Trump to take over D.C. Law Enforcement

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 18K
  • Politics 
PandemicBlue said:
If there were a 1000 crimes last year and 999 this year, I guess the anyone could claim that crime is dropping. And although it would be shocking to see a Democrat lie, it looks like they just might have been cooking the books when it comes to these crime statistics. You can choose to believe these historical liars if you like but just remember, you just called me the dumbass.
Click to expand...
Um, they weren't cooking the books. That's a stupid lie with no foundation, dumbass. You can't even handle elementary school finance; why are you calling other people names?
 
superrific said:
After the defendant has been sentenced, the judge normally has no power to "let them walk the streets." That's up to the legislature and parole board. The judge has to abide by sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimums AND maximums.

Again you have no idea what you're talking about. It isn't a mystery how our system of government works. I don't know why you fail to understand the judicial role, but whatever, you do you.
Click to expand...
The only way anything is decided on this planet is there are people making decisions on whatever level and you know damn well if there is someone who leaves people in shock to find out that they have been allowed to continue to live in society with a glaring history of violent behavior that should leave no doubt that they are a threat to society, that decision was not made by a conservative. Those decisions are almost entirely made by the progressive left. It is a result of Democrat policies. It is just a shame that everyone, of all parties, are in danger as a result.
 
PandemicBlue said:
The only way anything is decided on this planet is there are people making decisions on whatever level and you know damn well if there is someone who leaves people in shock to find out that they have been allowed to continue to live in society with a glaring history of violent behavior that should leave no doubt that they are a threat to society, that decision was not made by a conservative. Those decisions are almost entirely made by the progressive left. It is a result of Democrat policies. It is just a shame that everyone, of all parties, are in danger as a result.
Click to expand...
Do you need help with remedial grammar as well? What the hell is that monstrous world salad that comprises your first "sentence." That's uglier than Sarah Huckabee Sanders wrestling a hog.

But anyway, it would seem that you agree Trump is not a conservative, because nobody in America has ever freed more people that fit your description.
 
superrific said:
Um, they weren't cooking the books. That's a stupid lie with no foundation, dumbass. You can't even handle elementary school finance; why are you calling other people names?
Click to expand...
And exactly how do you know whether or not the any book-cooking has gone on? Are you in charge of crime stats in Washington DC? You don't know any more than anyone else. You are just more prone to believe the bullshit fed to you by the liberal media. I guess you still believe all those videos showing your boy Joe wandering around looking lost were cheapfakes? You were told they were by the same people who are now telling you everything is great in DC so I guess so.
 
PandemicBlue said:
If there were a 1000 crimes last year and 999 this year, I guess the anyone could claim that crime is dropping. And although it would be shocking to see a Democrat lie, it looks like they just might have been cooking the books when it comes to these crime statistics. You can choose to believe these historical liars if you like but just remember, you just called me the dumbass.
Click to expand...
Can you help me understand how the folks who were cooking the books and intentionally underreporting crime actually arrested more people than the current takeover has? I dont get that.
 
PandemicBlue said:
And exactly how do you know whether or not the any book-cooking has gone on? Are you in charge of crime stats in Washington DC? You don't know any more than anyone else. You are just more prone to believe the bullshit fed to you by the liberal media. I guess you still believe all those videos showing your boy Joe wandering around looking lost were cheapfakes? You were told they were by the same people who are now telling you everything is great in DC so I guess so.
Click to expand...
You seem angry. Are you angry?
 
PandemicBlue said:
And exactly how do you know whether or not the any book-cooking has gone on? Are you in charge of crime stats in Washington DC? You don't know any more than anyone else. You are just more prone to believe the bullshit fed to you by the liberal media. I guess you still believe all those videos showing your boy Joe wandering around looking lost were cheapfakes? You were told they were by the same people who are now telling you everything is great in DC so I guess so.
Click to expand...
You could get me drunk, stoned and then beat my ass until I had a concussion and I would still know more than you, and it wouldn't be close.
 
superrific said:
Do you need help with remedial grammar as well? What the hell is that monstrous world salad that comprises your first "sentence." That's uglier than Sarah Huckabee Sanders wrestling a hog.

But anyway, it would seem that you agree Trump is not a conservative, because nobody in America has ever freed more people that fit your description.
Click to expand...
I don't think Trump is a traditional conservative. Nor do I want him to be one if it means he bends to a party's every whim. I want common sense to be the foundation of his decisions, not some sense of obligation to a party that outweighs what common sense tells you is the right thing to do.
 
PandemicBlue said:
And exactly how do you know whether or not the any book-cooking has gone on? Are you in charge of crime stats in Washington DC? You don't know any more than anyone else. You are just more prone to believe the bullshit fed to you by the liberal media. I guess you still believe all those videos showing your boy Joe wandering around looking lost were cheapfakes? You were told they were by the same people who are now telling you everything is great in DC so I guess so.
Click to expand...
Until more complete evidence is provided, you go with the evidence that is available. You are giving off major "were you there??" energy.
 
superrific said:
You could get me drunk, stoned and then beat my ass until I had a concussion and I would still know more than you, and it wouldn't be close.
Click to expand...
So, the CliffNotes version is, you don't know shit but are just regurgitating what you are told by the people who need you to remain in a state of not knowing shit so you will continue voting against your own self-interest? Got it.
 
PandemicBlue said:
I think what he is saying is, sometimes you have to make a choice, a hard one, and if there are people in this country who need the exact same help as people in other countries and there is only so much money to go around, then the US's responsibility is to make sure our citizens are taken care first and foremost before we try to take care of anyone else.
Click to expand...
Except you fuckers never do that. Ever. In fact you try to hurt people, rather than care for them. The most recent budget slashes medical services to the most needy communities.

So stop fucking lying. You're bad at it.
 
PandemicBlue said:
So, the CliffNotes version is, you don't know shit but are just regurgitating what you are told by the people who need you to remain in a state of not knowing shit so you will continue voting against your own self-interest? Got it.
Click to expand...
Actually, I looked up the case on which the allegation of book-cooking is based. I read all the publicly available information about the case, including the "whistleblower's" call with the sergeant about whom she complained. All of it. And from that, I judged that the claim was bullshit because she was complaining about a single charging decision that seemed entirely reasonable. Oh, and they were downgrading thefts of less than $25 from "theft II" to a lesser offense; max of 180 days versus max of 90 days.

So, what have you looked up? What's your research? Oh.

See, here's the problem: you MAGAs assume that everyone else is like you, glued to your TV news propaganda. Some of us actually know things, and when we don't know them, we go out and learn them. I don't take anything at face value, if I can help it. I always check the primary sources.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top