Trump to take over D.C. Policing | Chicago Next

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 25K
  • Politics 
IMG_9220.jpeg

Chef Andres is in and out of Gaza enough he should watch his back and beware a double-tap.
I'd like to see some polling on this claim. When you live in a high crime area, I suspect that most people will not mind a little inconvenience to be able to safely walk around their neighborhood.
 
Yes. Seeing military, like law enforcement in general, can be reassuring.

Other countries have cheered the arrival of the US military.
NOBODY feels reassured when armed military patrols their streets without oversight.

Do you think all those demonstrations in DC and LA were multitudes of people thanking the military for “reassuring” them?

GTFO with that nonsense.
 
Yes. Seeing military, like law enforcement in general, can be reassuring.

Other countries have cheered the arrival of the US military.
The minor inconvenience of living in a militarized police state. I actually don’t want to see polling, a big chunk of the American right are clearly in support.
 
I think it’s safe to say that the presence of a militaristic police state will typically reduce crime; at least temporarily until people start figuring out how to work around if it is present for the long term. But living in a militaristic police state is not a palatable substitute for crime. In other words, I don’t think most people want either crime or military personnel patrolling their community.
 
The minor inconvenience of living in a militarized police state. I actually don’t want to see polling, a big chunk of the American right are clearly in support.
If we miraculously get a Democratic President in 2028, and a particularly vengeful one at that, I wonder how many right-wing fucksticks would be applauding him/her for sending armed troops into places like Hattiesburg, Mississippi and Memphis, Tennessee under the guise of “cleaning up crime?”

My guess is that suddenly states rights would become paramount again.

Hypocritical pieces of shit, all of them.
 
If we miraculously get a Democratic President in 2028, and a particularly vengeful one at that, I wonder how many right-wing fucksticks would be applauding him/her for sending armed troops into places like Hattiesburg, Mississippi and Memphis, Tennessee under the guise of “cleaning up crime?”

My guess is that suddenly states rights would become paramount again.

Hypocritical pieces of shit, all of them.
Oh hell yeah. Had Obama or Biden tried this shit, Pubs would be riling up militias to take up arms to fight against this tyranny.
 
If we miraculously get a Democratic President in 2028, and a particularly vengeful one at that, I wonder how many right-wing fucksticks would be applauding him/her for sending armed troops into places like Hattiesburg, Mississippi and Memphis, Tennessee under the guise of “cleaning up crime?”

My guess is that suddenly states rights would become paramount again.

Hypocritical pieces of shit, all of them.
The "Don't Tread On Me" dipshits will be out in full force.
 
I think it’s safe to say that the presence of a militaristic police state will typically reduce crime; at least temporarily until people start figuring out how to work around if it is present for the long term. But living in a militaristic police state is not a palatable substitute for crime. In other words, I don’t think most people want either crime or military personnel patrolling their community.
 


“… privately, Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson began discussing what they could do to shield Chicago from a federal deployment like those underway in two other Democrat-run cities with Black mayors, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.

Their conclusion: not much….”
 
NOBODY feels reassured when armed military patrols their streets without oversight.
You can't speak for anyone but yourself.
Do you think all those demonstrations in DC and LA were multitudes of people thanking the military for “reassuring” them?
There will always be someone against anything. There's no reason to believe those protesters reflect the opinion of the entire district.
GTFO with that nonsense.
Take your own advice.
 
Back
Top