge that point in the Oval Office last week, when he alluded vaguely to the situation while standing next to the F.B.I. director, Kash Patel, Attorney General Pam Bondi, and her deputy, Todd Blanche. According to Justice Department regulations, the deputy attorney general — in this case, Mr. Blanche — is one of two people eligible to sign off on such a settlement.

“I have a lawsuit that was doing very well, and when I became president, I said, I’m sort of suing myself. I don’t know, how do you settle the lawsuit, I’ll say give me X dollars, and I don’t know what to do with the lawsuit,” Mr. Trump said, adding: “It sort of looks bad, I’m suing myself, right? So I don’t know. But that was a lawsuit that was very strong, very powerful.”
But he gave up his $400k presidential salary because he didn’t need the money.
 
Last edited:
If Trump would just use his creativity for honest work rather then corruption and scamming, there would be no limits to what good he could accomplish.
 
Fox News: A king wouldn’t demand $230 million he would just take it

I read something from a lawyer that knew Blanche and the firm he used to be with. He said it was likely Blanche was getting around $50 million for all the defense work he was doing for trump (some here might have opinions on the accuracy of this statement). Now Blanche could sign off on giving trump $230 million???

Waste
Fraud
Abuse
Transparency
 
I don’t know who’s behind the timing of this article. It’s just another extreme example of trump corruption against the backdrop of a government shutdown.

Thousands of people losing their jobs. Farmers losing their asses. Important government services shut off. Air travel disruptions.

All while “not a king trump” demands $230 million from the justice department and is handing Argentina $20 billion.

The fuck is going on??? Is war porn in American cities really distracting magats enough that they can’t see what’s happening?

I fucking hate this people
 
If Trump would just use his creativity for honest work rather then corruption and scamming, there would be no limits to what good he could accomplish.
That's not true as Trump accomplishes very little of actual value to the world, even when he tries.

His skills are in bullying and using the system to his advantage, there's little in that skillset that makes the world a better place.
 
It is completely and absurdly outrageous that SCOTUS has granted the president immunity from civil claims and criminal liability for official acts, but the president is still able to pursue civil claims against the government for official acts. It's difficult to imagine a more illogical and counterproductive legal framework than that.

I truly, deeply hope that even the most ardent MAGAs on this board -- even Pandemic Blue, for God's sake -- would denounce this travesty of justice.
 
It is completely and absurdly outrageous that SCOTUS has granted the president immunity from civil claims and criminal liability for official acts, but the president is still able to pursue civil claims against the government for official acts. It's difficult to imagine a more illogical and counterproductive legal framework than that.

I truly, deeply hope that even the most ardent MAGAs on this board -- even Pandemic Blue, for God's sake -- would denounce this travesty of justice.
I'm quite confident that there is civil immunity for the prosecutors and the government. That is what makes the bribery all the more appalling. The government doesn't owe the money but is paying it anyway. Trump's grift continues unchecked. So much for the DOGE efficiency.
 
It is completely and absurdly outrageous that SCOTUS has granted the president immunity from civil claims and criminal liability for official acts, but the president is still able to pursue civil claims against the government for official acts. It's difficult to imagine a more illogical and counterproductive legal framework than that.

I truly, deeply hope that even the most ardent MAGAs on this board -- even Pandemic Blue, for God's sake -- would denounce this travesty of justice.
I wouldn't call this a "travesty of justice." I would call it the most open, unapologetic, and uncaring form of corruption imaginable. Trump has basically created this bizarro world where he just doesn't hide corruption and jedi mind tricks his voters into believing that it can't actually be corrupt or Trump would be hiding it. If not even this - a direct cash payment from the US treasury to a sitting president of hundreds of millions of dollars based on a frankly ludicrous legal claim - isn't a bridge too far, then we'll just have to accept that Trump could literally say "income tax is now payable to me personally" and half the country wouldn't bat an eye.
 
I'm quite confident that there is civil immunity for the prosecutors and the government. That is what makes the bribery all the more appalling. The government doesn't owe the money but is paying it anyway. Trump's grift continues unchecked. So much for the DOGE efficiency.
I would hope so, but I'm having a hard time figuring out if there's a line SCOTUS will draw when it comes to Trump and his consolidation of power.
 
I truly, deeply hope that even the most ardent MAGAs on this board -- even Pandemic Blue, for God's sake -- would denounce this travesty of justice.
95% of MAGA won’t understand why it’s an issue, 3% will understand why it’s a giant issue but won’t care, and 2% will shrug it off with some form of, “I disagree with it but I’m not going to agree with everything he does.”

Of the Trump voters here, a lot of them fit into the 2% category.
 
I would hope so, but I'm having a hard time figuring out if there's a line SCOTUS will draw when it comes to Trump and his consolidation of power.
How does this case even end up before SCOTUS, I wonder? I don't think the court will recognize any general taxpapyer standing to bring suit.
 
Back
Top