HandsonFire
Distinguished Member
- Messages
- 495
I assume Cal is a terrible team? Or is this improvement? It feels like improvement but I don’t want to set myself up for heartbreak.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They beat Minnesota by two TDs who just beat top 25 Nebraska and is 5-2. Cal’s two losses are to 5-1 SDSU and 4-2 Duke.It’s some improvement AND Cal is not a good P4 team…..wouldn’t be a good G5 team.
UCF is 58th in SP+, Cal is 78th. they're worse than UCF by a measure and that hot start looks like an anomaly caused by a freshman QB that opponents weren't prepared for. SDSU and Duke are both pretty mediocre teams.They beat Minnesota by two TDs who just beat top 25 Nebraska and is 5-2. Cal’s two losses are to 5-1 SDSU and 4-2 Duke.
So Cal is not terrible. They are about UCF level.
They are both massively better than us.UCF is 58th in SP+, Cal is 78th. they're worse than UCF by a measure and that hot start looks like an anomaly caused by a freshman QB that opponents weren't prepared for. SDSU and Duke are both pretty mediocre teams.
The offensive line looked the best it had looked all year (save Richmond). That may have something to do with Cal’s poor D-line.Is it me or did our offensive play-calling look less horrific?
Given the way the D played on that last drive, I would not have been surprised to see Cal march down the field for a winning TD. That would have been an even more deflating loss.Fumbles were a 14 point swing. First fumble set Cal up with a short field that they converted for a TD. Second fumble takes a UNC TD off the board.