Trump to take over D.C. Law Enforcement

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 18K
  • Politics 
ZZLPHeels said:
Let's take a look at the data. We'll start with counties, since listing most dangerous cities alone would be unfair to rural areas. The most recent data I was able to find on a county level was from 2017, but here are the top 10 most dangerous counties in the U.S. by homicide rate per capita, along with their racial demographics and their voting behavior in the 2024 Presidential Election.

1. Orleans Parish, Louisiana. 53% black, 31% white. Harris 82%, Trump 15%.
2. Coahoma County, Mississippi. 75% black, 20% white. Harris 72%, Trump 27%.
3. Phillips County, Arkansas. 62% black, 33% white. Harris 56%, Trump 43%.
4. St Louis City, Missouri. 42% black, 42% white. Harris 81%, Trump 16%.
5. Baltimore City, Maryland. 57% black, 28% white. Harris 84%, Trump 12%.
6. Petersburg City, Virginia. 73% black, 15% white. Harris 85%, Trump 13%.
7. Macon County, Alabama. 79% black, 16% white. Harris 78%, Trump 21%.
8. District of Columbia. 41% black, 39% white. Harris 92%, Trump 6%.
9. Washington County, Mississippi. 71% black, 25% white. Harris 64%, Trump 34%.
10. Dallas County, Alabama. 70% black, 27% white. Harris 66%, Trump 33%.

Now, if you go to the city level to look at the same statistics, you will see a very similar finding.
Click to expand...
Why do you think black men commit a disproportionate number of the murders in USA?
 
StrangePackage said:
Answer the fucking question.

You consider it to be a waste of taxpayer money to prevent people from suffering and dying of preventable diseases?

If you're a shit person just wear that. I personally would love it if more of my tax money went to preventing unnecessary suffering, both in America and elsewhere. To me, that is the least wasteful purpose to which my tax dollars could possibly be put.

It's certainly less wasteful than calling in the National guard to put on a puppet show in jack boots. That you can't distinguish the two is incredibly damning for you both intellectually and morally.
Click to expand...
I think what he is saying is, sometimes you have to make a choice, a hard one, and if there are people in this country who need the exact same help as people in other countries and there is only so much money to go around, then the US's responsibility is to make sure our citizens are taken care first and foremost before we try to take care of anyone else.
 
Carolina Fever said:
We have more than enough resources to help Americans and other people in the world. Instead, it's wasted on stupid crap like this with Trump.
Click to expand...
If we have all of these extra resources, how have we gotten ourselves 36 trillion dollars in debt? Are we providing any of these resources with borrowed money?
 
PandemicBlue said:
If we have all of these extra resources, how have we gotten ourselves 36 trillion dollars in debt? Are we providing any of these resources with borrowed money?
Click to expand...
Are you another one who can't do basic arithmetic? I'll give you a hint as to what happens when you add negative numbers together for a while. They become a bigger negative number (technically lesser; the absolute value is bigger -- but I'm trying to keep it simple). Follow this chain of thought for a minute and you might learn something.
 
superrific said:
1. They were arrested. They weren't convicted. You have no idea if they actually are criminals.
2. Arresting people is only a good thing if it's warranted. Otherwise it's tyranny. All that Don't Tread On Me bullshit from you guys -- it was all bullshit, right? You never ever ever cared about freedom. You just wanted to break the law without your white ass ending up in prison.
Click to expand...
Ok then, ow many of them do you think would have been arrested so we can find out if they are criminals. The thing is, they can be proven as criminals and some punk ass liberal judge will release them right back on the street. That is how you find out someone who commits a crime has x number of violent felonies in their past only to be allowed to continue to walk the streets and victimize someone else.
 
McAdooSmackinYou said:
I thought Bo was a changed man. Looks like I was right to be skeptical about that.
Click to expand...
He claimed he was to stop everyone from putting him on super-ignore at the outset. Many wise people put him on super ignore within a few days of the so-called "no, really I've changed" sob story as that how long it took to back into full troll mode.
 
PandemicBlue said:
Ok then, ow many of them do you think would have been arrested so we can find out if they are criminals. The thing is, they can be proven as criminals and some punk ass liberal judge will release them right back on the street. That is how you find out someone who commits a crime has x number of violent felonies in their past only to be allowed to continue to walk the streets and victimize someone else.
Click to expand...
After the defendant has been sentenced, the judge normally has no power to "let them walk the streets." That's up to the legislature and parole board. The judge has to abide by sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimums AND maximums.

Again you have no idea what you're talking about. It isn't a mystery how our system of government works. I don't know why you fail to understand the judicial role, but whatever, you do you.
 
superrific said:
Are you another one who can't do basic arithmetic? I'll give you a hint as to what happens when you add negative numbers together for a while. They become a bigger negative number (technically lesser; the absolute value is bigger -- but I'm trying to keep it simple). Follow this chain of thought for a minute and you might learn something.
Click to expand...
I know this, money is money no matter how you add it up and when you spend more than you have you get in debt. And we have gotten great at spending more than we have.

But we are the richest country in the world, aren't we? I need to find someone who will lend me 500 billion so I can be the richest man in the world. It will be all good unless I'm expected to have to pay any of it back.
 
altmin said:
He claimed he was to stop everyone from putting him on super-ignore at the outset. Many wise people put him on super ignore within a few days of the so-called "no, really I've changed" sob story as that how long it took to back into full troll mode.
Click to expand...
ZZLP is Bo? I don't think he's trolling. I think he believes what he says.
 
superrific said:
ZZLP is Bo? I don't think he's trolling. I think he believes what he says.
Click to expand...
He had some super long post about how he was in a bad place at one point or something which led him to post in a trollful way and he felt really bad about it and blah blah blah. he got a lot of sympathy from people then immediately went back to the behavior he claimed to regret. i am sure someone can dig up the thread.
 
lawtig02 said:
Arrests are lower week over week, year over year, dumbass
Click to expand...
If there were a 1000 crimes last year and 999 this year, I guess the anyone could claim that crime is dropping. And although it would be shocking to see a Democrat lie, it looks like they just might have been cooking the books when it comes to these crime statistics. You can choose to believe these historical liars if you like but just remember, you just called me the dumbass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top