UNC basketball 2026 transfer portal

1 ) At this point players are also employees

2 ) Given your assumption that Caleb will get a 10 million contract and get a lucrative NBA extension then I agree that it would be illogical to accept a two year contract for 8 million/year as long as you are sure you will not be have a season ending injury, get 10 million/yr and get a lucrative NBA extension after your 2nd year.

I'm a conservative investor and financial advisor so my inclination is to lock in the 16 million contract with a free out after the 1st year and if you recover from your injury and have an even better next year and you could be the college POY and the #1 pick in the NBA draft and collect millions upon millions upon millions in endorsements on top of the millions upon millions for salary and bennies from the NBA
There is no financial advisor worth his/her salt that would ever recommend a top 5 player foregoing the NBA for a year.

I think you are trying to make fetch happen. It won’t.
 
1 ) At this point players are also employees
It may be obvious in practice to everyone that they are, but legally they are not. And it is important to the schools that they not be, which is why they fought so long for their amateurism model.
2 ) Given your assumption that Caleb will get a 10 million contract and get a lucrative NBA extension then I agree that it would be illogical to accept a two year contract for 8 million/year as long as you are sure you will not be have a season ending injury, get 10 million/yr and get a lucrative NBA extension after your 2nd year.

I'm a conservative investor and financial advisor so my inclination is to lock in the 16 million contract with a free out after the 1st year and if you recover from your injury and have an even better next year and you could be the college POY and the #1 pick in the NBA draft and collect millions upon millions upon millions in endorsements on top of the millions upon millions for salary and bennies from the NBA
I'm not following here. In either scenario - injured or not injured - Caleb makes more money in the pros. There is no scenario in which the college contract for less guaranteed money helps him. And in any event. Caleb would not get a big extension after two years in the NBA. NBA teams have team options for years 3 and 4 (that get picked up approximately 100% of the time for top 10 picks) and he can't get the extension until year 5.
 
I still don't think this system is feasible in the long run, as every year it seems like the price to obtain top (or even average) talent just keeps going up and up. It's like the Wild West, and players ae increasingly able to name their price. And the reality is that fewer and fewer schools are going to be able to keep up and more and more schools are going to be left out. Eventually (not this year or likely next year, but at some point) some group is going to have to step in and start putting some rules and restrictions back into the game, or you're going to end up the with same dozen or so schools dominating the pay-for-play game every single year.
look at who's won national championships over the years... it's the same schools.

Why should someone step in if the schools are willing to pay it, the kids will accept it.

This will stop when it becomes a bad deal for the teams... it's clearly not a bad deal for the teams.
 
Just don’t feel like colleges should be in the business of minor league sports. I’m not even sure if it’s helping the education budget anymore.
Did college sports ever help the education budget?

Seriously, which universities receive money for the academic side of the campus from the athletic side?
 
Did college sports ever help the education budget?

Seriously, which universities receive money for the academic side of the campus from the athletic side?
Pretty much never
Granted many rich folks that are attracted to sports give to the "library" or whatever when asked
But no
Never
 
Pretty much never
Granted many rich folks that are attracted to sports give to the "library" or whatever when asked
But no
Never
The largest donor to the Smith Center, Walter R. Davis, Elizabeth City and Texas oil tycoon, was usually reluctant to donate big money to athletics.

He was the largest donor to what became the Walter Royal Davis Library.

Skipper Bowles and others prevailed upon Davis to donate $1.5 million to the Smith Center. They succeeded. Davis was more generous to academics than sports.

The Cone Family in Greensboro donated more to academics and arts than to sports. The patriarch of the branch I knew (several grandchildren in Chapel Hill) donated to the Rams Club and to the Smith Center so that his grandkids had great seats (2 in Row F/G in Carmichael directly opposite Coach Smith’s nose) and 2 in the row immediately above the break in Carmichael (also directly opposite Coach Smith). The patriarch donated $25K to the Smith Center; and, that bought the rights to 4 seats about 20-25 rows up at about mid-court.

The Cones donated many multiples of $25K to UNC before and after the Smith Center fundraising campaign.

The Hanes?

CD Spangler?
 
Did college sports ever help the education budget?
Indirectly, I would say yes.

