stankeylegjones
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 2,169
Ah, I'm coming at from the thought that schools have a "pull." Schools with more pull will be able to bring in coaches with more attraction to their current position than schools with less pull. I think when folks say Carolina basketball is the/a top destination that means it has more pull than (almost) any other program. If that is true, then we should be able to pull any coach away from any other program, all things being equal. However, of course all things aren't equal, folks have personal reasons for staying where they are currently coaching, and these reasons might couple with the pull being applied by their present school to give an effective attraction that our pull can't overcome. However, if more than a couple of coaches decide not to come here then I think it's logical to assume (basing off of odds*) that our pull was not as strong as we thought it was; that is, we're not the top destination...maybe there isn't one.I understanding the thinking, but I think that would be an unwarranted conclusion. Like I said, it carries with it an implicit assumption that there is another "top destination" that would have caused our top targets to leave their current job, and we just won't know that. Unless one of our top targets spurns us and takes the KU job, should it come open - that would be a good reason to be depressed about the whole thing.
*What are the odds that 3+ coaches are attracted more to their current coaching position than they are to coaching at the top job in the country?


