Trump to take over D.C. Policing | Chicago Next

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 32K
  • Politics 

Haha. I was in court yesterday when the grand jury foreperson came in with the bills of indictment that the gran jury considered. The grand jury had 250 bills to consider and indicted on all 250 of them. I can almost guarantee that some of those are weak cases that will eventually get dismissed. It’s hard not to get a case indicted.
 
So all city residents are required to have their cities' parks, sidewalks and common areas ruined by the homelessness until we figure out a way to solve the entire homelessness problem?
My answer is “yes”, until appropriate housing or regulated campgrounds are built, as is in the works in numerous cities.
 
The Democrats don't want any help in the warzones they call safe neighborhoods because they don't want their incompetence exposed.
I live in an area you call a war zone. I have zero concerns about my safety. Go fuck yourself, you racist piece of shit. You've never even been to these places that you so comfortably disparage.

I will add that those "warzones" subsidize your fat white ass. Your entire community just mooches off the tax revenue created by places like Chicago, New York City, Los Angeles, etc,
 
Y

To re-ask the question that's been asked earlier - what's your solution to homelessness?

I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
 
I guess then you agree with Brandon Johnson who proclaimed at the “Workers Over Billionaires” rally that Chicago was built by slavers and indigenous peoples? Woke > actual history = virtue signaling to please other liberals.

Agree. It's the same thing with the homeless and the encampments which hurt the quality of life in many big cities. Trump goes in and cleans out Union Square and gets rid of the homeless encampments in the various parks which instantly improves the life of the residents and tourists alike. This is a major embarrassment to city mayors and a governor like Newsom since California's homelessness crisis has exploded during his watch.

It doesn't really matter where the homeless go since it's the Mayor's duty to keep his/her city clean and safe. The State and Federal governments need to address the larger issues of homelessness.
1. I didn't hear Brandon Johnson say anything about Chicago being built by slaves and indigenous peoples. He said something about "this land" being built that way. Do you dispute that slaves and indigenous people (and Chinese) built much of America? Or maybe the problem is that you don't think Chicago is part of "this land"? Or maybe you have listening comprehension problems? Or maybe you get your news from Jesse Fucking Watters?

2. Are you really going to try to bring "actual history" into this? That is like UNC football begging for a game against the Chiefs. Plus, your guy doesn't even know who Frederick Douglass was.
 
I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
"Rural camp sites" for homeless people. Great idea.
1756912865365.png
 
I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses? WTF? You're a psychiatrist now?

When you are making up complete horseshit to justify something that can't be justified, do you think maybe you should reflect on how you got here?
 
I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
This is, at least, a start. Can you clarify what you mean by "rural camp sites" and "appropriate treatment"?
 
I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
That at least is a concept of a plan. Maybe expand on and advocate for this instead of just cheering shooing homeless people from one area to another. If you move a homeless person out of a tent or off a sidewalk, it's not like they just go home.
 
I don't have all the answers and haven't claimed to have them. Probably a combination of rural camp sites where they can receive the appropriate treatment and finding a way to place a number of them in mental institutions for full time treatments. Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses so you need to get them out of the cities for their sake (and the residents). Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.

I do not know how anyone could read this post and come to any other conclusion except that you're a bat shit crazy lunatic.
 
Unfortunately, I think you'll find that some percentage of the homeless who enjoy the lifestyle of hanging out and taking drugs all day.
Ding, ding ding. That last sentence shows you are so close to understanding. Do you think homeless people will voluntarily relocate to rural camps? No, they won’t. And when you tear down an encampment, they just relocate and start a new encampment.

That doesn’t mean you never remove encampments for public safety reasons. It just means that “cleaning up” the encampments does not solve anything on a long-term basis.
 
Rural settings are best for a number of mental illnesses? WTF? You're a psychiatrist now?

When you are making up complete horseshit to justify something that can't be justified, do you think maybe you should reflect on how you got here?
The inability to reflect is a hallmark of maga.

Themes that dominate maga include never apologize, never admit a mistake, empathy is for pussies, I know as much as any expert on any subject, my values are whatever trump said today.

Magats are in a state of perpetual arrested development. Growth is weakness.
 
Celebrating throwing away tents of people without homes or other shelter …
I think many people, mostly Maga types but perhaps no small number of non-Magas, wouldn't be upset or even phased if someone, maybe even law enforcement, went into homeless camps and wholesale murdered the people living there. The homeless are considered trash people, if they're even afforded that modicum of humanity in the imaginations of the people who hate them. If they are treated like trash and simply gotten rid of, that would seem like a perfectly appropriate way of handling the homeless "situation" to these people...
 
Back
Top