Schools that win championships or have great seasons in the big sports can definitely generate monetary value on the education side. Winning seasons can boost application numbers which allows schools to be more selective, which increases reputation and prestige. Its called the Flutie Effect. Alumni donate more. Merchandise sales spike. Schools receive greater media exposure and brand value. I wouldn't say the bump is consistent or even that significant, but I think traditionally college sports was viewed generally as school marketing.
 
Indirectly, I would say yes.

Schools that win championships or have great seasons in the big sports can definitely generate monetary value on the education side. Winning seasons can boost application numbers which allows schools to be more selective, which increases reputation and prestige. Its called the Flutie Effect. Alumni donate more. Merchandise sales spike. Schools receive greater media exposure and brand value. I wouldn't say the bump is consistent or even that significant, but I think traditionally college sports was viewed generally as school marketing.
Tell the University of Chicago that it should “invest” in sports to increase donations and its endowment.

Northwestern has poured 10’s, maybe 100’s of millions into sports and it continues to suck in revenue sports; but, donations to its endowment keep increasing and its prestige as a university is great.

Williams, Amherst, Bowdoin, Wellesley, Smith……still elite colleges.

The Ivies. Still the Ivies.

Kill off professional college sports and the elite academic schools stay elite.

“Bama could win 20 straight national football titles and it would still be ‘Bama academically.

Ditto for UK in hoops.
 
I love Carolina Sports
I love the Academic side more Because the avg Joe in NC can attend a really top quality school-and increasingly the Financial Aid is catching up with the poor counties
It is the Crown Jewel of our State-I do fear it is under attack
 
I would say athletics can definitely impact the academic side of the university, even if it’s indirect.

Didn’t Dean Smith say something along the lines of the basketball program being the front porch for the university? App State is a good local example. What would their application numbers look like without all of their football success in the last few decades?
 
I love Carolina Sports
I love the Academic side more Because the avg Joe in NC can attend a really top quality school-and increasingly the Financial Aid is catching up with the poor counties
It is the Crown Jewel of our State-I do fear it is under attack
Your fear is justified.

The University is under attack.

The UNC System is under attack.

Each institution within the UNC System is under attack.

The last thing Art Pope and Phil Berger and Thom Tillis and the MAGA Pantheon want is an educated populace.
 
Tell the University of Chicago that it should “invest” in sports to increase donations and its endowment.

Northwestern has poured 10’s, maybe 100’s of millions into sports and it continues to suck in revenue sports; but, donations to its endowment keep increasing and its prestige as a university is great.

Williams, Amherst, Bowdoin, Wellesley, Smith……still elite colleges.

The Ivies. Still the Ivies.

Kill off professional college sports and the elite academic schools stay elite.

“Bama could win 20 straight national football titles and it would still be ‘Bama academically.

Ditto for UK in hoops.
To be fair, the question I responded to was not whether a school like Chicago should invest in sports to increase its endowment, or whether colleges can become elite without sports or if winning in sports improves a school's academic quality. It was has college sports ever helped the education budget. So my response was narrowly focused towards that.
 
I would say athletics can definitely impact the academic side of the university, even if it’s indirect.

Didn’t Dean Smith say something along the lines of the basketball program being the front porch for the university? App State is a good local example. What would their application numbers look like without all of their football success in the last few decades?
No doubt Athletic success equals increased applications-and therefore often higher standards etc
The $ in Athletics today is getting to be in a"burden" category to the University?
 
I would say athletics can definitely impact the academic side of the university, even if it’s indirect.

Didn’t Dean Smith say something along the lines of the basketball program being the front porch for the university? App State is a good local example. What would their application numbers look like without all of their football success in the last few decades?
So, an isolated App State or ‘Bama with rare success in athletics can blind us to underfunding academics overall?
 
To be fair, the question I responded to was not whether a school like Chicago should invest in sports to increase its endowment, or whether colleges can become elite without sports or if winning in sports improves a school's academic quality. It was has college sports ever helped the education budget. So my response was narrowly focused towards that.
And, overall, college sports has sucked money away from college academics.

Has college sports “ever” helped a school’s academics? Likely.

Overall, pursuing the d00k or ‘Bama path is a losing path.
 
Back
Top